IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v13y2019i1p409-416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Knowledge Of The Leniency Policy At The Level Of The Management Of Companies Operating In Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Andreea-Florina FORA
  • Liana-Eugenia ME?TER
  • Nicoleta Georgeta BUGNAR

Abstract

At the level of the European Union, the defensive attitude adopted by the authorities when it comes to competition policy is very well known. The clearest proof is the existence of the leniency policy from the cartels legislation. In the EU, leniency is intensely used when we consider cartel investigations. On the other hand, in Romania, the situation is completely opposite, regarding leniency. Starting from this reality, we wanted to investigate the causes of this situation. We wish to find out why the management of companies operating on the territory of Romania doesn’t consider leniency when involved in a cartel. The research methodology of this paper consists of applying a questionnaire to companies operating in Romania. The questions of the questionnaire were designed in such a way that we can identify the reasons why the companies that operate in Romania are reluctant to use the leniency policy. The results of the study were surprising, most of the interviewed companies didn’t know that this leniency policy exists and after being explained how this policy works, all the companies stated that if they were in a cartel they would appeal to the leniency. The results of the present study allowed us to make a series of recommendations to the Romanian competition authorities regarding the way in which it makes known the leniency policy among the companies operating on the Romanian market.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreea-Florina FORA & Liana-Eugenia ME?TER & Nicoleta Georgeta BUGNAR, 2019. "The Knowledge Of The Leniency Policy At The Level Of The Management Of Companies Operating In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 409-416, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:409-416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2019/pdf/2_14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini (ed.), 2018. "Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume II," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 17978.
    2. Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini (ed.), 2018. "Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume I," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16873.
    3. Marini, Marco A. & Corchon, Luis, 2016. "Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization: An Introduction," MPRA Paper 77169, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markus Dertwinkel-Kalt & Jonas Frey, 2020. "Optimal Stopping in a Dynamic Salience Model," CESifo Working Paper Series 8496, CESifo.
    2. José L Moraga-González & Zsolt Sándor & Matthijs R Wildenbeest, 2021. "Simultaneous Search for Differentiated Products: The Impact of Search Costs and Firm Prominence," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(635), pages 1308-1330.
    3. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A. & Saulle, Riccardo D., 2020. "Cartel formation with quality differentiation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 36-50.
    4. Mikhail Drugov & Dmitry Ryvkin, 2019. "The shape of luck and competition in tournaments," Working Papers w0251, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    5. BELLEFLAMME Paul, & LAMBERT Thomas, & SCHWIENBACHER Armin,, 2019. "Crowdfunding dynamics," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2019014, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. René Kirkegaard, 2020. "Microfounded Contest Design," Working Papers 2003, University of Guelph, Department of Economics and Finance.
    7. Choi Kangsik & Lee Ki-Dong & Lim Seonyoung, 2020. "Managerial Delegation of Competing Vertical Chains with Vertical Externality," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Winand Emons & Severin Lenhard, 2020. "Rebating Antitrust Fines to Encourage Private Damages Actions," Diskussionsschriften dp2002, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    9. Ryvkin, Dmitry & Drugov, Mikhail, 2020. "The shape of luck and competition in winner-take-all tournaments," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(4), November.
    10. José Manuel Ordóñez-de-Haro & Jordi Perdiguero & Juan-Luis Jiménez, 2020. "Fuel prices at petrol stations in touristic cities," Tourism Economics, , vol. 26(1), pages 45-69, February.
    11. Bos, Iwan & Marini, Marco A., 2019. "Cartel stability under quality differentiation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 70-73.
    12. Kenan Huremović, 2021. "A noncooperative model of contest network formation," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 23(2), pages 275-317, April.
    13. Rouskas, Evangelos, 2020. "A model of sales with a large number of sellers," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 68-70.
    14. Magnus Hoffmann & Grégoire Rota‐Graziosi, 2020. "Endogenous timing in the presence of non‐monotonicities," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 359-402, February.
    15. Iwan Bos & Marco A. Marini, 2022. "Collusion in quality‐segmented markets," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(2), pages 293-323, April.
    16. Alessandro Tavoni & Ralph Winkler, 2021. "Domestic Pressure and International Climate Cooperation," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 225-243, October.
    17. repec:diw:diwwpp:dp1835 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Motta, Massimo & Tarantino, Emanuele, 2021. "The effect of horizontal mergers, when firms compete in prices and investments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    19. Michael Kopel & Eva Maria Putz, 2021. "Sharing managerial contract information in a vertically related market," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 1037-1047, June.
    20. Lorenzo Cerboni Baiardi & Ahmad K. Naimzada, 2018. "An evolutionary model with best response and imitative rules," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 41(2), pages 313-333, November.
    21. Joseph Hickey, 2023. "Simple model of market share dynamics based on clients' firm-switching decisions," Papers 2304.08727, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:409-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.