IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v35y2024i3p1479-1492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motivating people to adopt electricity management system based on push–pull–mooring model

Author

Listed:
  • Chien-Wei Ho

Abstract

With growing concerns about power and environment issues, smart grid technology, such as meter data management systems, can be viewed as a great solution to handle issues of the environment and energy efficiency. Based on the push–pull–mooring (PPM) model, this research views dissatisfaction, personal innovativeness, information quality, locatability, economic benefits, and perceived value as predictors to examine their impact on switch intention to an electricity management system. The analysis results display that dissatisfaction has no significant effect on switch intention. As a mooring variable, personal innovativeness not only influences switch intention positively, but also moderates the relationship between perceived value and switch intention. Moreover, through perceived value, locatability and economic benefits influence switch intention positively. This research fills the gap in government policies as well as energy companies and provides ponderable suggestions if a government and energy companies would like to change citizens’ behavior from paper-based bill to electricity management system. The government and energy companies should not overlook the effect of personal innovativeness and perceived value and put more effort to publicize the advantages of locatability and economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Chien-Wei Ho, 2024. "Motivating people to adopt electricity management system based on push–pull–mooring model," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(3), pages 1479-1492, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:1479-1492
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X221141394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X221141394
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X221141394?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritu Agarwal & Jayesh Prasad, 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 204-215, June.
    2. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    3. Peters, Derek & Axsen, Jonn & Mallett, Alexandra, 2018. "The role of environmental framing in socio-political acceptance of smart grid: The case of British Columbia, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P2), pages 1939-1951.
    4. Chi, Ting, 2018. "Understanding Chinese consumer adoption of apparel mobile commerce: An extended TAM approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 274-284.
    5. Patil, Pushp & Tamilmani, Kuttimani & Rana, Nripendra P. & Raghavan, Vishnupriya, 2020. "Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending Meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Alamgir Hossain & Ruhul Amin & Abdullah Al Masud & Md. Imran Hossain & Mohammad Awal Hossen & Mohammad Kamal Hossain, 2023. "What Drives People’s Behavioral Intention Toward Telemedicine? An Emerging Economy Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    2. Jackie London & Siyuan Li & Heshan Sun, 2022. "Seems Legit: An Investigation of the Assessing and Sharing of Unverifiable Messages on Online Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 978-1001, September.
    3. Khire Rushikesh Ulhas & Jung-Yu Lai & Juite Wang, 2016. "Impacts of collaborative IS on software development project success in Indian software firms: a service perspective," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 315-336, May.
    4. Marikyan, Davit & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Rana, Omer F. & Ranjan, Rajiv & Morgan, Graham, 2022. "“Alexa, let’s talk about my productivity”: The impact of digital assistants on work productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 572-584.
    5. Mohammed Abdo Albaom & Fatimah Sidi & Marzanah A. Jabar & Rusli Abdullah & Iskandar Ishak & Nur Anita Yunikawati & Magistyo Purboyo Priambodo & Mohammed Saleh Nusari & Dhakir Abbas Ali, 2022. "The Moderating Role of Personal Innovativeness in Tourists’ Intention to Use Web 3.0 Based on Updated Information Systems Success Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-35, October.
    6. Baudier, Patricia & Ammi, Chantal & Deboeuf-Rouchon, Matthieu, 2020. "Smart home: Highly-educated students' acceptance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    7. Wei Gu & Peng Bao & Wenyuan Hao & Jaewoong Kim, 2019. "Empirical Examination of Intention to Continue to Use Smart Home Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-12, September.
    8. Chin-Liang Hung, 2021. "The research of factors influencing advanced medical robot use," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 385-393, April.
    9. Cudjoe, Dan & Zhu, Bangzhu & Wang, Hong, 2024. "The role of incentive policies and personal innovativeness in consumers' carbon footprint tracking apps adoption in China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Zeng, Zhongping & Li, Siqi & Lian, Jiunn-Woei & Li, Jiang & Chen, Tao & Li, Yujia, 2021. "Switching behavior in the adoption of a land information system in China: A perspective of the push–pull–mooring framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. Hamzah, Muhammad Iskandar & Ramli, Faten Aisyah Ahmad & Shaw, Norman, 2023. "The moderating influence of brand image on consumers' adoption of QR-code e-wallets," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    12. Mohamed Bouteraa & Brahim Chekima & Nelson Lajuni & Ayesha Anwar, 2023. "Understanding Consumers’ Barriers to Using FinTech Services in the United Arab Emirates: Mixed-Methods Research Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/8263 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Susan A. Brown & Viswanath Venkatesh & Sandeep Goyal, 2012. "Expectation Confirmation in Technology Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 474-487, June.
    15. Xixi Li & J. J. Po-An Hsieh & Arun Rai, 2013. "Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 659-682, September.
    16. Zhen Wang & John Lim & Xiaojia Guo, 2010. "Negotiator Satisfaction in NSS-Facilitated Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 279-300, May.
    17. Zhunzhun Liu & Shenglin Ben & Ruidong Zhang, 2019. "Factors affecting consumers’ mobile payment behavior: a meta-analysis," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 575-601, September.
    18. Ying Yu & Tung-Jung Sung, 2023. "A value-based view of the smart PSS adoption: a study of smart kitchen appliances," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(2), pages 499-527, June.
    19. G. M. Azmal Ali Quaosar & Md. Abidur Rahman & Md. Siddikur Rahman, 2024. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of HRIS: An Empirical Study Using Extended UTAUT2 Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(3), pages 213-213, June.
    20. Haque, Md Ziaul & Qian, Aimin & Hoque, Md Rakibul & Lucky, Suraiea Akter, 2022. "A unified framework for exploring the determinants of online social networks (OSNs) on institutional investors’ capital market investment decision," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    21. Viswanath Venkatesh & Ritu Agarwal, 2006. "Turning Visitors into Customers: A Usability-Centric Perspective on Purchase Behavior in Electronic Channels," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 367-382, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:1479-1492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.