IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rss/jnljbs/v1i2p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Port Management Systems in the Evolution of an Efficient Port Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Chinedum Onyemechi
  • Lazarus Okoroji

Abstract

The paper reviewed the various efforts made in recent years at integrating activities in the port system. Among these include vessel traffic management systems, vessel traffic management and information systems, simulation systems, supply chain management systems in the harbour environment and other systems management techniques. The work identified the following agents as active participants in the port system. The ship agent, the berth agent, the yard agent, the gate agent with the transtainer agent and the transport agent acting as sub agents. Other classification terms for agents found in the work includes the identification of physical agents in the port system and their interactive relationships. The physical agents thus identified in the port system includes: the supplier, the Harbour, the ship, the distributor and the customer, while, the logical agents includes the order agent, the logistics agent, the scheduling agent, the resource agent and the transportation agent. The identified agents were then applied to study the interactions between the following port system components of: port approach management, quayside/ Berth operations management, Documentations/information systems management, Marshalling area/ Land transport management and then ware housing/ cargo release management. Performance measurement techniques leading to the evolution of efficient port policies were applied in the study of the Nigerian port system. Areas requiring additional policy measures were identified. Applied measurement techniques includes container dwell time analysis, cargo through put forcasting based on historical data, ship berthing time analysis, equipment availability studies, cargo in-transit-time analysis and their contribution towards the development of efficient port management policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Chinedum Onyemechi & Lazarus Okoroji, 2015. "Integrated Port Management Systems in the Evolution of an Efficient Port Policy," Quarterly Journal of Business Studies, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 55-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:rss:jnljbs:v1i2p1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rassweb.org/admin/pages/ResearchPapers/Paper%201_1495887410.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beamon, Benita M., 1998. "Supply chain design and analysis:: Models and methods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 281-294, August.
    2. Yun, Won Young & Choi, Yong Seok, 1999. "A simulation model for container-terminal operation analysis using an object-oriented approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 221-230, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Na, Ung Jin & Shinozuka, Masanobu, 2009. "Simulation-based seismic loss estimation of seaport transportation system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 722-731.
    2. Ogulin, R. & Selen, W. & Ashayeri, J., 2010. "Determinants of Informal Coordination in Networked Supply Chains," Discussion Paper 2010-133, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Rich, Karl M. & Ross, R. Brent & Baker, A. Derek & Negassa, Asfaw, 2011. "Quantifying value chain analysis in the context of livestock systems in developing countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 214-222, April.
    4. García Cáceres, Rafael Guillermo & Aráoz Durand, Julián Arturo & Gómez, Fernando Palacios, 2009. "Integral analysis method - IAM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 891-903, February.
    5. repec:tkp:ijsrsy:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:73-91 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Monideepa Tarafdar & Sufian Qrunfleh, 2017. "Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 925-938, February.
    7. Lin Hu & Qinghai Chen & Tingting Yang & Chuanjian Yi & Jing Chen, 2024. "Visualization and Analysis of Hotspots and Trends in Seafood Cold Chain Logistics Based on CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and RStudio Bibliometrix," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Giachetti, Ronald E. & Martinez, Luis D. & Saenz, Oscar A. & Chen, Chin-Sheng, 2003. "Analysis of the structural measures of flexibility and agility using a measurement theoretical framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 47-62, October.
    9. Fleisch, Elgar & Tellkamp, Christian, 2005. "Inventory inaccuracy and supply chain performance: a simulation study of a retail supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 373-385, March.
    10. Olivares-Benitez, Elias & Ríos-Mercado, Roger Z. & González-Velarde, José Luis, 2013. "A metaheuristic algorithm to solve the selection of transportation channels in supply chain design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 161-172.
    11. László Duma, 2009. "Managerial Problem Solving in Logistics: How to Bridge Practice and Methodology," Working Paper Series 0906, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    12. Hatem Elleuch & Wafik Hachicha & Habib Chabchoub, 2014. "A combined approach for supply chain risk management: description and application to a real hospital pharmaceutical case study," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 641-663, May.
    13. Luís Alberto Godinho Coelho & Rui Manuel Mendes Mansidão, 2014. "Logistics Performance: a Theoretical Conceptual Model for Small and Medium Enterprises," CEFAGE-UE Working Papers 2014_12, University of Evora, CEFAGE-UE (Portugal).
    14. Samir Elhedhli & Jean-Louis Goffin, 2005. "Efficient Production-Distribution System Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(7), pages 1151-1164, July.
    15. Dana Marsetiya Utama & Fakhrina Fahma Abdullah & Ikhlasul Amallynda & Teguh Baroto, 2024. "Integrated production-inventory model for multi-item raw materials with exponential quality degradation: a real case study," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(4), pages 1862-1887, December.
    16. Perroni, Marcos G. & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Vieira da Silva, Wesley & Tortato, Ubiratã, 2018. "Measuring energy performance: A process based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 540-553.
    17. Tsai, Kune-muh & Wang, Shan-chi, 2009. "Multi-site available-to-promise modeling for assemble-to-order manufacturing: An illustration on TFT-LCD manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 174-184, January.
    18. Ivanov, Dmitry & Sokolov, Boris & Kaeschel, Joachim, 2010. "A multi-structural framework for adaptive supply chain planning and operations control with structure dynamics considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 409-420, January.
    19. Marzieh ShahmariChatghieh & Harri Haapasalo & Anyanitha Distanont, 2013. "A Comparison of R&D Supply Chains and Service and Manufacturing Supply Chains," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 2(2), pages 73-91.
    20. Belieres, Simon & Hewitt, Mike & Jozefowiez, Nicolas & Semet, Frédéric & Van Woensel, Tom, 2020. "A Benders decomposition-based approach for logistics service network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 523-537.
    21. Lang Liu & Yutao Pu & Zhenwei Liu & Junjie Liu, 2023. "Analysis of Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Efficiency under Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rss:jnljbs:v1i2p1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danish Khalil (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rassweb.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.