IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rampas/v2018y2018i30p82-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness Of Monitoring Mechanisms And Mitigation Of Fraud Incidents In The Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Kamaliah KAMALIAH

    (Faculty of Economics; Universitas Riau; Indonesia)

  • Noor-Syazana MARJUNI

    (Faculty of Accountancy; UniversitiTeknologi MARA; Malaysia)

  • Norhayati MOHAMED

    (Faculty of Accountancy; UniversitiTeknologi MARA; Malaysia)

  • Zuraidah MOHD-SANUSI

    (Accounting Research Institute & Faculty of Accountancy; UniversitiTeknologi MARA; Malaysia)

  • Rita ANUGERAH

    (Faculty of Economics; Universitas Riau; Indonesia)

Abstract

Fraud in the public sector continues to be the major issue for the governments worldwide. Thus, this study examines the extent of monitoring mechanisms within public systems curbing fraud incidents. The authors’ survey concerned three dimensions of monitoring mechanisms: good governance, internal control procedures and fraud prevention programs. This survey has been conducted among various Malaysian government officers. The results show that, generally, misappropriation of assets is ranked as the most frequent fraudulent case in government agencies. Based on regression analysis, internal procedures or policies were significant in reducing fraud incidents. Additionally, both good governance and fraud prevention programs were proven to have a significant relationship with the occurrences of fraud within government agencies. In terms of the practical aspect, the study provides important information for public servants on the effectiveness and usefulness of good governance, internal control procedures, and fraud prevention program in the public sector. This paper provides an interesting contribution to the understanding of fraud incidents inside government agencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamaliah KAMALIAH & Noor-Syazana MARJUNI & Norhayati MOHAMED & Zuraidah MOHD-SANUSI & Rita ANUGERAH, 2018. "Effectiveness Of Monitoring Mechanisms And Mitigation Of Fraud Incidents In The Public Sector," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(30), pages 82-95, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2018:y:2018:i:30:p:82-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ramp.ase.ro/_data/files/articole/2018/30-06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohd Hassan Che Haat & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Sakthi Mahenthiran, 2008. "Corporate governance, transparency and performance of Malaysian companies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(8), pages 744-778, September.
    2. W. Steve Albrecht & Ned C. Hill & Conan C. Albrecht, 2006. "The Ethics Development Model Applied To Declining Ethics in Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(38), pages 30-40, March.
    3. Thomas Clarke, 2004. "Cycles of Crisis and Regulation: the enduring agency and stewardship problems of corporate governance," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 153-161, April.
    4. Philip Law, 2011. "Corporate governance and no fraud occurrence in organizations: Hong Kong evidence," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(6), pages 501-518, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mwangi Severinah Wanjiru & James Ndegwa, 2020. "The Influence of Fraud Risk Management on Fraud Occurrence in Kenyan listed Companies," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(4), pages 147-160, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gad Jacek, 2020. "The association between disclosures on control system over financial reporting and mechanisms of corporate governance: Empirical evidence from Germany and Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 56(4), pages 351-369, December.
    2. Huang, Jiashun & Li, Weiping & Guo, Lijia & Hall, Jim W., 2022. "Information and communications technology infrastructure and firm growth: An empirical study of China's cities," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3).
    3. Rahayati Ahmad & Roshima Said & Syahiza Arsad, 2017. "The Board Governance Mechanism and the Effect of Concentration Ownership on Malaysia Companies Performance," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 757-768, February.
    4. Monica Ramos Montesdeoca & Agustín J. Sánchez Medina & Felix Blázquez Santana, 2019. "Research Topics in Accounting Fraud in the 21st Century: A State of the Art," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, March.
    5. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:49-58 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Tahir Akhtar & Mohammad Ali Tareq & Kashif Rashid, 2021. "Chief Executive Officers’ monitoring, board effectiveness, managerial ownership, and cash holdings: evidence from ASEAN," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(8), pages 2193-2238, November.
    7. Robyn A Davidson Author_Email: NIL, 2011. "Ethics! Teaching Ethics To Accounting Students," Annual Summit on Business and Entrepreneurial Studies (ASBES 2011) Proceeding 2011-018-146, Conference Master Resources.
    8. Ruchi Agarwal, 2018. "A multiple perspective view to rampant fraudulent culture in the Indian insurance industry," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(4), pages 416-437.
    9. Karen Benson & Peter M Clarkson & Tom Smith & Irene Tutticci, 2015. "A review of accounting research in the Asia Pacific region," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(1), pages 36-88, February.
    10. Muhammad Khan & Hee Yong Lee & Jung Han Bae, 2019. "The Role of Transparency in Humanitarian Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Dayana Mastura Baharudin, 2019. "Board Remuneration Transparency: A Pre and Post Analysis of MCCG 2017," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 108-121, December.
    12. Holm, Claus & Schøler, Finn, 2008. "Reduction of Asymmetric Information through Corporate Governance Mechanisms : The Importance of Ownership Dispersion and International," Accounting Research Center Working Papers A-2008-02, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies.
    13. Mohd Azmi Mohd Noor Author_Email: mnmazmi@ tm.com.my & Dr. Faudziah Hanim Bt Fadzil, 2011. "Influence Of Corporate Governance Attributes On Firms’ Financial Performance In Malaysia," Annual Summit on Business and Entrepreneurial Studies (ASBES 2011) Proceeding 2011-039-124, Conference Master Resources.
    14. Imaobong Nnam & Nnajiofor Eneh, 2018. "Risk Assessment: A Fight against Fraud in Nigerian Organizations," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(7), pages 136-147, July.
    15. Rehman Ali & Hashim Fathyah, 2020. "Impact of Fraud Risk Assessment on Good Corporate Governance: Case of Public Listed Companies in Oman," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 16-30, March.
    16. Rajat Deb, 2018. "Financial Audit or Forensic Audit? Government Sector Panorama," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 11(2), pages 135-158, December.
    17. Cristina Alexandrina Stefanescu, 2013. "How Do Ownership Features Affect Corporate Governance Disclosure ? - The Case of Banking System," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 9(2), pages 37-51, April.
    18. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:170-182 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Kogilavani Apadore & Siti Subaryani Binti Zainol, 2014. "Determinants of Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance among Consumer Product Industry in Malaysia: A Theoretical Model," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(2), pages 159-165, April.
    20. Gratiela Georgiana Noja & Mirela Cristea & Cecilia Nicoleta Jurcut & Alexandru Buglea & Ion Lala Popa, 2020. "Management Financial Incentives and Firm Performance in a Sustainable Development Framework: Empirical Evidence from European Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    21. Richard Akisimire & Muhsin Salim Masoud & Mutahyoba D Baisi & Laura A Orobia, 2016. "Board Member Age Diversity and Financial Performance of Manufacturing Firms: A Developing Economy Perspective," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(5), pages 120-132.
    22. Tahir Akhtar & Mohammad Ali Tareq & Kashif Rashid, 2023. "The role of shareholders and creditors' rights in affecting cash holdings and firm value: A recent evidence from ASEAN," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 929-961, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fraud incidents; good governance; internal control procedures; fraud prevention programs; monitoring mechanisms.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2018:y:2018:i:30:p:82-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Androniceanu Armenia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.