IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/bemann/v4y2014i3p5-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Making And Innovation Diagnosis Within Aero-Space Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian VIZITIU

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Vlad VALEANU

    (Space Applications for Human Health and Safety, Institute of Space Science –ISS, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Adrian TANTAU

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Ruxandra VIZITIU

    (College of Romanian Psychologists, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihaela MARIN

    (Space Applications for Human Health and Safety, Institute of Space Science –ISS, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Alexandru NISTORESCU

    (Space Applications for Human Health and Safety, Institute of Space Science –ISS, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The triggering cause of the present research is given by the high complexity of the interdisciplinary technical projects carried out by means of Systems Engineering (SE) methodology, and implicitly by the well acknowledged needs in the field for more advanced decision making tools to increase the projects efficiency and innovativeness. This study takes into consideration a novel theoretical decision making and knowledge creation diagnosis model for SE, entitled DiagnoSE, which is based on the Cognitive-Emotional and Explicit-Tacit knowledge dyads, for applying it within Romanian aero-space sector, implicitly upon 197 SE decision makers, for contributing to the Romanian SE management efficiency. Based on the principle that distinguishes the first dyad as a mechanism for accessing knowledge from the second dyad, and on numerically quantified pairwise comparisons, there was diagnosed the Romanian aero-space SE professionals’ perceptions on decisions making, and also knowledge creation dynamics within interdisciplinary teams. The quantitative research revealed notably results especially by the high weight of Emotional Criterion with respect to Romanian SE experts’ preferences for accessing their own experiences, and furthermore, by the need for achieving innovations through continuous knowledge spirals. The herein study brings a practical and unique image upon the Romanian interdisciplinary working environment based on SE in the aero-space sector by applying DiagnoSE instrument in order to determine and analyze the decision making and knowledge creation aspects of paramount importance in enhancing the Romanian SE teams’ management, and even furthermore, in providing a basis for other researches regarding SE based working environments in aero-space sectors and not merely.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian VIZITIU & Vlad VALEANU & Adrian TANTAU & Ruxandra VIZITIU & Mihaela MARIN & Alexandru NISTORESCU, 2014. "Decision Making And Innovation Diagnosis Within Aero-Space Sector," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(3), pages 5-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:bemann:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:5-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://beman.ase.ro/no43/1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristian VIZITIU, 2014. "Conceptual Diagnosis Model Based on Distinct Knowledge Dyads for Interdisciplinary Environments," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 2(4), pages 71-86, April.
    2. Constantin Bratianu & Ivona ORZEA, 2009. "Emergence of the Cognitive-Emotional Knowledge Dyad," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(5), pages 893-901, December.
    3. Adrian Dumitru Tantau & Cristian Vizitiu & Vlad Valeanu, 2014. "The Responsibility of Telemedicine Focused Organizations in regards to creating Compliant end Users Products and Services," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(35), pages 108-108, February.
    4. Benn Lawson & Danny Samson, 2001. "Developing Innovation Capability In Organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 377-400.
    5. Branzei, Oana & Vertinsky, Ilan, 2006. "Strategic pathways to product innovation capabilities in SMEs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 75-105, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruxandra DINULESCU & Laura Violeta VOICU, 2014. "Quality Management In Romania’S Private And State Hospitals," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(3), pages 45-53, September.
    2. Hope Oyemami OLUMAMI & Thomas Kolawole OJO & Dickson Okoree MIREKU, 2014. "Perceiving Risk Of Automobile Drivers On Mobile Phone Usage While Driving In Ibadan Metropolis, Nigeria," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(3), pages 24-35, September.
    3. Gabriel MIREA, 2014. "Considerations On The Pricing Strategy For The Product Line," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(3), pages 36-44, September.
    4. Cristian VIZITIU, 2014. "Conceptual Diagnosis Model Based on Distinct Knowledge Dyads for Interdisciplinary Environments," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 2(4), pages 71-86, April.
    5. Guido Bortoluzzi & Saif Maqbool, 2016. "Le dodici fonti della capacit? innovativa tra letteratura accademica e pratica manageriale," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(3), pages 48-67.
    6. Eriksson, Taina, 2014. "Processes, antecedents and outcomes of dynamic capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 65-82.
    7. Naveed Mushtaq & Wong Wai Peng, 2020. "Can TQM Act as Stimulus to Elevate Firms’ Innovation Performance?: An Empirical Evidence From the Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    8. Wenqian Zhou & Vivek K. Velamuri & Tobias Dauth, 2017. "Changing Innovation Roles Of Foreign Subsidiaries From The Manufacturing Industry In China," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-32, January.
    9. Ayamga, Matthew & Annosi, Maria Carmela & Kassahun, Ayalew & Dolfsma, Wilfred & Tekinerdogan, Bedir, 2024. "Adaptive organizational responses to varied types of failures: Empirical insights from technology providers in Ghana," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Simona Alfiero & Laura Broccardo & Massimo Cane & Alfredo Esposito, 2018. "High Performance Through Innovation Process Management in SMEs. Evidence from the Italian wine sector," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 87-110.
    11. Sikandar Ali Qalati & Dragana Ostic & Gu Shuibin & Fan Mingyue, 2022. "A mediated–moderated model for social media adoption and small and medium‐sized enterprise performance in emerging countries," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 846-861, April.
    12. Daniele Schiliro, 2015. "Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises in the United Arab Emirates," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 3(5), pages 148-160, September.
    13. Wang, Yonggui & Hong, Aoran & Li, Xia & Gao, Jia, 2020. "Marketing innovations during a global crisis: A study of China firms’ response to COVID-19," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 214-220.
    14. Zhang-Zhang, YingYing & Rohlfer, Sylvia & Varma, Arup, 2022. "Strategic people management in contemporary highly dynamic VUCA contexts: A knowledge worker perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 587-598.
    15. Agata Sudolska & Justyna Łapińska, 2020. "Exploring Determinants of Innovation Capability in Manufacturing Companies Operating in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Sylvia Novillo-Villegas & Ricardo Ayala-Andrade & Juan Pablo Lopez-Cox & Javier Salazar-Oyaneder & Patricia Acosta-Vargas, 2022. "A Roadmap for Innovation Capacity in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Markku Sotarauta, 2003. "Dynamic Capacities in Promotion of Economic Development of City-regions," ERSA conference papers ersa03p427, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Kong YuSheng & Masud Ibrahim, 2020. "Innovation Capabilities, Innovation Types, and Firm Performance: Evidence From the Banking Sector of Ghana," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    19. Arunachalam, S. & Ramaswami, Sridhar N. & Patel, Pankaj C. & Chai, Linlin, 2022. "Innovation-based strategic flexibility (ISF): Role of CEO ties with marketing and R&D," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 927-946.
    20. Nham Tuan Phong & Nguyen Tuyet-Mai & Tran Nam Hoai & Nguyen Hao Anh, 2020. "Knowledge sharing and innovation capability at both individual and organizational levels: An empirical study from Vietnam’s telecommunication companies," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 275-301, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Decision making; Knowledge creation; Systems Engineering (SE); DiagnoSE; Cognitive-Emotional; Explicit-Tacit; Knowledge; Dyad;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A1 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics
    • A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics
    • B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:bemann:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:5-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zamfir Andreea (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.