IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep1828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Regional Development with the Network Theory Approach
[Использование Теории Сетей При Составлении Рейтингов Развития Региональных Экономик]

Author

Listed:
  • Lyubimov, Ivan L. (Любимов, Иван)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Gvozdeva, Margarita V. (Гвоздева, Маргарита)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Lysyuk, Maria A. (Лысюк, Мария)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

In this paper, we make a detailed description of a network method which we then use to calculate a new ranking that measures the export complexity of Russian regions. Even though this ranking directly measures the complexity of regional export baskets, indirectly it also reflects other features of regional economies, as the ability to supply goods to international markets results from the availability of different capabilities in a particular region, such as know-how, equipment, infrastructure etc. At the same time, the calculation of the ranking does not require a lot of various data, as well as constructing numerous variables characterizing different aspects of regional development. The method which is discussed in this paper has several important advantages over a number of alternative regional rankings. In particular, the latter employ the assumption of substitutability among various factors that are taken into account when these rankings are calculated. However, this assumption is often too strong. Moreover, these rankings are not based on any well-defined theoretical structure, and the choice of variables which are used to calculate these rankings is not explicitly explained. In contrast, the method which is discussed in this paper has a well-defined theoretical structure and uses no strong assumptions. At the same time, the resulting ranking is strongly correlated with other regional rankings, which indicates that the former also contains a significant share of information present in the latter, which emphasizes again the ability of the new ranking to capture different important features of regional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Lyubimov, Ivan L. (Любимов, Иван) & Gvozdeva, Margarita V. (Гвоздева, Маргарита) & Lysyuk, Maria A. (Лысюк, Мария), 2018. "Measuring Regional Development with the Network Theory Approach [Использование Теории Сетей При Составлении Рейтингов Развития Региональных Экономик]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 3, pages 206-233, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1828.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cesar A. Hidalgo & Ricardo Hausmann, 2009. "The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity," Papers 0909.3890, arXiv.org.
    2. Sebastián Bustos & Charles Gomez & Ricardo Hausmann & César A Hidalgo, 2012. "The Dynamics of Nestedness Predicts the Evolution of Industrial Ecosystems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-8, November.
    3. Ricardo Hausmann & Jason Hwang & Dani Rodrik, 2007. "What you export matters," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Michele Coscia & Ricardo Hausmann & Frank Neffke, 2016. "Exploring the Uncharted Export: An Analysis of Tourism-Related Foreign Expenditure with International Spend Data," Growth Lab Working Papers 88, Harvard's Growth Lab.
    5. C. A. Hidalgo & B. Klinger & A. -L. Barabasi & R. Hausmann, 2007. "The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations," Papers 0708.2090, arXiv.org.
    6. Abhijit Banerjee & Arun G Chandrasekhar & Esther Duflo & Mathew O. Jackson, 2014. "Gossip: Identifying Central Individuals in a Social Network," Working Papers id:5925, eSocialSciences.
    7. Kemp-Benedict, Eric, 2014. "An interpretation and critique of the Method of Reflections," MPRA Paper 60705, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Hausmann, Ricardo & Klinger, Bailey, 2006. "Structural Transformation and Patterns of Comparative Advantage in the Product Space," Working Paper Series rwp06-041, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    9. Hausmann, Ricardo & Hidalgo, Cesar A. & Stock, Daniel P. & Yildirim, Muhammed A., 2014. "Implied Comparative Advantage," Working Paper Series rwp14-003, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    10. Jian Gao & Tao Zhou, 2017. "Quantifying China's Regional Economic Complexity," Papers 1703.01292, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2017.
    11. Marcel P. Timmer & Abdul Azeez Erumban & Bart Los & Robert Stehrer & Gaaitzen J. de Vries, 2014. "Slicing Up Global Value Chains," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(2), pages 99-118, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shubin, I., 2021. "Correlation between economic complexity and economic development in different types of Russian regions," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 144-161.
