IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v11y2017i1p414-427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restructuring Processes And Crisis Management - Relevant Concepts And Their Import In Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel COSTEA
  • Stefan Catalin POPA
  • Florentina ALBU

Abstract

The paper aims to analyse certain fundamental concepts linked to the restructuring and crisis management processes and the manner such concepts were reflected and evolved in the local business and legal environment. The paper also analyses the historical evolution of the restructuring processes in Romania both at the institutional level (privatization methods and some of their effects) and in relation to insolvency procedure with the purpose of defining the most relevant concepts. The methodology used is based on using the comparative, historical and logical research tools. The results of the paper point out the relevance of the concepts used by practitioners and turnaround managers when undertaking leading roles in restructuring and crisis situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel COSTEA & Stefan Catalin POPA & Florentina ALBU, 2017. "Restructuring Processes And Crisis Management - Relevant Concepts And Their Import In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 414-427, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:414-427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2017/pdf/2_19.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williamson, John, 2000. "What Should the World Bank Think about the Washington Consensus?," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 15(2), pages 251-264, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Hundt, 2005. "A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 242-260.
    2. Suárez, Sandra L., 2016. "Poor people׳s money: The politics of mobile money in Mexico and Kenya," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 945-955.
    3. Klara Sabirianova Peter & Jan Svejnar & Katherine Terrell, 2012. "Foreign Investment, Corporate Ownership, and Development: Are Firms in Emerging Markets Catching Up to the World Standard?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(4), pages 981-999, November.
    4. Peter Howard-Jones & Jens Hölscher, 2020. "The Influence Of The Washington Consensus Programme On The Transitional Economies Of Eastern Europe – A Firm-Level Analysis," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 65(226), pages 9-44, July – Se.
    5. György, László & Veress, József, 2013. "The Possible Causes of and Means of Avoiding External Financial Vulnerability – Hungary versus Singapore," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 58(1), pages 53-75.
    6. Lapeyre, Frédéric,, 2004. "Globalization and structural adjustment as a development tool," ILO Working Papers 993733873402676, International Labour Organization.
    7. Harish, Nikki & Plouffe, Michael, 2018. "The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries," OSF Preprints chzpq, Center for Open Science.
    8. Frederic B. Jennings Jr., 2012. "A theory of planning horizons (1): market design in a post-neoclassical world," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 5(2), pages 5-37, May.
    9. Mwangi S. Kimenyi, 2006. "Economic Reforms and Pro-Poor Growth: Lessons for Africa and other Developing Regions and Economies in Transition," Working papers 2006-02, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    10. Peter Söderbaum, 2012. "Pluralism and sustainable development," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 23-39.
    11. Hanlon, Joseph, 2017. "Following the donor-designed path to Mozambique’s US$2.2 billion secret debt deal," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68130, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Tarp, Finn, 2003. "Udviklingsbistanden i perspektiv," Nationaløkonomisk tidsskrift, Nationaløkonomisk Forening, vol. 2003(1), pages 164-186.
    13. Yooneui Kim & Youngwan Kim, 2021. "The autonomy of international organizations? The analysis of major powers’ influence over the World Bank’s aid policies," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(3), pages 224-240, September.
    14. Daniela Gabor, 2021. "The Wall Street Consensus," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 429-459, May.
    15. Birdsall, Nancy & de la Torre, Augusto & Caicedo, Felipe Valencia, 2010. "The Washington consensus : assessing a damaged brand," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5316, The World Bank.
    16. Timothy Besley & Robin Burgess, 2003. "Halving Global Poverty," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 3-22, Summer.
    17. Bunte, Jonas B. & Desai, Harsh & Gbala, Kanio & Parks, Bradley & Runfola, Daniel Miller, 2018. "Natural resource sector FDI, government policy, and economic growth: Quasi-experimental evidence from Liberia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 151-162.
    18. Yunker, James A., 2006. "Swords into plowshares: Financing a world economic equalization program," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 563-593, July.
    19. Jason Nassios & James A. Giesecke & Peter B. Dixon & Maureen T. Rimmer, 2016. "Superannuation and Macroeconomic Growth and Stability," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-267, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    20. Prévost, Benoît & Rivaud, Audrey, 2018. "The World Bank’s environmental strategies: Assessing the influence of a biased use of New Institutional Economics on legal issues," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 370-380.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:414-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.