IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rvr/journl/20097550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les régions, porteuses de nouveaux compromis pour l’agriculture ?

Author

Listed:
  • Trouvé, Aurélie

Abstract

L’auteur remercie C. Laurent et M. Nieddu ainsi que les rapporteurs anonymes de la Revue de la régulation pour leurs critiques et suggestions qu’ils ont bien voulu adresser lors d’une version antérieure de ce texte. Elle reste seule responsable des erreurs et omissions qui pourraient subsister. Alors que la Politique agricole commune est profondément remise en cause, les régions européennes voient leurs marges de manœuvre renforcées. En l’absence d’un compromis stable à l’échelon européen répondant aux nouvelles demandes sociétales vis-à-vis de l’agriculture, celles-ci se trouvent-elles prises en compte par les politiques régionales, résultant de nouveaux compromis pour l’agriculture ? Cette idée est testée à travers l’analyse des rapports de pouvoir entre trois idéaux types d’intérêts divergents : néo-mercantiles, néo-libéraux et multifonctionnels. Les enquêtes de terrain réalisées dans huit régions britanniques, françaises et allemandes montrent que la régionalisation entraîne bien l’institutionnalisation de compromis régionaux distincts, mais qu’elle tend à reproduire les rapports de pouvoir dominants à l’échelle européenne, c’est-à-dire la persistance des intérêts néo-mercantiles, l’hégémonie des intérêts néo-libéraux et la non prise en compte des intérêts multifonctionnels.

Suggested Citation

  • Trouvé, Aurélie, 2009. "Les régions, porteuses de nouveaux compromis pour l’agriculture ?," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 5.
    • Handle: RePEc:rvr:journl:2009:7550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://regulation.revues.org/7550
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://regulation.revues.org/pdf/7550
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buckwell, Allan, 1997. "If . . . Agricultural Economics in a Brave Liberal World," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 24(3-4), pages 339-358.
    2. John Lovering, 2001. "The Coming Regional Crisis (And How To Avoid It)," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 349-354.
    3. Daniel Perraud, 2001. "Les politiques agricoles et rurales dans les régions: une nouvelle organisation des pouvoirs publics en Europe?," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 261(1), pages 7-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Mayerhofer & Oliver Fritz & Dieter Pennerstorfer, 2010. "Dritter Bericht zur internationalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Wiens," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 42430.
    2. Nasser Al‐Baimani & Nick Clifton & Eleri Jones & Rhiannon Pugh, 2021. "Applying the ecosystem model in a new context? The case of business incubation in Oman," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 663-686, June.
    3. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    4. Jon Swords, 2013. "Michael Porter’s cluster theory as a local and regional development tool: The rise and fall of cluster policy in the UK," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(4), pages 369-383, June.
    5. Shu-Yi Chi & Tsorng-Chyi Hwang & Li-Hsien Chien, 2023. "Business Policy and Competitiveness of Farmers’ Organizations—Empirical Evidence from Taiwan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Catherine Darrot & Gilles Maréchal & Thomas Bréger, 2019. "Rapport sur les Projets Alimentaires Territoriaux (P.A.T.) en France : Etat des lieux et analyse," Working Papers hal-02465471, HAL.
    7. Vasilis Angelis & Athanasios Angelis-Dimakis & Katerina Dimaki, 2016. "Identifying Clusters of Regions in the European South, based on their Economic, Social and Environmental Characteristics," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 3, pages 71-102.
    8. Mulatu, Abay, 2016. "On the concept of 'competitiveness' and its usefulness for policy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 50-62.
    9. Andy Pike & Peter O'Brien & John Tomaney, 2004. "Trade Unions in Local and Regional Development and Governance: The Northern Trades Union Congress in North East England," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 19(2), pages 102-116, May.
    10. Metaxas, Theodore, 2008. "Τοπική Οικονομκή Ανάπτυξη, Ιδιαίτερα Χαρακτηριστικά Πόλεων, Πολιτικές Ανάπτυξης Και Ανταγωνιστικότητα Επιχειρήσεων [Local economic development, cities' distinctive characteristics, development poli," MPRA Paper 41609, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Kenneth J. Thomson, 2001. "Agricultural Economics and Rural Development: Marriage or Divorce? Presidential Address," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1-10, September.
    12. Jari Ritsilä & Jukka Haukka, 2003. "The Role of Structural Funds in Developing Learning Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa03p1, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Evgeny V. Popov & Dmitry M. Kochetkov, 2019. "Developing the Regional Knowledge Economy Index: a Case of Russian Regions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(4), pages 1860-1878, December.
    14. Marielle Berriet-Solliec & Aurélie Trouvé, 2012. "Développement des territoires de projet : quels enjeux pour les politiques rurales ? / Territorial development projects: what issues for rural policies ?," INRA UMR CESAER Working Papers 2012/3, INRA UMR CESAER, Centre d'’Economie et Sociologie appliquées à l'’Agriculture et aux Espaces Ruraux.
    15. Edward J Malecki, 2007. "Cities and Regions Competing in the Global Economy: Knowledge and Local Development Policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(5), pages 638-654, October.
    16. Steven Schofield, 2002. "The Newlands Local Enterprise Project - A Case Study of Community Economic Development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 17(4), pages 328-334, November.
    17. Philip Boland, 2007. "Unpacking the Theory-Policy Interface of Local Economic Development: An Analysis of Cardiff and Liverpool," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(5-6), pages 1019-1039, May.
    18. Nikolaos Kapitsinis & Theodore Metaxas, 2012. "Territorial Competition: Theories, arguments, policies and lessons of the last 25 years," ERSA conference papers ersa12p947, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Graham Pearce & Sarah Ayres, 2009. "Governance in the English Regions: The Role of the Regional Development Agencies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(3), pages 537-557, March.
    20. KAPITSINIS, Nikolaos & METAXAS, Theodore & DUQUENNE, Marie Noelle, 2013. "Exploring The Coherence And The Meaning Of Territorial Competition: Do National States Behave In The Same Way As Firms In Case Of Default?. The Cases Of Greece And Dubai," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 13(2), pages 57-72.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Politiques agricoles; régions européennes; Théorie de la régulation; Agricultural policies; European Regions; Regulation Theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rvr:journl:2009:7550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pascal Seppecher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://theorie-regulation.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.