IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v32y2021i1p115-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

i4.0, 3D printing, deglobalisation and new manufacturing clusters: The view from Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Al Rainnie

Abstract

Before the COVID-19 pandemic erupted onto the world stage, a new narrative was apparently beginning to emerge about the impact of i4.0 and new technologies in general, and three-dimensional printing in particular, on the future of work and employment. This was to have particular geographical implications for the manufacturing sector in particular. Proponents of i4.0 also suggested that this process, particularly in manufacturing, would promote the re-emergence of patterns of clustering. Developments in advanced manufacturing, particularly three-dimensional printing, would accelerate and reinforce these tendencies. This article looks at the role that three-dimensional printing is supposed to play in the new world, and in particular, critically evaluates its role in reinforcing the trend towards deglobalisation on the one hand, and, on the other, new clusters of manufacturing industry. JEL code: O33

Suggested Citation

  • Al Rainnie, 2021. "i4.0, 3D printing, deglobalisation and new manufacturing clusters: The view from Australia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(1), pages 115-133, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:32:y:2021:i:1:p:115-133
    DOI: 10.1177/1035304620981429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1035304620981429
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1035304620981429?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jamie Morgan, 2020. "Electric vehicles: the future we made and the problem of unmaking it," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 44(4), pages 953-977.
    2. Crescenzi, Riccardo & Iammarino, Simona & Ioramashvili, Carolin & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Storper, Michael, 2020. "The geography of innovation and development: global spread and local hotspots," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105116, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Mary Hallward-Driemeier & Gaurav Nayyar, 2017. "Trouble in the Making?," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 27946.
    4. Judith Clifton & Amy Glasmeier & Mia Gray, 2020. "When machines think for us: the consequences for work and place," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 3-23.
    5. Finbarr Livesey, 2018. "Commentary Unpacking the possibilities of deglobalisation," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(1), pages 177-187.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alistair Rainnie, 2021. "Regional development and agency: Unfinished business," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(1), pages 42-55, February.
    2. Mark Dean & Al Rainnie & Jim Stanford & Dan Nahum, 2021. "Industrial policy-making after COVID-19: Manufacturing, innovation and sustainability," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(2), pages 283-303, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Meeteren, Michiel & Kleibert, Jana, 2022. "The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(2), pages 389-406.
    2. Michiel van Meeteren & Jana Kleibert, 2022. "The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’ [Uneven and combined state capitalism]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(2), pages 389-406.
    3. Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Ajit K. Ghose, 2021. "Structural Change and Development in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 15(1), pages 7-29, April.
    5. Baldwin, Richard & Forslid, Rikard, 2023. "Globotics and Development: When Manufacturing Is Jobless and Services Are Tradeable," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3-4), pages 302-311, October.
    6. Andrea Szalavetz, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence-Based Development Strategy in Dependent Market Economies - Any Room amidst Big Power Rivalry?," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(4), pages 40-54.
    7. Cherif Reda & Hasanov Fuad, 2019. "Principles of True Industrial Policy," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Seth Schindler & Jonathan Silver, 2019. "Florida in the Global South: How Eurocentrism Obscures Global Urban Challenges—and What We Can Do about It," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 794-805, July.
    9. Anna Davies & Betsy Donald & Mia Gray, 2023. "The power of platforms—precarity and place," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(2), pages 245-256.
    10. Alistair Dieppe, 2021. "Global Productivity," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 34015.
    11. Valerie Mercer-Blackman & Christine Ablaza, 2018. "The Servicification of Manufacturing in Asia: Redefining the Sources of Labor Productivity," Working Papers id:12954, eSocialSciences.
    12. Seda Ekmen Ozcelik, 2018. "The Potential Effects of TPP, TTIP and Trump's Tariffs on China's Competitiveness in the US Market," World Journal of Applied Economics, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, vol. 4(2), pages 95-115, December.
    13. Marta Gancarczyk & Óscar Rodil-Marzábal, 2022. "Fintech framing financial ecologies: Conceptual and policy-related implications," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 18(4), pages 7-44.
    14. Kemeny, Tom & Petralia, Sergio & Storper, Michael, 2022. "Disruptive innovation and spatial inequality," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115953, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Xavier Cirera & William F. Maloney, 2017. "The Innovation Paradox," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 28341.
    16. Nenci, Silvia & Fusacchia, Ilaria & Giunta, Anna & Montalbano, Pierluigi & Pietrobelli, Carlo, 2022. "Mapping global value chain participation and positioning in agriculture and food: stylised facts, empirical evidence and critical issues," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 11(2), July.
    17. Diego Cagigas & Judith Clifton & Daniel Díaz-Fuentes & Marcos Fernández-Gutiérrez & Juan Echevarría-Cuenca & Celia Gilsanz-Gómez, 2022. "Explaining public officials’ opinions on blockchain adoption: a vignette experiment [Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(3), pages 343-357.
    18. Rolph van der Hoeven, 2018. "Employment and development in Asia," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-107, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. World Bank, 2018. "Indonesia Economic Quarterly, December 2018," World Bank Publications - Reports 30969, The World Bank Group.
    20. Nano, Enrico & Nayyar, Gaurav & Rubínová, Stela & Stolzenburg, Victor, 2021. "The impact of services liberalization on education: Evidence from India," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2021-10, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Advanced manufacturing; fourth industrial revolution; i4.0; manufacturing clusters; nearshoring; new technologies; platform capitalism; three-dimensional printing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:32:y:2021:i:1:p:115-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.