IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v44y2023i2p139-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Downside Risk and Portfolio Optimization of Energy Stocks: A Study on the Extreme Value Theory and the Vine Copula Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Madhusudan Karmakar
  • Samit Paul

Abstract

ABSTRACT Energy stocks are potentially a hedge against inflation and have a number of advantages over other forms of energy investing. This motivates us to study on portfolio management of energy stocks. We compare the performance of proposed GARCH-EVT-vine copula models under three different dimensions with other competing models using energy stocks from the U.S. market. In our proposed model, we use static C- and D-vine copulas. We compare the accuracy and efficiency of different models in forecasting portfolio VaR and CVaR. We also examine whether the proposed models yield greater economic and statistical performances than the competing models in a tactical asset allocation framework. Our findings indicate that the proposed models perform best overall. In fact, the relatively better performance of the proposed model is even more prominent when the portfolio size increases. Further, the comparative analysis between GARCHEVT-static vine and GARCH-EVT-dynamic vine copula models produces mixed results.

Suggested Citation

  • Madhusudan Karmakar & Samit Paul, 2023. "Downside Risk and Portfolio Optimization of Energy Stocks: A Study on the Extreme Value Theory and the Vine Copula Approach," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(2), pages 139-180, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:44:y:2023:i:2:p:139-180
    DOI: 10.5547/01956574.44.2.mkar
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/01956574.44.2.mkar
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/01956574.44.2.mkar?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Raman Uppal, 2009. "Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1-N Portfolio Strategy?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(5), pages 1915-1953, May.
    2. E. Allevi & L. Boffino & M. E. Giuli & G. Oggioni, 2019. "Analysis of long-term natural gas contracts with vine copulas in optimization portfolio problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 1-37, March.
    3. Arreola Hernandez, Jose, 2014. "Are oil and gas stocks from the Australian market riskier than coal and uranium stocks? Dependence risk analysis and portfolio optimization," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 528-536.
    4. Bouri, Elie & Lau, Chi Keung Marco & Lucey, Brian & Roubaud, David, 2019. "Trading volume and the predictability of return and volatility in the cryptocurrency market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 340-346.
    5. Dißmann, J. & Brechmann, E.C. & Czado, C. & Kurowicka, D., 2013. "Selecting and estimating regular vine copulae and application to financial returns," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 52-69.
    6. Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Li, Huimin & Jeon, Bang, 2003. "Causality and volatility spillovers among petroleum prices of WTI, gasoline and heating oil in different locations," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 89-114, March.
    7. R. Cont, 2001. "Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 223-236.
    8. Reboredo, Juan C. & Ugolini, Andrea, 2016. "Quantile dependence of oil price movements and stock returns," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 33-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng Juan Zhan & William Rea & Alethea Rea, 2016. "Stock Selection as a Problem in Phylogenetics—Evidence from the ASX," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Guillaume Coqueret, 2016. "Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions," Post-Print hal-02088097, HAL.
    3. Reboredo, Juan C. & Ugolini, Andrea, 2018. "The impact of energy prices on clean energy stock prices. A multivariate quantile dependence approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 136-152.
    4. Vincent Tan & Stefan Zohren, 2020. "Estimation of Large Financial Covariances: A Cross-Validation Approach," Papers 2012.05757, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    5. DiTraglia, Francis J. & Gerlach, Jeffrey R., 2013. "Portfolio selection: An extreme value approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 305-323.
    6. Wang, Chou-Wen & Liu, Kai & Li, Bin & Tan, Ken Seng, 2022. "Portfolio optimization under multivariate affine generalized hyperbolic distributions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 49-66.
    7. Jose Arreola Hernandez & Shawkat Hammoudeh & Duc Khuong Nguyen & Mazin A. M. Al Janabi & Juan Carlos Reboredo, 2017. "Global financial crisis and dependence risk analysis of sector portfolios: a vine copula approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(25), pages 2409-2427, May.
    8. Wang, Yudong & Liu, Li & Ma, Feng & Wu, Chongfeng, 2016. "What the investors need to know about forecasting oil futures return volatility," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 128-139.
    9. Wanling Huang & André Varella Mollick & Khoa Huu Nguyen, 2017. "Dynamic responses and tail-dependence among commodities, the US real interest rate and the dollar," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 959-997, November.
    10. Hannah Cheng Juan Zhan & William Rea & Alethea Rea, 2015. "A Comparison of Three Network Portfolio Selection Methods -- Evidence from the Dow Jones," Working Papers in Economics 15/02, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    11. Ponta, Linda & Murialdo, Pietro & Carbone, Anna, 2021. "Information measure for long-range correlated time series: Quantifying horizon dependence in financial markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 570(C).
    12. Coqueret, Guillaume, 2017. "Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 180-201.
    13. Nathan Lassance & Frédéric Vrins, 2021. "Minimum Rényi entropy portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 23-46, April.
    14. Tamara Teplova & Mikova Evgeniia & Qaiser Munir & Nataliya Pivnitskaya, 2023. "Black-Litterman model with copula-based views in mean-CVaR portfolio optimization framework with weight constraints," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 515-535, February.
    15. Huang, Jionghao & Li, Ziruo & Xia, Xiaohua, 2021. "Network diffusion of international oil volatility risk in China's stock market: Quantile interconnectedness modelling and shock decomposition analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-39.
    16. František Čech & Jozef Baruník, 2019. "Panel quantile regressions for estimating and predicting the value‐at‐risk of commodities," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(9), pages 1167-1189, September.
    17. Giovanni Bonaccolto & Sandra Paterlini, 2020. "Developing new portfolio strategies by aggregation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 933-971, September.
    18. Karoline Bax & Ozge Sahin & Claudia Czado & Sandra Paterlini, 2021. "ESG, Risk, and (Tail) Dependence," Papers 2105.07248, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    19. Yugo Fujimoto & Kei Nakagawa & Kentaro Imajo & Kentaro Minami, 2022. "Uncertainty Aware Trader-Company Method: Interpretable Stock Price Prediction Capturing Uncertainty," Papers 2210.17030, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    20. Su, Xiaoshan & Li, Yuhan, 2024. "Robust portfolio selection with subjective risk aversion under dependence uncertainty," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    VaR; CVaR; EVT; Copula; C-Vine; D-Vine; Dynamic;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:44:y:2023:i:2:p:139-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.