IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v27y2016i6-7p755-764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taxing sulphur dioxide emissions: A policy evaluation from public health perspective in China

Author

Listed:
  • HE Ling-Yun
  • OU Jia-Jia

Abstract

With the rapid development of the Chinese economy, air pollution has increased in severity. Especially, sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) has become of major concern because it can cause serious health problems like cardiovascular diseases and acidification of some soils and water bodies. To abate SO 2 , tax policies may be adopted. However, to make such policies feasible, it is important for policy-makers to know the contributions of SO 2 emissions by individual industries. This paper first attempts to quantify the contributions to the total amount of SO 2 emitted. Secondly, we estimate, from the public health perspective, the socio-economic costs of SO 2 emissions related to these industries, and then compare the impacts of different tax policies from the public health perspective on reducing SO 2 emissions. Finally, multiple policy implications are outlined for the Chinese government. The results show that indirect emission tax outperform direct tax for improvements in public health, and ultimately of people's welfare. Our findings are essential for relevant policy-making in China, as well as other emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • HE Ling-Yun & OU Jia-Jia, 2016. "Taxing sulphur dioxide emissions: A policy evaluation from public health perspective in China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 27(6-7), pages 755-764, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:27:y:2016:i:6-7:p:755-764
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X16667330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X16667330
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X16667330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patuelli, Roberto & Nijkamp, Peter & Pels, Eric, 2005. "Environmental tax reform and the double dividend: A meta-analytical performance assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 564-583, December.
    2. Bye, Brita, 2000. "Environmental Tax Reform and Producer Foresight: An Intertemporal Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 719-752, November.
    3. Chen, Su-Mei & He, Ling-Yun, 2014. "Welfare loss of China's air pollution: How to make personal vehicle transportation policy," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 106-118.
    4. Nam, Kyung-Min & Selin, Noelle E. & Reilly, John M. & Paltsev, Sergey, 2010. "Measuring welfare loss caused by air pollution in Europe: A CGE analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 5059-5071, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bwo-Ren Ke & Shyang-Chyuan Fang & Jun-Hong Lai, 2022. "Adjustment of bus departure time of an electric bus transportation system for reducing costs and carbon emissions: A case study in Penghu," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(4), pages 728-751, June.
    2. Ling-Yun He & Jia-Jia Ou, 2017. "Pollution Emissions, Environmental Policy, and Marginal Abatement Costs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Jia-Jia Ou & Ling-Yun He, 2023. "Opportunity or Challenge? Carbon Emissions Reduction under New Development Pattern of Dual Circulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Lu-Yi Qiu & Ling-Yun He, 2017. "Are Chinese Green Transport Policies Effective? A New Perspective from Direct Pollution Rebound Effect, and Empirical Evidence From the Road Transport Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    5. Ling-Yun He & Sheng Yang & Dongfeng Chang, 2017. "Oil Price Uncertainty, Transport Fuel Demand and Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Liu, Lei & Wang, Ke & Wang, Shanshan & Zhang, Ruiqin & Tang, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Assessing energy consumption, CO2 and pollutant emissions and health benefits from China's transport sector through 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 382-396.
    7. Zhangqi Zhong & Xu Zhang & Wei Shao, 2019. "Measuring global energy-related sulfur oxides emissions embodied in trade: a multi-regional and multi-sectoral analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 95(1), pages 401-418, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sumei Chen & Ling‐Yun He, 2019. "Taxation and the Environment–Health–Poverty Trap: A Policy Experiment Perspective," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 27(1), pages 72-92, January.
    2. Wu, Xianhua & Deng, Huai & Huang, Yuxiang & Guo, Ji, 2022. "Air pollution, migration costs, and urban residents’ welfare: A spatial general equilibrium analysis from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 396-409.
    3. Beltrán, Allan & Alatorre, José Eduardo & Ferrer, Jimy & Galindo, Luis Miguel, 2017. "Efectos potenciales de un impuesto al carbono sobre el producto interno bruto en los países de América Latina: estimaciones preliminares e hipotéticas a partir de un metaanálisis y una función de tran," Documentos de Proyectos 41867, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    4. Li, Na & Zhang, Xiaoling & Shi, Minjun & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D., 2019. "Does China's air pollution abatement policy matter? An assessment of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on a multi-regional CGE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 213-227.
    5. Jaume Freire-González & Mun S. Ho, 2018. "Environmental Fiscal Reform and the Double Dividend: Evidence from a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Freire-González, Jaume, 2018. "Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE modelling literature: A critical review," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 194-223.
    7. Richard Tol, 2011. "Regulating knowledge monopolies: the case of the IPCC," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 827-839, October.
    8. Jie Yan & Ruiliang Wang, 2024. "Green Fiscal and Tax Policies in China: An Environmental Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, April.
    9. John Reilly & Sergey Paltsev & Ken Strzepek & Noelle Selin & Yongxia Cai & Kyung-Min Nam & Erwan Monier & Stephanie Dutkiewicz & Jeffery Scott & Mort Webster & Andrei Sokolov, 2013. "Valuing climate impacts in integrated assessment models: the MIT IGSM," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 561-573, April.
    10. Gupta, Monika & Bandyopadhyay, Kaushik Ranjan & Singh, Sanjay K., 2019. "Measuring effectiveness of carbon tax on Indian road passenger transport: A system dynamics approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 341-354.
    11. Dellink, Rob & van Ierland, Ekko, 2006. "Pollution abatement in the Netherlands: A dynamic applied general equilibrium assessment," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 207-221, February.
    12. Antimiani, Alessandro & Costantini, Valeria & Kuik, Onno & Paglialunga, Elena, 2016. "Mitigation of adverse effects on competitiveness and leakage of unilateral EU climate policy: An assessment of policy instruments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 246-259.
    13. de Bruin, Kelly & Yakut, Aykut Mert, 2024. "Efficiency–equity trade-off in the Irish carbon tax: A CGE investigation of mixed revenue recycling schemes," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Jinghua Zhang & Wenzhen Zhang, 2013. "Will Carbon Tax Yield Employment Double Dividend for China?," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(4), pages 124-131, April.
    15. Pinglin He & Jing Ning & Zhongfu Yu & Hao Xiong & Huayu Shen & Hui Jin, 2019. "Can Environmental Tax Policy Really Help to Reduce Pollutant Emissions? An Empirical Study of a Panel ARDL Model Based on OECD Countries and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-32, August.
    16. Ditya Agung Nurdianto, 2016. "Economic Impacts of a Carbon Tax in an Integrated ASEAN," EEPSEA Special and Technical Paper tp201604t5, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Apr 2016.
    17. Su-Mei Chen & Jia-Jia Ou & Ling-Yun He, 2021. "The Environmental and Health Impacts of Poverty Alleviation in China: From a Consumption-Based Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    18. Rauf, Abdul & Zhang, Jin & Li, Jinkai & Amin, Waqas, 2018. "Structural changes, energy consumption and carbon emissions in China: Empirical evidence from ARDL bound testing model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 194-206.
    19. Grant Allan & Peter McGregor & Kim Swales & Karen Turner, 2007. "The UK Climate Change Levy and the Potential for Double-Dividend Effects under Different Labour Market Specifications: a Computable General Equilibrium Analysis for the United Kingdom," Energy and Environmental Modeling 2007 24000001, EcoMod.
    20. González-Eguino, Mikel, 2011. "The importance of the design of market-based instruments for CO2 mitigation: An AGE analysis for Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2292-2302.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:27:y:2016:i:6-7:p:755-764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.