IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v605y2006i1p129-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

War Crimes, Democracy, and the Rule of Law in Belgrade, the Former Yugoslavia, and Beyond

Author

Listed:
  • John Hagan

    (American Bar Research Foundation)

  • Sanja Kutnjak Ivković

    (College of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the Florida State University)

Abstract

The creation and operation of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) is an advance in the rule of law and arguably part of a larger process of the globalization of democratic norms. Yet support for the ICTY is increasingly influenced by local processes in which these norms are contested by indigenous parties and forces. We explore this issue with regard to support of Serbs living in and outside of Serbia for the ICTY in comparison to local courts. Serbs in Belgrade are distinctive in insisting that war criminals be tried in their places of origin, while Serbs in Sarajevo and Vukovar agree with other groups in these settings that war criminals should be tried in the locations where their crimes occurred. This is compelling evidence of the localized influence of cultural norms on ethnic and national group members in post-war crime settings.

Suggested Citation

  • John Hagan & Sanja Kutnjak Ivković, 2006. "War Crimes, Democracy, and the Rule of Law in Belgrade, the Former Yugoslavia, and Beyond," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 605(1), pages 129-151, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:605:y:2006:i:1:p:129-151
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716206287088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716206287088
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716206287088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeremy M. Wilson, 2006. "Law and Order in an Emerging Democracy: Lessons from the Reconstruction of Kosovo’s Police and Justice Systems," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 605(1), pages 152-177, May.
    2. Gibson, James L. & Caldeira, Gregory A., 1998. "Changes in the Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice: A Post-Maastricht Analysis," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 63-91, January.
    3. Caldeira, Gregory A., 1986. "Neither the Purse Nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 80(4), pages 1209-1226, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom S. Clark, 2009. "The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(4), pages 971-989, October.
    2. Jonas Tallberg & Soetkin Verhaegen, 2020. "The Legitimacy of International Institutions among Rising and Established Powers," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 115-126, October.
    3. repec:spa:wpaper:2014wpecon7 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Llanos, Mariana & Tibi Weber, Cordula, 2021. "High courts and social media in Latin America," GIGA Working Papers 326, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    5. Staton, Jeffrey K., 2004. "When Judges Go Public: The Selective Promotion of Case Results on the Mexican Supreme Court," University of California at San Diego, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies qt4jq0f4d4, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, UC San Diego.
    6. Bonica, Adam & Sen, Maya, 2015. "The Politics of Selecting the Bench from the Bar: The Legal Profession and Partisan Incentives to Politicize the Judiciary," Working Paper Series rwp15-001, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    7. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:175-197 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Clifford J. Carrubba, 2003. "The European Court of Justice, Democracy, and Enlargement," European Union Politics, , vol. 4(1), pages 75-100, March.
    9. Juan A. Mayoral, 2017. "In the CJEU Judges Trust: A New Approach in the Judicial Construction of Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 551-568, May.
    10. Tracy H. Slagter, 2009. "National Parliaments and the ECJ: A View from the Bundestag," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 175-197, January.
    11. repec:gig:joupla:v:2:y:2010:i:3:p:99-128 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Gutmann, Jerg & Sarel, Roee & Voigt, Stefan, 2022. "Measuring Constitutional Loyalty: Evidence from the Covid-19 Pandemic," ILE Working Paper Series 55, University of Hamburg, Institute of Law and Economics.
    13. Katerina Linos & Kimberly Twist, 2016. "The Supreme Court, the Media, and Public Opinion: Comparing Experimental and Observational Methods," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(2), pages 223-254.
    14. James L. Gibson, 2007. "The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(3), pages 507-538, November.
    15. Ganghof, Steffen & Manow, Philip, 2005. "Mechanismen der Politik: Strategische Interaktion im deutschen Regierungssystem," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 54, number 54.
    16. James L. Gibson & Gregory A. Caldeira, 2009. "Confirmation Politics and The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Institutional Loyalty, Positivity Bias, and the Alito Nomination," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 139-155, January.
    17. Ian Loader, 2006. "Policing, Recognition, and Belonging," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 605(1), pages 201-221, May.
    18. Benjamin Werner, 2016. "Why is the Court of Justice of the European Union not more Contested? Three Mechanisms of Opposition Abatement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 1449-1464, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:605:y:2006:i:1:p:129-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.