IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v60y2024i3p250-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating the Technological Tug-of-war: European Think Tanks’ Perspectives on the China–US Tech Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Qin Lin

    (School of International Relations and Public Affairs, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China;
    Liu Institute for Asia and Asian Studies, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA. isqinlin@gmail.com)

Abstract

The China–US Tech Competition has become a focal point of current international research. In the context of this technological competition, Europe faces the challenge of determining its positioning. As a significant force influencing European policy direction, the perspectives of European think tanks on the China–US technology competition deserve considerable attention from the academic and policy communities. This study examines research findings from eight prominent European think tanks as the sample and employs literature analysis approach to interpret the origins, impacts and prospects of the China–US technology competition from the viewpoint of European think tanks. Additionally, the study assesses Europe’s policy orientation within this technological rivalry. The research indicates that European think tanks are dedicated to providing comprehensive and objective information and recommendations to European decision-makers. Overall, European think tanks adopt a relatively neutral stance on the China–US technology competition, which may reflect certain resistance to the United States’ efforts to create a technological coalition against China by courting Europe. Looking ahead, it is crucial to further investigate the perspectives of European think tanks on the China–US technology competition in order to promote a clearer positioning of Europe’s role and responsibilities within this intense competition. Additionally, conducting research from a third-party perspective will help us gain a comprehensive understanding of the global impact of the China–US technology competition and Europe’s position and role in this context.

Suggested Citation

  • Qin Lin, 2024. "Navigating the Technological Tug-of-war: European Think Tanks’ Perspectives on the China–US Tech Competition," China Report, , vol. 60(3), pages 250-265, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:60:y:2024:i:3:p:250-265
    DOI: 10.1177/00094455241288065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00094455241288065
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00094455241288065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reinhilde Veugelers, 2017. "The challenge of China’s rise as a science and technology powerhouse," Policy Contributions 21154, Bruegel.
    2. Daniel Gros, 2019. "This is not a trade war, it is a struggle for technological and geo-strategic dominance," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 20(01), pages 21-26, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanouil Karakostas, 2022. "The Effects of Protectionism on the Exports of the Trade Partners: A Composite Index," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 15(1), pages 58-70, July.
    2. Jürgen Janger & Agnes Kügler & Anna Strauss-Kollin, 2018. "Strukturen und Bedingungen für die akademische Forschung in der EU und in Österreich. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 91(8), pages 585-597, August.
    3. Lenz, Fulko, 2020. "Europa im Systemwettbewerb mit China: Trugschlüsse, Schutzinstrumente und offensive Antworten," Argumente zur Marktwirtschaft und Politik 150, Stiftung Marktwirtschaft / The Market Economy Foundation, Berlin.
    4. Imad A. Moosa, 2020. "The Thucydides Trap as an Alternative Explanation for the US–China Trade War," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 12(1), pages 42-55, January.
    5. Maria Alejandra C. Madi, 2020. "Private Equity and Venture Capital in China in the Aftermath of the Sino-American Trade Disputes," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 12(1), pages 69-79, January.
    6. Aiyar, Shekhar & Malacrino, Davide & Presbitero, Andrea F., 2024. "Investing in friends: The role of geopolitical alignment in FDI flows," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Michael Leigh & Beth Thompson & Reinhilde Veugelers, . "A post-Brexit agreement for research and innovation," Books, Bruegel, number 34306.
    8. Doris Fischer, Nils Ole Oermann, Hans-Jürgen Wolff, Xuewu Gu, Margot Schüller Antonia Reinecke, 2019. "Die Konkurrenz um wirtschaftliche Dominanz: Wie kann sich Europa zwischen den USA und China positionieren?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(22), pages 03-21, November.
    9. Rubini, Lauretta & Pollio, Chiara & Barbieri, Elisa & Cattaruzzo, Sebastiano, 2024. "Changing structures in transnational research networks: An analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on China's scientific collaborations," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 281-297.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:60:y:2024:i:3:p:250-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.