IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/entthe/v32y2008i2p249-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Separated by a Common Language? Entrepreneurship Research across the Atlantic

Author

Listed:
  • Candida G. Brush
  • Tatiana S. Manolova
  • Linda F. Edelman

Abstract

While recent inventories and assessments of the entrepreneurship field examine the focus, purpose, and methods, one area receiving less attention is the outcome or dependent variable. The outcome variable is of critical importance in scholarship, as it is a leading indicator of the cumulative nature of the scholarship in our field. This paper reviews 389 articles published over the past 3 years in four top entrepreneurship journals; two published in the United States and two published in Europe. It classifies the scholarship by theoretical underpinnings, independent variables, dependent variables, and then looks at the variation in these by origin of the journal. Results indicate that entrepreneurship researchers are using a wide variety of dependent variables, that the most popular unit of analysis is the firm, and that performance, broadly defined, is the most popular dependent variable. Implications for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Candida G. Brush & Tatiana S. Manolova & Linda F. Edelman, 2008. "Separated by a Common Language? Entrepreneurship Research across the Atlantic," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(2), pages 249-266, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:32:y:2008:i:2:p:249-266
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00225.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00225.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00225.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deniz Ucbasaran & Paul Westhead & Mike Wright, 2001. "The Focus of Entrepreneurial Research: Contextual and Process Issues," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 57-80, July.
    2. Richard L. Daft & Arie Y. Lewin, 1990. "Can Organization Studies Begin to Break Out of the Normal Science Straitjacket? An Editorial Essay," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9, February.
    3. Murray B. Low, 2001. "The Adolescence of Entrepreneurship Research: Specification of Purpose," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 17-26, July.
    4. Per Davidsson & Murray B. Low & Mike Wright, 2001. "Editor's Introduction: Low and MacMillan Ten Years On: Achievements and Future Directions for Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 5-15, July.
    5. Howard E. Aldrich & Martha Argelia Martinez, 2001. "Many are Called, but Few are Chosen: An Evolutionary Perspective for the Study of Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 41-56, July.
    6. Murphy, Gregory B. & Trailer, Jeff W. & Hill, Robert C., 1996. "Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 15-23, May.
    7. Gaylen N. Chandler & Douglas W. Lyon, 2001. "Issues of Research Design and Construct Measurement in Entrepreneurship Research: The past Decade," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 101-113, July.
    8. William B. Gartner, 2001. "Is There an Elephant in Entrepreneurship? Blind Assumptions in Theory Development," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 27-39, July.
    9. Per Davidsson & Johan Wiklund, 2001. "Levels of Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: Current Research Practice and Suggestions for the Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 81-100, July.
    10. Brush, Candida G. & Vanderwerf, Pieter A., 1992. "A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 157-170, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rosa Peter J., 2013. "Recent Trends in Leading Entrepreneurship Research: The Challenge for European Researchers," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 35-43, January.
    2. Leanne Johnstone & Mariana Pio Monteiro & Inês Ferreira & Johanna Westerlund & Roosa Aalto & Jenni Marttinen, 2018. "Language ability and entrepreneurship education: Necessary skills for Europe’s start-ups?," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 369-397, September.
    3. Gjalt de Jong & Phan Anh Tu & Hans van Ees, 2012. "Which Entrepreneurs Bribe and what do they Get from It? Exploratory Evidence from Vietnam," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(2), pages 323-345, March.
    4. Brendan Gray & Andrea Farminer, 2014. "And no birds sing—reviving the romance with international entrepreneurship," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 115-128, June.
    5. Xuequn Wang & Leonard M. Jessup, 2014. "A Review and Synthesis of Entrepreneurship Research: Towards an Integrative Model of Dependent Variables," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 23(2), pages 163-199, September.
    6. Friederike Welter & Frank Lasch, 2008. "Entrepreneurship Research in Europe: Taking Stock and Looking Forward," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(2), pages 241-248, March.