    2. Lyubimov, Ivan L. (Любимов, Иван) & Kazakova, Maria V. (Казакова, Мария) & Gvozdeva, Margarita (Гвоздева, Маргарита) & Ospanova, Aigerim G. (Оспанова, Айгерим), 2019. "The Failure and Triumph of Economic Complexity: Economic History of Argentina and South Korea in the Second Half of the 20th Century [Провал И Триумф Экономического Усложнения: История Аргентины И ," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 5, pages 8-35, October.
    3. Lyubimov, I. & Iakubovskii, I., 2020. "How to make economic complexity index more complex: Taking export geography into account," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 47(3), pages 12-39.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lyubimov, I. & Iakubovskii, I., 2020. "How to make economic complexity index more complex: Taking export geography into account," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 47(3), pages 12-39.
    2. Lyubimov, Ivan & Gvozdeva, Margarita & Lysyuk, Maria, 2018. "Towards increased complexity in Russian regions : networks, diversification and growth," BOFIT Discussion Papers 8/2018, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    3. Hartmann, Dominik & Guevara, Miguel R. & Jara-Figueroa, Cristian & Aristarán, Manuel & Hidalgo, César A., 2017. "Linking Economic Complexity, Institutions, and Income Inequality," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 75-93.
    4. Ulrich Schetter & Dario Diodato & Eric S. M. Protzer & Frank Neffke & Ricardo Hausmann, 2024. "From Products to Capabilities: Constructing A Genotypic Product Space," Growth Lab Working Papers 230, Harvard's Growth Lab.
    5. Antonios Garas & Sophie Guthmuller & Athanasios Lapatinas, 2021. "The development of nations conditions the disease space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-35, January.
    6. repec:zbw:bofitp:2018_008 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Angelica Sbardella & Andrea Zaccaria & Luciano Pietronero & Pasquale Scaramozzino, 2021. "Behind the Italian Regional Divide: An Economic Fitness and Complexity Perspective," LEM Papers Series 2021/30, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    8. Hausmann, Ricardo & Stock, Daniel P. & Yıldırım, Muhammed A., 2022. "Implied comparative advantage," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(8).
    9. Olimpia Neagu, 2019. "The Link between Economic Complexity and Carbon Emissions in the European Union Countries: A Model Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    10. Dosi, Giovanni & Roventini, Andrea & Russo, Emanuele, 2019. "Endogenous growth and global divergence in a multi-country agent-based model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 101-129.
    11. Antonis Adam & Antonios Garas & Marina-Selini Katsaiti & Athanasios Lapatinas, 2023. "Economic complexity and jobs: an empirical analysis," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 25-52, January.
    12. Sèna Kimm Gnangnon, 2023. "Do unilateral trade preferences help reduce poverty in beneficiary countries?," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 249-288, February.
    13. Ferrarini, Benno & Scaramozzino, Pasquale, 2013. "Complexity, Specialization, and Growth," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 344, Asian Development Bank.
    14. Hidalgo, César A., 2023. "The policy implications of economic complexity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
    15. Ricardo Hausmann & Jose Ramon Morales Arilla & Miguel Angel Santos, 2016. "Panama beyond the Canal: Using Technological Proximities to Identify Opportunities for Productive Diversification," Growth Lab Working Papers 84, Harvard's Growth Lab.
    16. Lyubimov, Ivan & Gvozdeva, Margarita & Lysyuk, Maria, 2018. "Towards increased complexity in Russian regions: networks, diversification and growth," BOFIT Discussion Papers 8/2018, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    17. Bustos, Sebastián & Yıldırım, Muhammed A., 2022. "Production Ability and economic growth," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(8).
    18. Hausmann, Ricardo & Morales, Jose Ramon & Santos, Miguel Angel, 2016. "Economic Complexity in Panama: Assessing Opportunities for Productive Diversification," Working Paper Series rwp16-046, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    19. Canh Phuc Nguyen & Thanh Dinh Su, 2021. "Financing the economy: The multidimensional influences of financial development on economic complexity," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 644-684, May.
    20. Nguyen, Canh Phuc, 2021. "Gender equality and economic complexity," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 45(4).
    21. Sandra Edith Medellín Mendoza & Miguel Alejandro Flores Segovia & Amado Villarreal González, 2017. "Análisis regional de sofisticación y centralidad de las exportaciones mexicanas. (Regional Analysis of Sophistication and Centrality of Mexican Exports)," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(2), pages 147-184, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regional development; export complexity; network theory; centrality.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.