IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v11y2018i1p177-187..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commentary Unpacking the possibilities of deglobalisation

Author

Listed:
  • Finbarr Livesey

Abstract

The interpretation of the global economy has been framed as an inevitable journey towards ever greater integration—a story of hyper-globalisation. This article discusses the nature of manufacturing to understand whether this interpretation holds and to investigate the possibility of deglobalisation at the level of physical goods trade in the coming decades, and what that may imply for other non-physical elements of globalisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Finbarr Livesey, 2018. "Commentary Unpacking the possibilities of deglobalisation," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(1), pages 177-187.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:177-187.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsx030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Gancarczyk & Óscar Rodil-Marzábal, 2022. "Fintech framing financial ecologies: Conceptual and policy-related implications," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 18(4), pages 7-44.
    2. ZHANG, Huan & MI, Lili & SHAO, Xuefeng & BU, Juan, 2024. "Demystifying pathways of composition-based international strategies under the de-globalization world: A configurational approach," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2).
    3. Al Rainnie, 2021. "i4.0, 3D printing, deglobalisation and new manufacturing clusters: The view from Australia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(1), pages 115-133, March.
    4. van Meeteren, Michiel & Kleibert, Jana, 2022. "The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(2), pages 389-406.
    5. Huiwen Gong & Robert Hassink & Christopher Foster & Martin Hess & Harry Garretsen, 2022. "Globalisation in reverse? Reconfiguring the geographies of value chains and production networks [Does Covid-19 Spark the End of Globalisation?]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(2), pages 165-181.
    6. Michiel van Meeteren & Jana Kleibert, 2022. "The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’ [Uneven and combined state capitalism]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(2), pages 389-406.
    7. Peter Enderwick & Peter Buckley, . "Introduction to the focused section: COVID-19 and international production," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    8. Olga Petricevic & David J Teece, 2019. "The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1487-1512, December.
    9. Viacheslav M. Shavshukov & Natalia A. Zhuravleva, 2020. "Global Economy: New Risks and Leadership Problems," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Liu, Ting & Li, Xizhuo, 2022. "How Do MNCs Conduct Local Technological Innovation in a Host Country? An Examination From Subsidiaries' Perspective," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(3).
    11. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2019. "Deglobalization 2.0," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18560.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:177-187.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.