IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v604y2006i1p192-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning for Postdisaster Resiliency

Author

Listed:
  • Philip R. Berke

    (Department of City and Regional Planning at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina Environmental Program)

  • Thomas J. Campanella

    (Department of City and Regional Planning at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC))

Abstract

The focus of this article is planning for resiliency in the aftermath of a catastrophe. First, the authors offer their conception of planning for resiliency as a goal for recovering communities, and the benefits of planning in efforts to create more resilient places. Next, they discuss major issues associated with planning for postdisaster recovery, including barriers posed by federal and state governments to planning for resiliency, the promise and risks of compact urban form models for guiding rebuilding, and the failure to involve citizens in planning for disasters. Finally, they discuss lessons from prior research that address these issues and policy recommendations that foster predisaster recovery planning for resilient communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip R. Berke & Thomas J. Campanella, 2006. "Planning for Postdisaster Resiliency," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 604(1), pages 192-207, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:604:y:2006:i:1:p:192-207
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716205285533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716205285533
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716205285533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raymond J. Burby, 2006. "Hurricane Katrina and the Paradoxes of Government Disaster Policy: Bringing About Wise Governmental Decisions for Hazardous Areas," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 604(1), pages 171-191, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang Hoon Oh & Jennifer Oetzel, 2022. "Multinational enterprises and natural disasters: Challenges and opportunities for IB research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(2), pages 231-254, March.
    2. Nabil Kamel, 2012. "Social Marginalisation, Federal Assistance and Repopulation Patterns in the New Orleans Metropolitan Area following Hurricane Katrina," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3211-3231, November.
    3. Mattia Bertin & Eugenia Vincenti, 2024. "Eco-Zip: Climate-Proofing an International Logistic Hub," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Mahtab Murshed & Manohar Chamana & Konrad Erich Kork Schmitt & Rabindra Bhatta & Olatunji Adeyanju & Stephen Bayne, 2023. "Design and Performance Analysis of a Grid-Connected Distributed Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Eric E. Calloway & Nadine B. Nugent & Katie L. Stern & Ashley Mueller & Amy L. Yaroch, 2022. "Lessons Learned from the 2019 Nebraska Floods: Implications for Emergency Management, Mass Care, and Food Security," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robin C. Van den Honert, 2016. "Improving Decision Making about Natural Disaster Mitigation Funding in Australia—A Framework," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Kyle Onda & Jordan Branham & Todd K BenDor & Nikhil Kaza & David Salvesen, 2020. "Does removal of federal subsidies discourage urban development? An evaluation of the US Coastal Barrier Resources Act," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Morgan J. Breen & Abiy S. Kebede & Carola S. König, 2022. "The Safe Development Paradox in Flood Risk Management: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Lena Junger & Severin Hohensinner & Karin Schroll & Klaus Wagner & Walter Seher, 2022. "Land Use in Flood-Prone Areas and Its Significance for Flood Risk Management—A Case Study of Alpine Regions in Austria," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Reckien, Diana & Buzasi, Attila & Olazabal, Marta & Spyridaki, Niki-Artemis & Eckersley, Peter & Simoes, Sofia G. & Salvia, Monica & Pietrapertosa, Filomena & Fokaides, Paris & Goonesekera, Sascha M. , 2023. "Quality of urban climate adaptation plans over time," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3, pages 1-14.
    6. Joshua Alan Lewis, 2023. "Pathologies of Porosity: Looming Transitions Along the Mississippi River Ship Channel," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 263-274.
    7. Nabil Kamel, 2012. "Social Marginalisation, Federal Assistance and Repopulation Patterns in the New Orleans Metropolitan Area following Hurricane Katrina," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3211-3231, November.
    8. Anna Christine Osland, 2015. "Building hazard resilience through collaboration: the role of technical partnerships in areas with hazardous liquid and natural gas transmission pipelines," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(5), pages 1063-1080, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:604:y:2006:i:1:p:192-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.