IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecosci/es1904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodology of regional analysis of the Russian economic reseaerch market
[Методология Регионального Анализа Российского Рынка Экономических Исследований]

Author

Listed:
  • Moskovkin, V.M. (Московкин, В.М.)

    (Belgorod State National Research University)

  • sun, X. (Сунь, С.)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

After the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the transition to a market economy model in Russia, there has been observed a rapid growth for market economic studies challenge in ranking of its three segments, such as the economists market, scientific economic journals market, research training of economists market. The purpose of the study is to aggregate quantitative indicators of economic market segments for economic studies in the Russian regions. The initial data calculations are done on quantitative indicators from the TOP-500 gold ranking of economist E. V. Balatsky for 2016, the list of “vakovsky” economic journals from 07.06.2017 and the ranking of 2016 economic dissertation councils across the Russian regions. The aggregation of the above indicators is done according to the arithmetic average formula for their normalized values. A cross-correlation matrix has been constructed for the above indicators and an integral indicator with all linear paired regression equations in which the values of the coefficient of determination R2 varied in the range from 0,93 to 0.99. A practically analytical multiple regression equation (R2 = 1.0) has been obtained between the values of the above three indicators of the market for economic studies and an integral indicator on the other hand. In the article, it is also shown that the effect of the number of economic councils on the integral indicator is three times greater than the effect of the number of economists and the number of economic councils each separately. The best convergence to the Pareto distribution has been shown by the distribution of the values of the integral indicator of the state of the regional economic research market. On the basis of an integral indicator, the clusterization of regional markets for economic studies in Russia has been done using the method of natural borders.

Suggested Citation

  • Moskovkin, V.M. (Московкин, В.М.) & sun, X. (Сунь, С.), 2019. "Methodology of regional analysis of the Russian economic reseaerch market [Методология Регионального Анализа Российского Рынка Экономических Исследований]," Economy of science, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 5, pages 67-78, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecosci:es1904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecosci/es1904.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rubinstein, A., 2016. "Ranking of Russian Economic Journals: The Scientific Method or "Numbers Game"," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 162-175.
    2. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 2016. "New Economics Journals," Journal of Economics Bibliography, KSP Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 157-171, March.
    3. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 2016. "New Economics Journals," Journal of Economics Bibliography, KSP Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 521-529, September.
    4. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 2016. "New Economics Journals," Journal of Economics Bibliography, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 370-379, June.
    5. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 2016. "New Economics Journals," Journal of Economics Bibliography, KSP Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 646-657, December.
    6. Balatsky, Evgeny V. (Балацкий, Евгений) & Ekimova, Natalia A. (Екимова, Наталья), 2017. "Competition of Economic Journals in Russia: Results of the Three Waves of Ranking [Конкуренция Экономических Журналов России: Итоги Трех Волн Рейтингования]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 178-201, December.
    7. Subochev, A., 2016. "How Different Are the Existing Ratings of Russian Economic Journals and How to Unify Them?," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 181-192.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. M. Moskovkin & X. Sun, 2019. "Methodology of regional analysis of the Russian economic reseaerch market," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 5(1).
    2. Mariarosaria Comunale & Anh Dinh Minh Nguyen & Soroosh Soofi-Siavash, 2019. "Convergence and growth decomposition: an analysis on Lithuania," Bank of Lithuania Discussion Paper Series 17, Bank of Lithuania.
    3. Olavarrieta, Sergio, 2016. "Utilizando avaliações de especialistas para classificar 45 publicações latinoamericanas de negócios," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 56(3), May.
    4. Johan Lyhagen & Per Ahlgren, 2020. "Uncertainty and the ranking of economics journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2545-2560, December.
    5. Evgeniya Baturina & Alexander Litvinenko, 2018. "Monitoring of Shadow Cash Flows Using Computer Modelling," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 326-338.
    6. Thomas Palley, 2022. "More on the limits of New Developmentalism," Working Papers PKWP2213, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    7. Jankovic Ivan & Block Walter, 2019. "Private Property Rights, Government Interventionism and Welfare Economics," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 19(4), pages 365-397, December.
    8. Kombui, Diana & Kotey, Richard Angelous, 2019. "Foreign Direct Investment in an Emerging Economy: Exploring the Determinants and Causal Linkages," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 51-62.
    9. Young Back Choi & Yong J. Yoon, 2016. "Liberalism in Korea," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 13(1), pages 100–128-1, January.
    10. Hänke, Hendrik & Barkmann, Jan & Blum, Lloyd & Franke, Yvonne & Martin, Dominic A. & Niens, Jasnna & Osen, Kristina & Uruena, Viviana & Witherspoon, S. Annette & Wurz, Annemarie, 2018. "Socio-economic, land use and value chain perspectives on vanilla farming in the SAVA Region (north-eastern Madagascar): The Diversity Turn Baseline Study (DTBS)," DARE Discussion Papers 1806, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    11. Salvador Madrigal Moreno & Gerardo Gabriel Alfaro Calder¨®n & Flor Madrigal Moreno, 2016. "Social Media Marketing Perspectives in the Organization in Morelia, Mexico," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(2), pages 128-137, April.
    12. Valentin Jouvanceau, 2023. "Consumer price rigidity in periods of low and high inflation: the case of Lithuania," Bank of Lithuania Discussion Paper Series 34, Bank of Lithuania.
    13. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 2016. "New Economics Journals," Journal of Economics Bibliography, KSP Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 157-171, March.
    14. De Witte, Kristof & Schiltz, Fritz, 2018. "Measuring and explaining organizational effectiveness of school districts: Evidence from a robust and conditional Benefit-of-the-Doubt approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1172-1181.
    15. Pinchetti, Marco, 2020. "What Is Driving The TFP Slowdown? Insights From a Schumpeterian DSGE Model," MPRA Paper 98316, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Chen, Kun & Ren, Xian-tong & Yang, Guo-liang, 2021. "A novel approach for assessing academic journals: Application of integer DEA model for management science and operations research field," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    17. Agostino, Mariarosaria & Nifo, Annamaria & Trivieri, Francesco & Vecchione, Gaetano, 2016. "Total factor productivity heterogeneity: channelling the impact of institutions," MPRA Paper 72759, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Rubinstein, A., 2019. "Man shall not live by RSCI alone..," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 44(4), pages 245-259.
    19. Jennifer Kunz & Mathias Heitz, 2021. "Banks’ risk culture and management control systems: A systematic literature review," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 439-493, December.
    20. Rosenthal, Edward C. & Weiss, Howard J., 2017. "A data envelopment analysis approach for ranking journals," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 135-147.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic research market; economists market; scientific economic journals market; research training of economists market; regional analysis; correlation and regression analysis; Pareto distribution; natural borders method;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • A29 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecosci:es1904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.