IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v57y2021i3p289-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sino-Japan Aid War and India’s Role: Possibilities for ‘Win-Win-Win’

Author

Listed:
  • Takeshi Daimon-Sato

Abstract

For the past decade, China and Japan have been competing against each other over aid market with its implicit intention to pursue their economic interests, which turned into a rivalry between two diplomatic concepts: Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) versus Japanese Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) Strategy. The severe competition over high-speed rail (HSR) by two countries, joined by French and German competitors, has been intensified for the benefit of China, taking all of its catchup benefits with its dubious sense of rule of law. This article asks if the two initiatives can coexist with the entry of India into the game and form an equilibrium of ‘grand coalition’, benefiting all its players as ‘win-win-win’ game, which turns out to be feasible and unstable. Nevertheless, Japan still seems to have a good reason to keep India as a strategic partner of FOIP as well as a ‘gateway’ for Central and Western Asia with fragile states such as Afghanistan and Pakistan, and official development assistance (ODA) could play a significant catalyst role as ‘human security’ promoted by Professor Amartya Sen and ex-UNHCR Ms. Sadako Ogata. The COVID-19 pandemic together with the exit of the isolationist US administration may provide the world with glimmering sense of hope for the year 2021 and beyond, if and only if one becomes more aware of the complementarities of comparative advantage of China, India and Japan to pursue common interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Takeshi Daimon-Sato, 2021. "Sino-Japan Aid War and India’s Role: Possibilities for ‘Win-Win-Win’," China Report, , vol. 57(3), pages 289-308, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:57:y:2021:i:3:p:289-308
    DOI: 10.1177/00094455211023907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00094455211023907
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00094455211023907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger A McCain, 2014. "Game Theory:A Nontechnical Introduction to the Analysis of Strategy," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 9044, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kiriazidis, Theo, 2017. "The European deposit insurance in perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84107, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Noor, Sana & Yang, Wentao & Guo, Miao & van Dam, Koen H. & Wang, Xiaonan, 2018. "Energy Demand Side Management within micro-grid networks enhanced by blockchain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1385-1398.
    3. Domenico Raguseo & Jiří Špalek & Martin Klus, 2012. "A simple in-class experiment on the efficient production of the pure public good touching the median voter theorem," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(4), pages 319-326.
    4. Tugba Karabiyik & Aparajita Jaiswal & Paul Thomas & Alejandra J. Magana, 2020. "Understanding the Interactions between the Scrum Master and the Development Team: A Game-Theoretic Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Arshad Ali Javed & Patrick T.I. Lam & Albert P.C. Chan, 2014. "Change negotiation in public-private partnership projects through output specifications: an experimental approach based on game theory," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 323-348, April.
    6. Kenneth Garrett & Evan Moore, 2008. "Teaching Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibrium to Undergraduates," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 7(2), pages 79-87.
    7. T. Ermolieva & Y. Ermoliev & M. Jonas & M. Obersteiner & F. Wagner & W. Winiwarter, 2014. "Uncertainty, cost-effectiveness and environmental safety of robust carbon trading: integrated approach," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 633-646, June.
    8. Imad Antoine Ibrahim, 2020. "Legal Implications of the Use of Big Data in the Transboundary Water Context," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(3), pages 1139-1153, February.
    9. Theo Kiriazidis, 2017. "The European Deposit Insurance in Perspective," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 112, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    10. Jung S You, 2021. "Random Actions in Experimental Zero-Sum Games," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 13(1), pages 69-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:57:y:2021:i:3:p:289-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.