IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v4y1993i3p197-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing Social Costing in the Electric Utility Industry1

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Palmer
  • Hadi Dowlatabadi

Abstract

Social costing refers to the regulatory practice of requiring electric utilities to incorporate external costs into utility decision making. This practice is being adopted by a growing number of state public utility commissions (PUCs). The effectiveness of this new regulatory approach in reducing the social costs of supplying electricity will depend on the range of utility decisions covered. We use a utility planning model and illustrative estimtes of environmental costs to analyze the implications of different social costing regimes for generation technology choice, social and private costs of electricity supply and electricity price. Due to large differences in private costs across technologies and fuel types, social costing regulation has little or no effect on the utility's investment decisions, dispatch of generators or output price for many of the external cost estimates considered. Applying social costing exclusively to new generating units could result in increased use of existing units and higher social cost electricity production.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Palmer & Hadi Dowlatabadi, 1993. "Implementing Social Costing in the Electric Utility Industry1," Energy & Environment, , vol. 4(3), pages 197-220, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:4:y:1993:i:3:p:197-220
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X9300400301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X9300400301
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X9300400301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitchell, Cynthia, 1992. "Integrated resource planning survey: Where the states stand," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 10-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Burtraw, Dallas & Krupnick, Alan J., 1996. "The second-best use of social cost estimates," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 467-489, December.
    2. Dallas Burtraw & Karen Palmer & Alan J. Krupnick, 1997. ""Second-Best" Adjustments to Externality Estimates in Electricity Planning with Competition," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 73(2), pages 224-239.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Starik & Mark Heuer, 2002. "Strategic inter‐organizational environmentalism in the US: A multi‐sectoral perspective of alternating eco‐policy roles," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), pages 221-235, July.
    2. Andrews, Clinton J & Govil, Shivani, 1995. "Becoming proactive about environmental risks : Regulatory reform and risk management in the US electricity sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(10), pages 885-892, October.
    3. Arsenault, E. & Bernard, J. -T. & Genest-Laplante, E., 1996. "Hydro-Quebec energy savings programs: 'Watt' are they worth?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 65-81, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:4:y:1993:i:3:p:197-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.