IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v8y2014i1p718-726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ROMANIA’S R&D AND INNOVATION POTENTIAL AT EU LEVEL AND THE MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Victor LAVRIC

Abstract

This paper aims to assess Romania’s R&D and innovation potential within the European context, and to identify the main managerial implications for SMEs that result from the analysis. In order to do so, we have compared the trends emphasized by the classical assessment of R&D and innovation and those underlined by the changes in the volume of productive knowledge that is implied in the export structure – i.e. the economic complexity index. As a result, we managed to identify a strong positive correlation between the growth rates of the GDP per capita and the economic complexity index during 1995 – 2012, as well as the fact that there are two main groups of states whose economic complexity has grown: the Baltic and the Central European countries. Therefore, it can be argued that there are some forces that make the medium and long term perspective of Romania, in terms of R&D and innovation, look much better than the simple extrapolation of the latest trends regarding the R&D personnel and gross expenditures. Although the amount of the societal know-how is critical for R&D and innovation, making it easier to start entrepreneurial activities with high degree of novelty and innovation, the accumulation and retention of knowledge is a quite costly encounter for SMEs. As a consequence, there are some major managerial implications for SMEs that result from the analysis of the Romania’s R&D and innovation potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor LAVRIC, 2014. "ROMANIA’S R&D AND INNOVATION POTENTIAL AT EU LEVEL AND THE MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR SMEs," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 718-726, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:718-726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2014/pdf/70.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor LAVRIC, 2013. "The Dynamics Of R&D Human Resources In Romania Within The European Context," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 259-267, November.
    2. Victor Lavric, 2012. "The Dynamics Of R&D Activities In Romania Within The European Context," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(1), pages 648-654, November.
    3. Dong, Jing & Gou, Yan-nan, 2010. "Corporate governance structure, managerial discretion, and the R&D investment in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 180-188, April.
    4. Aerts, Kris & Schmidt, Tobias, 2008. "Two for the price of one?: Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 806-822, June.
    5. Lin, Chen & Lin, Ping & Song, Frank M. & Li, Chuntao, 2011. "Managerial incentives, CEO characteristics and corporate innovation in China's private sector," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 176-190, June.
    6. Kesavayuth, Dusanee & Zikos, Vasileios, 2012. "Upstream and downstream horizontal R&D networks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 742-750.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Victor LAVRIC, 2015. "Specific mechanisms for stimulating R&D investments within the EU," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 3(4), pages 61-76, November.
    2. Popa Ion & Lavric Victor, 2013. "Highly Important Objectives For Innovation In Romania Within The European Context," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1588-1594, July.
    3. Victor LAVRIC, 2013. "The Dynamics Of R&D Human Resources In Romania Within The European Context," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 259-267, November.
    4. POPA Ion & LAVRIC Victor, 2013. "Managerial Methods Stimulating New Ideas Or Creativity In Romania Wihin The European Context," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 65(6), pages 128-138.
    5. Victor Lavric, 2012. "The Dynamics Of R&D Activities In Romania Within The European Context," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(1), pages 648-654, November.
    6. Wang, Yizhong & Wei, Yueling & Song, Frank M., 2017. "Uncertainty and corporate R&D investment: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 176-200.
    7. Liu, Xiaolu & Li, Xiaoyu & Li, Honglin, 2016. "R&D subsidies and business R&D: Evidence from high-tech manufacturing firms in Jiangsu," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-22.
    8. Lutao Ning & Martha Prevezer & Yuandi Wang, 2014. "Top Management Turnover and Corporate Governance in China: effects on innovation performance," Working Papers 53, Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research.
    9. Shi, Xing & Wu, Yanrui, 2017. "The effect of internal and external factors on innovative behaviour of Chinese manufacturing firms," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(S), pages 50-64.
    10. Chang-Yang Lee & Ji-Hwan Lee & Ajai S. Gaur, 2017. "Are large business groups conducive to industry innovation? The moderating role of technological appropriability," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 313-337, June.
    11. Brautzsch, Hans-Ulrich & Günther, Jutta & Loose, Brigitte & Ludwig, Udo & Nulsch, Nicole, 2015. "Can R&D subsidies counteract the economic crisis? – Macroeconomic effects in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 623-633.
    12. Sergio Afcha & Jose García-Quevedo, 2016. "The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(6), pages 955-975.
    13. Yousaf, Umair Bin & Ullah, Irfan & Jiang, Junchen & Wang, Man, 2022. "The role of board capital in driving green innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    14. Zhang, Cui, 2017. "Political connections and corporate environmental responsibility: Adopting or escaping?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 539-547.
    15. George A Shinkle & Jo-Ann Suchard, 2019. "Innovation in newly public firms: The influence of government grants, venture capital, and private equity," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(2), pages 248-281, May.
    16. Zhang, Xiaobei & Wang, Xiaojun, 2021. "Measures of human capital and the mechanics of economic growth," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Nadia Loukil & Ouidad Yousfi, 2022. "Do CEO’s traits matter in innovation outcomes?," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 375-403, September.
    18. Talavera, Oleksandr & Yin, Shuxing & Zhang, Mao, 2021. "Tournament incentives, age diversity and firm performance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 139-162.
    19. Chen, Shenglan & Lin, Bingxuan & Lu, Rui & Ma, Hui, 2016. "Pay for accounting performance and R&D investment: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 142-153.
    20. Tobias Schmidt & Julia Le Blanc, 2017. "Do homeowners save more? – Evidence from the Panel on Household Finances (PHF)," ERES eres2017_110, European Real Estate Society (ERES).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:718-726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.