IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v1y2000i3p267-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Gender Gap

Author

Listed:
  • Brent F. Nelsen

    (Department of Political Science, Furman University, USA)

  • James L. Guth

    (Department of Political Science, Furman University, USA)

Abstract

We attempt to further the `normal' study of public opinion in the European Union (EU) by examining the relationship of gender to attitudes toward integration. Using Eurobarometer 42 we demonstrate that a modest gender gap exists, with women being less enthusiastic about the EU than men. We then construct a model to explain male and female attitudes using measures of political distance, women's values, ideology, economic vulnerability and national tradition. Women's attitudes are more sensitive to knowledge about the EU and to economic pessimism than men's, while men's attitudes are determined more by interest in politics, traditionalist values, ideology, and working-class status. We conclude by analyzing interesting differences that emerge when respondents are grouped by `type of welfare state'.

Suggested Citation

  • Brent F. Nelsen & James L. Guth, 2000. "Exploring the Gender Gap," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(3), pages 267-291, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:1:y:2000:i:3:p:267-291
    DOI: 10.1177/1465116500001003001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116500001003001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1465116500001003001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Lawler, 1997. "Scandinavian Exceptionalism and European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 565-594, December.
    2. Caldeira, Gregory A. & Gibson, James L., 1995. "The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(2), pages 356-376, June.
    3. Martin Slater, 1982. "Political Elites, Popular Indifference and Community Building," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 69-93, September.
    4. David Arter, 1995. "The EU Referendum in Finland on 16 October 1994: A Vote for the West, not for Maastricht," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 361-387, September.
    5. Janssen, Joseph I. H., 1991. "Postmaterialism, Cognitive Mobilization and Public Support for European Integration," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 443-468, October.
    6. Eichenberg, Richard C. & Dalton, Russell J., 1993. "Europeans and the European Community: the dynamics of public support for European integration," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(4), pages 507-534, October.
    7. Inglehart, Ronald, 1970. "Public Opinion and Regional Integration," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 764-795, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias, 2013. "Why do they want the UN to decide? A two-step model of public support for UN authority," TranState Working Papers 171, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    2. Ronald D. Gelleny & Christopher J. Anderson, 2000. "The Economy, Accountability, and Public Support for the President of the European Commission," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(2), pages 173-200, June.
    3. Jo Saglie, 2000. "Values, Perceptions and European Integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(2), pages 227-249, June.
    4. Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias, 2010. "Problem perception and public expectations in international institutions: Evidence from a German representative survey," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2010-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    5. Roxana-Otilia-Sonia HRITCU, 2015. "European Integration: A Multilevel Process That Requires A Multilevel Statistical Analysis," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7(3), pages 728-739, September.
    6. Sean Carey, 2002. "Undivided Loyalties," European Union Politics, , vol. 3(4), pages 387-413, December.
    7. Sylvia Kritzinger, 2003. "The Influence of the Nation-State on Individual Support for the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 4(2), pages 219-241, June.
    8. Hans Rattinger, 1994. "Public Attitudes to European Integration in Germany after Maastricht: Inventory and Typology," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 525-540, December.
    9. Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca, 2000. "The Political Basis of Support for European Integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(2), pages 147-171, June.
    10. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:1261-1281 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Christopher J Anderson & Jason D Hecht, 2018. "The preference for Europe: Public opinion about European integration since 1952," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 617-638, December.
    12. Adam William Chalmers & Lisa Maria Dellmuth, 2015. "Fiscal redistribution and public support for European integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(3), pages 386-407, September.
    13. Adam P. Brinegar & Seth K. Jolly, 2005. "Location, Location, Location," European Union Politics, , vol. 6(2), pages 155-180, June.
    14. Roxana-Otilia-Sonia Hritcu, 2015. "Multilevel Models: Conceptual Framework and Applicability," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 11(5), pages 72-83, October.
    15. Brent F. Nelsen & James L. Guth & Cleveland R. Fraser, 2001. "Does Religion Matter?," European Union Politics, , vol. 2(2), pages 191-217, June.
    16. Fuchs, Dieter, 2002. "Das Demokratiedefizit der Europäischen Union und die politische Integration Europas: Eine Analyse der Einstellungen der Bürger in Westeuropa," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 02-204, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    17. Lisbet Hooghe & Gary Marks, 2005. "The Neofunctionalists Were (almost) Right: Politicization and European Integration," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0024, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
    18. Karl Kaltenthaler & Christopher J. Anderson & William J. Miller, 2010. "Accountability and Independent Central Banks: Europeans and Distrust of the European Central Bank," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5), pages 1261-1281, November.
    19. Julian Aichholzer & Sylvia Kritzinger & Carolina Plescia, 2021. "National identity profiles and support for the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(2), pages 293-315, June.
    20. Marcel Lubbers & Eva Jaspers, 2011. "A longitudinal study of euroscepticism in the Netherlands: 2008 versus 1990," European Union Politics, , vol. 12(1), pages 21-40, March.
    21. Daniele, Gianmarco & Geys, Benny, 2012. "Public support for institutionalised solidarity: Europeans' reaction to the establishment of eurobonds," Discussion Papers, Research Professorship & Project "The Future of Fiscal Federalism" SP II 2012-112, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:1:y:2000:i:3:p:267-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.