IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v11y2017i1p1046-1053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use Of Heuristics In Business Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Radu ATANASIU

Abstract

In today’s business environment, the game changes incredibly fast, new types of challenges arise more and more often, assessing unfamiliar context and making decisions under uncertainty becomes a daily routine for any manager. Therefore, heuristics (viewed as simple decision-making algorithms) can be a useful tool for many categories of business professionals. This paper provides a review of the different ways that the scientific community analyzes heuristics in business, focusing particularly on the conscious (rational) vs. unconscious (irrational) approach; it draws upon the analogy between heuristics, proverbs and memes (as defined by Richard Dawkins) in their capacity to replicate and adapt; it also discusses, based on a narrow scope research on Romanian business professionals, the limits of heuristics and also the favorable conditions under which heuristics can become decision rules shared throughout the organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Radu ATANASIU, 2017. "The Use Of Heuristics In Business Decisions," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 1046-1053, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:1046-1053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2017/pdf/5_19.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manimala, Mathew J., 1992. "Entrepreneurial heuristics: A comparison between high PL (pioneering-innovative) and low PI ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 7(6), pages 477-504, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. K. Das & Bing-Sheng Teng, 1998. "Time and Entrepreneurial Risk Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(2), pages 69-88, January.
    2. Jahangir Yadollahi Farsi & Pouria Nouri & Abdollah Ahmadi Kafeshani, 2015. "Exploring the Interconnections between Sense making, Heuristics and Biases in the Field of Entrepreneurship," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 121-128.
    3. Simone Guercini, 2019. "Heuristics as tales from the field: the problem of scope," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 18(2), pages 191-205, December.
    4. Kambiz Talebi & Pouria Nouri & Abdolah Ahmadi Kafeshani, 2014. "Identifying the main Individual Factors Influencing Entrepreneurial Decision making Biases: A Qualitative Content Analysis Approach," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(8), pages 1-11, August.
    5. Mark Simon & Susan M. Houghton, 2002. "The Relationship among Biases, Misperceptions, and the Introduction of Pioneering Products: Examining Differences in Venture Decision Contexts," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 27(2), pages 105-124, April.
    6. Burmeister, Katrin & Schade, Christian, 2007. "Are entrepreneurs' decisions more biased? An experimental investigation of the susceptibility to status quo bias," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 340-362, May.
    7. Radu Atanasiu & Riku Ruotsalainen & Svetlana N. Khapova, 2023. "A Simple Rule is Born: How CEOs Distill Heuristics," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1064-1104, July.
    8. Simon, Mark & Shrader, Rodney C., 2012. "Entrepreneurial actions and optimistic overconfidence: The role of motivated reasoning in new product introductions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 291-309.
    9. Stephen X. Zhang & Javier Cueto, 2017. "The Study of Bias in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(3), pages 419-454, May.
    10. Benson, David F. & Brau, James C. & Cicon, James & Ferris, Stephen P., 2015. "Strategically camouflaged corporate governance in IPOs: Entrepreneurial masking and impression management," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 839-864.
    11. Andrea MAKINGS & Brian BARNARD, 2019. "The Heuristics of Entrepreneurs," Expert Journal of Business and Management, Sprint Investify, vol. 7(2), pages 179-203.
    12. Paul Westhead & Deniz Ucbasaran & Mike Wright & Martin Binks, 2005. "Novice, Serial and Portfolio Entrepreneur Behaviour and Contributions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 109-132, September.
    13. Lowell W. Busenitz & Chung-Ming Lau, 1996. "A Cross-Cultural Cognitive Model of New Venture Creation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 20(4), pages 25-40, July.
    14. Ucbasaran, Deniz & Westhead, Paul & Wright, Mike, 2009. "The extent and nature of opportunity identification by experienced entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 99-115, March.
    15. Guercini, Simone & Milanesi, Matilde, 2020. "Heuristics in international business: A systematic literature review and directions for future research," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(4).
    16. Rodney C. Shrader & Mark Simon & Steven Stanton, 2021. "Financial forecasting and risky decisions: an experimental study grounded in Prospect theory," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1827-1841, December.
    17. Loock, Moritz & Hinnen, Gieri, 2015. "Heuristics in organizations: A review and a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 2027-2036.
    18. J. Robert Mitchell & Paul N. Friga & Ronald K. Mitchell, 2005. "Untangling the Intuition Mess: Intuition as a Construct in Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(6), pages 653-679, November.
    19. Dubard Barbosa, Saulo & Fayolle, Alain & Smith, Brett R., 2019. "Biased and overconfident, unbiased but going for it: How framing and anchoring affect the decision to start a new venture," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 528-557.
    20. Ferriani, Simone & Lazerson, Mark H. & Lorenzoni, Gianni, 2020. "Anchor entrepreneurship and industry catalysis: The rise of the Italian Biomedical Valley," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:1046-1053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.