    7. Borsi, Balázs & Dőry, Tibor, 2015. "A vállalkozóképzés nemzetközi trendjei és a vállalkozói készségek egyetemi fejlesztése. A Széchenyi István Egyetem tudásvállalkozás-fejlesztési programjának tapasztalatai [International trends of e," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 835-852.
    8. Didier Nobile & Christophe Schmitt & Julien Husson, 2012. "L'élu-entrepreneur local, un entrepreneur comme les autres ?," Post-Print hal-03000322, HAL.
    9. William B. Gartner, 2008. "Entrepreneurship—Hop," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(2), pages 361-368, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rogoff, Edward G. & Heck, Ramona Kay Zachary, 2003. "Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: recognizing family as the oxygen that feeds the fire of entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 559-566, September.
    2. Schuster, Charlotte Leonie, 2013. "Entrepreneurship - Methodische Herausforderungen einer jungen Forschungsdisziplin [Entrepreneurship - Methodological challenges of a young research discipline]," MPRA Paper 45472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Denis A. Grégoire & Martin X. Noël & Richard Déry & Jean–Pierre Béchard, 2006. "Is There Conceptual Convergence in Entrepreneurship Research? A Co–Citation Analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981–2004," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(3), pages 333-373, May.
    4. Peter W. Moroz & Kevin Hindle, 2012. "Entrepreneurship as a Process: Toward Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(4), pages 781-818, July.
    5. Lichtenstein, Benyamin B. & Dooley, Kevin J. & Lumpkin, G.T., 2006. "Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 153-175, March.
    6. Xuequn Wang & Leonard M. Jessup, 2014. "A Review and Synthesis of Entrepreneurship Research: Towards an Integrative Model of Dependent Variables," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 23(2), pages 163-199, September.
    7. Baltzopoulos, Apostolos, 2009. "The Firm and the Region as Breeding Grounds for Entrepreneurs," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 189, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    8. Johan Wiklund & Per Davidsson & David B. Audretsch & Charlie Karlsson, 2011. "The Future of Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 1-9, January.
    9. Bojica, Ana Maria & Fuentes Fuentes, María del Mar, 2008. "Entrepreneurship, principios de un largo recorrido," Gestión Joven "Revista de la Agrupación Joven Iberoamericana de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas". Young Management "Journal of the Young Iberomerican Group of Accounting and Business Adminis, Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas (AECA). Spanish Accounting and Business Administration Association., issue 1, April.
    10. Tobias Kollmann & Andreas Kuckertz & Christoph Stöckmann & Patrick Krell, 2012. "Die Entrepreneurshipforschung in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Eine Resonanzanalyse," ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 60(1), pages 53-76.
    11. Robert A. Blackburn & David Smallbone, 2008. "Researching Small Firms and Entrepreneurship in the U.K.: Developments and Distinctiveness," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(2), pages 267-288, March.
    12. Erik Lundmark & Alf Westelius, 2014. "Entrepreneurship as Elixir and Mutagen," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(3), pages 575-600, May.
    13. Forsström-Tuominen, Heidi & Jussila, Iiro & Kolhinen, Johanna, 2015. "Business school students’ social construction of entrepreneurship: Claiming space for collective entrepreneurship discourses," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 102-120.
    14. Woolley Jennifer L., 2011. "Studying the Emergence of New Organizations: Entrepreneurship Research Design," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-28, January.
    15. Frank Lasch & Saïd Yami, 2008. "The Nature and Focus of Entrepreneurship Research in France over the Last Decade: A French Touch?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(2), pages 339-360, March.
    16. Marcus Box, 2008. "The death of firms: exploring the effects of environment and birth cohort on firm survival in Sweden," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 379-393, December.
    17. Per Davidsson & Murray B. Low & Mike Wright, 2001. "Editor's Introduction: Low and MacMillan Ten Years On: Achievements and Future Directions for Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 5-15, July.
    18. Min Liu & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2020. "Emergence of entrepreneurial populations: a feature dimensionality approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 971-989, April.
    19. Aldrich, Howard E. & Cliff, Jennifer E., 2003. "The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 573-596, September.
    20. Andreas Rauch & Robert van Doorn & Willem Hulsink, 2014. "A Qualitative Approach to Evidence–Based Entrepreneurship: Theoretical Considerations and an Example Involving Business Clusters," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(2), pages 333-368, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:entthe:v:32:y:2008:i:2:p:249-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.