IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/s2117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Northern Caucasus: Choosing Strategic Landmarks
[Северный Кавказ: Выбор Стратегических Ориентиров]

Author

Listed:
  • Irina Starodubovskaya

    (The Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Konstantin Kazenin

    (The Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Daniil Sitckevich

    (The Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of conceptual issues related to the development strategy of the North Caucasus region. These issues are pressing again because of the failure of the North Caucasus Strategy, confirmed by the audit of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation. The analysis shows that the roots of the identified problems are related not to the wrong choice or configuration of the instruments stimulating accelerated growth in the region but to the inadequate character of the whole model of “modernization from above” as it is referred to in the article. This model is oriented to the implementation of large investment projects supported by the state and financed by investments outside the region. Despite attempts at “modernization from above” being ineffective not only in the North Caucasus region, but in other developing areas as well, and the modernization itself having significant downsides, the strategy is still perceived by many as a plausible policy toward stimulating economic development. The “grassroots modernization” model, based on internal rather than external resources of the region, is considered as an alternative. The state in this model facilitates the improvement of the investment climate and removal of the barriers to local businesses’ development as well as creation of an “enabling environment” in which local economy can grow and flourish. The issues of shadow economy legalization, stimulation of cooperation and formation of development infrastructure are discussed using the approaches of “grassroots modernization.” Relevant examples of international experience are used in the analysis, including the best and the worst practices of support for accelerated growth in Southern Italy as well as the experience of shadow economy legalization in several countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina Starodubovskaya & Konstantin Kazenin & Daniil Sitckevich, 2021. "Northern Caucasus: Choosing Strategic Landmarks [Северный Кавказ: Выбор Стратегических Ориентиров]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 3, pages 112-137, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:s2117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/s2117.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin Yifu Lin, 2011. "New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 26(2), pages 193-221, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniil A. Sitkevich, 2022. "Shadow economy: To legalise or to tolerate?," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 6-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Polterovich, Victor, 2013. "Реформа Ран: Экспертный Анализ: Часть I. Реформа Ран: Проект Минобрнауки [Reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences: An Expert Analysis: Part I. Reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences: a project," MPRA Paper 49291, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    3. Harrison, Ann E. & Lin, Justin Yifu & Xu, Lixin Colin, 2014. "Explaining Africa’s (Dis)advantage," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 59-77.
    4. Rhys Andrews & Malcolm J. Beynon, 2019. "Configurational Analysis of Access to Basic Infrastructure Services: Evidence from Turkish Provinces," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(5), pages 1341-1370, December.
    5. Paul - Bogdan Zamfir, 2015. "The Stimulation Of Inovation In The Romanian Enterprises On The Coordinates Of Sustainable Development," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 86-89, June.
    6. Suwan Lu & Guobin Fang & Mingtao Zhao, 2023. "Towards Inclusive Growth: Perspective of Regional Spatial Correlation Network in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Chen, Zhao & Poncet, Sandra & Xiong, Ruixiang, 2017. "Inter-industry relatedness and industrial-policy efficiency: Evidence from China’s export processing zones," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 809-826.
    8. Li, Aitong & Xu, Yuan & Shiroyama, Hideaki, 2019. "Solar lobby and energy transition in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Tim Kelsall, 2012. "Neo-Patrimonialism, Rent-Seeking and Development: Going with the Grain?," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 677-682, November.
    10. -, 2012. "Mudança estrutural para a igualdade: Uma visão integrada do desenvolvimento. Trigésimo quarto período de sessões da CEPAL. Síntese," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 13948 edited by Cepal, May.
    11. Pi, Jiancai & Zhang, Pengqing, 2018. "Skill-biased technological change and wage inequality in developing countries," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 347-362.
    12. Valeriy V. Mironov & Liudmila D. Konovalova, 2019. "Structural changes and economic growth in the world economy and Russia," Russian Journal of Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, April.
    13. Peter Mayerhofer, 2013. "Wiens Industrie in der wissensbasierten Stadtwirtschaft. Wandlungsprozesse, Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, industriepolitische Ansatzpunkte," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 57934.
    14. de Vries, Gaaitzen J. & Erumban, Abdul A. & Timmer, Marcel P. & Voskoboynikov, Ilya & Wu, Harry X., 2012. "Deconstructing the BRICs: Structural transformation and aggregate productivity growth," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 211-227.
    15. -, 2012. "Changement structurel pour l'égalité: Une vision intégrée du développement. Trente-quatrième session de la CEPALC. Synthèse," Documentos de posición del período de sesiones de la Comisión 13950, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    16. Justin Yifu Lin, 2013. "Demystifying the Chinese Economy," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 46(3), pages 259-268, September.
    17. Sèna Kimm Gnangnon, 2020. "Comparative Advantage Following (CAF) development strategy, Aid for Trade flows and structural change in production," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-29, December.
    18. Dongwu Wu & Linlin Wu & Yongbo Ye, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Industrial structure optimization, economic development factors and regional economic risk prevention in post COVID-19 period: empirical analysis based on panel data of Guangdong re," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 3735-3777, December.
    19. Pi, Jiancai & Zhang, Pengqing, 2021. "Redistribution and wage inequality," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-523.
    20. Tingting Li & Hongwei Lu & Qiyou Luo & Guojing Li & Mingjie Gao, 2024. "The Impact of Rural Population Aging on Agricultural Cropping Structure: Evidence from China’s Provinces," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:s2117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.