IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsr/supplm/v61y2013i4p12-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dimitrie Cantemir – The First Shaper of Romanian Statistical Thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Gheorghe SAVOIU

    (University of Pitesti)

  • Constantin MANEA

    (University of Pitesti)

Abstract

This paper is devoted to a spark of genius, a brainwave derived from Dimitrie Cantemir’s inexhaustible thinking; among numberless other facets of that huge personality endowed with exceptional intellectual ability, also counts his capacity as the first shaper of Romanian statistical thinking, noticeable not so much in his often invoked’Descriptio Moldaviae’, but especially his work, usually considered exclusively a philosophical book,’The Divan or the Argument of the Wise Man with the World’. The paper summarizes, after a short introduction of bibliographic nature, the main features of the great scholar’s personality of a shaper or moulder of a Romanian school of statistical thinking, for all who read and understood him, for several centuries, after the publication, on 30 August 1698, of his aforementioned work, as an exercise in statistical thinking in the main, and only secondarily as an exericse of philosophical thought – a work considered to hold a special wisdom and breathtaking originality even today, in its inimitable depth and its objective and consistent vision.

Suggested Citation

  • Gheorghe SAVOIU & Constantin MANEA, 2013. "Dimitrie Cantemir – The First Shaper of Romanian Statistical Thinking," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 61(4), pages 12-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:61:y:2013:i:4:p:12-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistadestatistica.ro/suplimente/2013/4_2013/srrs4_2013a02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. J. Wild & M. Pfannkuch, 1999. "Statistical Thinking in Empirical Enquiry," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 67(3), pages 223-248, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Muñiz-Rodríguez & Luis J. Rodríguez-Muñiz & Ángel Alsina, 2020. "Deficits in the Statistical and Probabilistic Literacy of Citizens: Effects in a World in Crisis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Seokmin Kang & Sungyeun Kim, 2022. "Lessons Learned from Topic Modeling Analysis of COVID-19 News to Enrich Statistics Education in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Jesús Guadalupe Lugo-Armenta & Luis Roberto Pino-Fan, 2021. "Inferential Reasoning of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers on the Chi-Square Statistic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Anand Desai, 2008. "Quantitative methods, economics, and or models," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 640-669.
    5. Heejoo Suh & Sohyung Kim & Seonyoung Hwang & Sunyoung Han, 2020. "Enhancing Preservice Teachers’ Key Competencies for Promoting Sustainability in a University Statistics Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Joel B. Greenhouse & Howard J. Seltman, 2018. "On Teaching Statistical Practice: From Novice to Expert," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(2), pages 147-154, April.
    7. Claudia Vásquez & Israel García-Alonso & María José Seckel & Ángel Alsina, 2021. "Education for Sustainable Development in Primary Education Textbooks—An Educational Approach from Statistical and Probabilistic Literacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Claudia Vásquez & Ángel Alsina, 2021. "Analysing Probability Teaching Practices in Primary Education: What Tasks Do Teachers Implement?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Jenna Hicks & Jessica Dewey & Yaniv Brandvain & Anita Schuchardt, 2020. "Development of the Biological Variation In Experimental Design And Analysis (BioVEDA) assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Săvoiu, Gheorghe, 2008. "The scientifiv way of thinking in statistics, statistical physics and quantum mechanics," MPRA Paper 13558, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Patricia Belén Carrera & Luis R. Pino-Fan & Hugo Alvarado & Jesús Guadalupe Lugo-Armenta, 2021. "Practices of the Random Variable Proposed in the Chilean Mathematics Curriculum of Secondary Education," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-26, October.
    12. Ricardo Ocaña-Riola, 2016. "The Use of Statistics in Health Sciences: Situation Analysis and Perspective," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 8(2), pages 204-219, October.
    13. Maria Penna & Mirian Agus & Maribel Peró-Cebollero & Joan Guàrdia-Olmos & Eliano Pessa, 2014. "The use of imagery in statistical reasoning by university undergraduate students: a preliminary study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 173-187, January.
    14. Joan Franco Seguí & Ángel Alsina & Claudia Vásquez, 2024. "Teaching Statistics for Sustainability across Contexts: Exploring the Knowledge and Beliefs of Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Idris Djouahra, 2022. "Conceptual understanding of linear regression among economics students at the university center of Tipaza, Algeria," Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 66-83, December.
    16. Gheorghe SAVOIU, 2012. "A Philosophical Introduction to the History of Statistics’ Conceptualization," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 60(2), pages 111-119, May.
    17. Roger W. Hoerl & Ronald D. Snee, 2017. "Statistical Engineering: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 209-219, July.
    18. Theresa Büchter & Andreas Eichler & Nicole Steib & Karin Binder & Katharina Böcherer-Linder & Stefan Krauss & Markus Vogel, 2022. "How to Train Novices in Bayesian Reasoning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-31, May.
    19. Katja Prevodnik & Vasja Vehovar, 2014. "Presenting dynamics of social phenomena: should we use absolute, relative or time differences?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 799-816, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:61:y:2013:i:4:p:12-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrian Visoiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.