IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v13y1981i7p899-910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Future Generations and Discounting Rules in Public Sector Investment Appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • E Kula

    (Centre for Development Studies, University College of Swansea, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales)

Abstract

In public sector investment appraisal the widely recommended ‘net present value’ criterion does not treat future generations in the same way as present members of society. Because of the discounting rules applied in evaluating a government investment project by means of the net present value criterion, a decisionmaker inevitably discriminates against the future members of society by giving less weight to their share of benefits (or costs) which will accrue to them at some future date. He does this simply because they are not alive at the precise time when the decision is made. The more distant they are in time from the present generations, the less weight is attached to their shares. As a consequence, in evaluating long-term investment projects, particularly those in which the benefits and costs are separated from each other with a long time interval, the net present value rules guide the decisionmaker to maximise the utility of present generations at the expense of the future ones. If the decisionmaker wishes to treat all generations, present and future equally, as he should, instead of the net present value criterion a different method of appraisal is proposed, and is called ‘the sum of discounted consumption flows’.

Suggested Citation

  • E Kula, 1981. "Future Generations and Discounting Rules in Public Sector Investment Appraisal," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 13(7), pages 899-910, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:13:y:1981:i:7:p:899-910
    DOI: 10.1068/a130899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a130899
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a130899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen A. Marglin, 1963. "The Social Rate of Discount and The Optimal Rate of Investment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 77(1), pages 95-111.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Price, Colin, 2018. "Declining discount rate and the social cost of carbon: Forestry consequences," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 39-45.
    2. Wayne Visser & Alastair Macintosh, 1998. "A short review of the historical critique of usury," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 175-189.
    3. Price, Colin, 6. "Optimal Rotation under Continually – or Continuously – Declining Discount Rate," Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, issue 42, April.
    4. Colin, Price, 2011. "Optimal rotation with declining discount rate," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 307-318, August.
    5. Brazee, Richard J., 2018. "Impacts of declining discount rates on optimal harvest age and land expectation values," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 27-38.
    6. Young, Ralph, 1992. "Evaluating Long-Lived Projects: The Issue Of Inter-Generational Equity," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 36(3), pages 1-26, December.
    7. R. A. Sharma & M. J. McGregor, 1993. "The Social Discount Rate For Land‐Use Projects In India: Reply," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 166-167, January.
    8. Dagenais, Denyse L., 1995. "L’économiste et les confitures," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 71(3), pages 277-290, septembre.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rausser, Gordon C. & de Janvry, Alain & Schmitz, Andrew & Zilberman, David D., 1980. "Principal issues in the evaluation of public research in agriculture," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt74v9m7dh, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    2. Wylie Bradford, 2014. "Quo vadis: Does economic theory need a sustainability makeover?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 25(4), pages 551-562, December.
    3. Li, Qingran & Pizer, William A., 2021. "Use of the consumption discount rate for public policy over the distant future," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Dong-Xuan, Bach & Qu, Xiangyu, 2024. "Restricted Dominant Unanimity and Social Discounting," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 697, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    5. Heinzel, Christoph & Winkler, Ralph, 2006. "Gradual versus structural technological change in the transition to a low-emission energy industry: How time-to-build and differing social and individual discount rates influence environmental and tec," Dresden Discussion Paper Series in Economics 09/06, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Economics.
    6. Katrina Forrester, 2018. "The problem of the future in postwar Anglo-American political philosophy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 55-66, November.
    7. Lawrence H. Goulder & Ian W. H. Parry, 2008. "Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 2(2), pages 152-174, Summer.
    8. Andrew Caplin & John Leahy, 2004. "The Social Discount Rate," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(6), pages 1257-1268, December.
    9. Pezzey, John C.V., 2001. "Optimality, Hartwick’s Rule, and Instruments of Sustainability Policy and Environmental Policy," 2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide, Australia 125833, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    10. Preston Greene, 2024. "Social bias, not time bias," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 23(1), pages 100-121, February.
    11. Kenneth J. Arrow, 1999. "Inter-Generational Equity and the Rate of Discount in Long-Term Social Investment," International Economic Association Series, in: Murat R. Sertel (ed.), Contemporary Economic Issues, chapter 5, pages 89-102, Palgrave Macmillan.
    12. Voinov, Alexey & Farley, Joshua, 2007. "Reconciling sustainability, systems theory and discounting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 104-113, June.
    13. Coppola, Andrea & Fernholz, Fernando & Glenday, Graham, 2014. "Estimating the economic opportunity cost of capital for public investment projects : an empirical analysis of the Mexican case," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6816, The World Bank.
    14. Jean Tirole, 1981. "Taux d'actualisation et optimum second," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 32(5), pages 829-869.
    15. Millner, Antony & Heal, Geoffrey, 2018. "Time consistency and time invariance in collective intertemporal choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 158-169.
    16. Lazaro, Angelina & Barberan, Ramon & Rubio, Encarnacion, 2002. "The discounted utility model and social preferences:: Some alternative formulations to conventional discounting," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 317-337, June.
    17. Liqun Liu & Andrew J. Rettenmaier & Thomas R. Saving, 2004. "A Generalized Approach to Multigeneration Project Evaluation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 71(2), pages 377-396, October.
    18. Gonzalez, Francisco M. & Lazkano, Itziar & Smulders, Sjak A., 2018. "Intergenerational altruism with future bias," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 436-454.
    19. Gabay, Daniel & Grasselli, Martino, 2012. "Fair demographic risk sharing in defined contribution pension systems," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 657-669.
    20. Xiangyu Qu & Bach Dong Xuan, 2024. "Unilateral Dominance and Social Discounting," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-04487520, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:13:y:1981:i:7:p:899-910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.