IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v8y2014i1p598-605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Concept Of Information In Contemporary Economic Analysis €“ An Economic Approach Of Informational Goods

Author

Listed:
  • Minodora URSACESCU
  • Mihai CIOC

Abstract

The concept of information as we use it in everyday in the sense knowledge communicated plays a central role in today's society. The concept became particularly predominant since end of World War II with the widespread use of computer networks. Given the central position of information in the New Economy, its approach is made from the economic theory angle. Although the information is an economic good which can be produced, consumed, buy and sell, the classical demand and supply laws do not apply in case of information. A lot of questions arise in this context: which is the cost of producing information? Which is the cost of acquiring? Which is its value? Is there a price of information like other commodities that are sold? Economic activity involves making decisions. In order to make decisions, agents need information. Thus, the problem of acquisition, transmission, and uses of information has been occupying the economists’ attention for some time now. Some studies argue, in fact, that information should not be treated in economic analyses as a traditionally economic good. The purpose of this paper is to present insights from economics research the nature of information. Economic categories of cost and value are approached to evaluate the information as economic good. The cost structure of an information, and also its value is reflected to show that they are unusual compared to material goods or commodities.

Suggested Citation

  • Minodora URSACESCU & Mihai CIOC, 2014. "The Concept Of Information In Contemporary Economic Analysis €“ An Economic Approach Of Informational Goods," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 598-605, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:598-605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2014/pdf/59.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:cbooks:9780511771576 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Huffman, Wallace E., 2009. "Does information change behavior?," ISU General Staff Papers 200911020800001150, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Quah, Danny, 2003. "Digital Goods and the New Economy," CEPR Discussion Papers 3846, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Quah, Danny, 2003. "Digital goods and the new economy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 2236, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Jean‐Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2006. "Two‐sided markets: a progress report," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(3), pages 645-667, September.
    6. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2000. "The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 115(4), pages 1441-1478.
    7. Easley,David & Kleinberg,Jon, 2010. "Networks, Crowds, and Markets," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521195331, October.
    8. Joseph M. Ostroy & Louis Makowski, 2001. "Perfect Competition and the Creativity of the Market," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 39(2), pages 479-535, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Vogelsang, 2010. "Dynamics of two-sided internet markets," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 129-145, May.
    2. Sebastian von Engelhardt & Sushmita Swaminathan, 2008. "Open Source Software, Closed Source Software or Both: Impacts on Industry Growth and the Role of Intellectual Property Rights," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 799, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Saul Estrin & Susanna Khavul & Mike Wright, 2022. "Soft and hard information in equity crowdfunding: network effects in the digitalization of entrepreneurial finance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1761-1781, April.
    4. Lei Huang & Yandong Zhao & Liang Mei & Peiyi Wu & Zhihua Zhao & Yijun Mao, 2019. "Structural Holes in the Multi-Sided Market: A Market Allocation Structure Analysis of China’s Car-Hailing Platform in the Context of Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Cheng, Chih-Yang & Chien, Mei-Se & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2021. "ICT diffusion, financial development, and economic growth: An international cross-country analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 662-671.
    6. Maurseth, Per Botolf, 2018. "The effect of the Internet on economic growth: Counter-evidence from cross-country panel data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 74-77.
    7. Patrick Legros, 2005. "Art and the Internet: Blessing the Curse?," Levine's Bibliography 666156000000000502, UCLA Department of Economics.
    8. W. Erwin Diewert & Takanobu Nakajima & Alice Nakamura & Emi Nakamura & Masao Nakamura, 2011. "Returns to scale: concept, estimation and analysis of Japan's turbulent 1964–88 economy," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 451-485, May.
    9. Heatley, David & Howell, Bronwyn, 2009. "The Brand is the Bundle - Strategies for the Mobile Ecosystem," Working Paper Series 4038, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    10. Chudnovsky, Daniel & López, Andrés & Rossi, Martín & Ubfal, Diego, 2006. "Evaluating a Program of Public Funding of Scientific Activity: A Case Study of FONCYT in Argentina," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 2831, Inter-American Development Bank.
    11. Pasquale Giungato & Roberto Rana & Angela Tarabella & Caterina Tricase, 2017. "Current Trends in Sustainability of Bitcoins and Related Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-11, November.
    12. Sepehrdoust, Hamid & Zamani Shabkhaneh, Saber, 2018. "How knowledge base factors change natural resource curse to economic growth?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 149-154.
    13. Hamed Tajedin & Hamed Tajedin & Mohammad Keyhani, 2019. "A Theory of Digital Firm-Designed Markets: Defying Knowledge Constraints with Crowds and Marketplaces," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 323-342, December.
    14. Mohammad Ali MORADI & Meysam KEBRYAEE, 2009. "Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Economic Growth in Selected Islamic Countries," EcoMod2009 21500068, EcoMod.
    15. Milan Zafirovski, 2024. "Distributive justice revisited in a comparative setting: the fairness of wages in OECD countries and modalities of society," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-44, January.
    16. Luigi Marengo, 2019. "Is this time different? A note on automation and labour in the fourth industrial revolution," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(3), pages 323-331, September.
    17. Luigi Marengo, 2020. "How much will the vaccine cost (if ever discovered….)," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(3), pages 511-517, September.
    18. Muazu Ibrahim & Yakubu Awudu Sare & Ibrahim Osman Adam, 2021. "An application of frequency domain approach to the causal nexus between information, communication and technology infrastructure and financial development in selected countries in Africa," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 1206-1235, January.
    19. Marengo, Luigi & Pasquali, Corrado, 2006. "Non rivalry and complementarity in computer software," MPRA Paper 25589, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Steven G. Medema, 2020. "The Coase Theorem at Sixty," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1045-1128, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:598-605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.