IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v33y2022i2p238-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Austerity in the United Kingdom and its legacy: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Tania Arrieta

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed that public institutions and some households in the United Kingdom (UK) were in a vulnerable and weak financial position to mitigate its immediate outcomes. Public institutions did not have the necessary resources to support their communities and low-income groups were disproportionally affected by the economic contraction of 2020–2021. This paper explores how the disastrous consequences of the pandemic were exacerbated by the implementation of an austerity programme, that as an extension of a neoliberal ideology, supported the development of the market at the expense of reducing the welfare state. Through an assessment of four trends that were reinforced during austerity—the four ‘Ds’—this article shows that austerity influenced many of the struggles observed during the pandemic. These trends are disinvestment, decentralisation, decollectivisation and disintegration. Despite the lessons learnt in 2020–2021 and the evident need to move away from a neoliberal agenda that dismantled the capacities of the state, this article concludes that neoliberalism continues to threaten the welfare state and the formation of social collectivities. Some expenditure decisions taken by the British government in 2020–2021 could further deepen social class divisions and regional inequalities. More is needed from the government to tackle these social problems and to build a fairer and more equal society. JEL Codes: H0, I3, O1

Suggested Citation

  • Tania Arrieta, 2022. "Austerity in the United Kingdom and its legacy: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(2), pages 238-255, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:33:y:2022:i:2:p:238-255
    DOI: 10.1177/10353046221083051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10353046221083051
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10353046221083051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sutherland, Holly & Piachaud, David, 2001. "Reducing Child Poverty in Britain: An Assessment of Government Policy 1997-2001," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(469), pages 85-101, February.
    2. Mia Gray & Anna Barford, 2018. "The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 541-563.
    3. Stephen Bach, 2016. "Deprivileging the public sector workforce: Austerity, fragmentation and service withdrawal in Britain," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 27(1), pages 11-28, March.
    4. Blyth, Mark, 2013. "Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199828302.
    5. Neil Brenner, 2009. "Open questions on state rescaling," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 2(1), pages 123-139.
    6. Tarling, Roger & Wilkinson, S Frank, 1977. "The Social Contract: Post-War Incomes Policies and Their Inflationary Impact," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(4), pages 395-414, December.
    7. Annette Hastings & Nick Bailey & Maria Gannon & Kirsten Besemer & Glen Bramley, 2015. "Coping with the Cuts? The Management of the Worst Financial Settlement in Living Memory," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 601-621, July.
    8. Jeffrey Sommers & Charles Woolfson & Arunas Juska, 2014. "Austerity as a global prescription and lessons from the neoliberal Baltic experiment," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 25(3), pages 397-416, September.
    9. Jan Myers, 2017. "To austerity and beyond! Third sector innovation or creeping privatization of public sector services?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 97-104, February.
    10. Suzanne J. Konzelmann, 2014. "The political economics of austerity," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(4), pages 701-741.
    11. Betsy Donald & Amy Glasmeier & Mia Gray & Linda Lobao, 2014. "Austerity in the city: economic crisis and urban service decline?," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(1), pages 3-15.
    12. Sarah K Bruch & KaLeigh K White, 2018. "Politics, State discretion and retrenchment in safety net provision: evidence from the USA in the post-Welfare Reform era," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 459-483.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christopher L. Atkinson, 2022. "Theme-based Book Review: Business, Government, and Neoliberalism," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1313-1323, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dennis Pepple & Kehinde Olowookere, 2021. "Towards an Understanding of the Dynamics of Work and Employment Relations during Austerity," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 281-297, June.
    2. Yunji Kim & Austin M Aldag & Mildred E Warner, 2021. "Blocking the progressive city: How state pre-emptions undermine labour rights in the USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1158-1175, May.
    3. Crispian Fuller, 2017. "City government in an age of austerity: Discursive institutions and critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 745-766, April.
    4. David A Spencer & Mark Stuart & Chris Forde & Christopher J McLachlan, 2023. "Furloughing and COVID-19: assessing regulatory reform of the state," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 81-91.
    5. K. B. Usha, 2014. "Social Consequences of Neoliberal Economic Crisis and Austerity Policy in the Baltic States," International Studies, , vol. 51(1-4), pages 72-100, January.
    6. Antoine Grandclement & Guilhem Boulay, 2021. "From The Uneven De-Diversification Of Local Financial Resources To Planning Policies: The Residentialization Hypothesis," Post-Print halshs-03322259, HAL.
    7. David Clelland, 2020. "Beyond the city region? Uneven governance and the evolution of regional economic development in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(1), pages 7-26, February.
    8. Julia Heslop & Josh Chambers & James Maloney & George Spurgeon & Hannah Swainston & Hannah Woodall, 2023. "Re-contextualising purpose-built student accommodation in secondary cities: The role of planning policy, consultation and economic need during austerity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 923-940, April.
    9. Antoine Grandclement & Guilhem Boulay, 2021. "From the uneven de-diversification of local financial resources to planning policies: The residentialization hypothesis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1454-1472, September.
    10. Susan Baker & Matthew J. Quinn, 2022. "Populism, Austerity and Governance for Sustainable Development in Troubled Times: Introduction to Special Issue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Yuanshuo Xu & Mildred E. Warner, 2022. "Crowding Out Development: Fiscal Federalism after the Great Recession," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 311-329, March.
    12. Haikola, Simon & Anshelm, Jonas, 2020. "Evolutionary governance in mining: Boom and bust in peripheral communities in Sweden," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    13. Andrew Robson & David Hart, 2019. "The post-Brexit donor: segmenting the UK charitable marketplace using political attitudes and national identity," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 16(2), pages 313-334, December.
    14. Annette Hastings & Nick Bailey & Glen Bramley & Maria Gannon, 2017. "Austerity urbanism in England: The ‘regressive redistribution’ of local government services and the impact on the poor and marginalised," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(9), pages 2007-2024, September.
    15. Crispian Fuller & Karen West, 2017. "The possibilities and limits of political contestation in times of ‘urban austerity’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(9), pages 2087-2106, July.
    16. Friebel, Rocco & Yoo, Katelyn Jison & Maynou, Laia, 2022. "Opioid abuse and austerity: Evidence on health service use and mortality in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    17. Mildred E Warner & Paige M Kelly & Xue Zhang, 2023. "Challenging austerity under the COVID-19 state," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 197-209.
    18. Yunji Kim, 2019. "Limits of fiscal federalism: How narratives of local government inefficiency facilitate scalar dumping in New York State," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 636-653, May.
    19. Mia Gray & Anna Barford, 2018. "The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 541-563.
    20. Sheila C Dow, 2015. "The role of belief in the case for austerity policies," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 26(1), pages 29-42, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    austerity; COVID-19; decentralisation; decollectivisation; disintegration; disinvestment; neoliberalism; pandemic;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H0 - Public Economics - - General
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:33:y:2022:i:2:p:238-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.