IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep1809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Private Business and Revolution (on the Economic Reasons of the Events of February 1917 in Russia)
[Частный Бизнес И Революция (К Вопросу Об Экономических Причинах Февраля 1917 Года В России)]

Author

Listed:
  • Bessolitsyn, Alexander A. (Бессолицын, Александр)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, The Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IRH RAS))

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the results of work of private joint-stock companies during the industry restructuring during the First World War and the influence of this process on the economic condition of Russia on the eve of the February revolution of 1917. At the turn of the 20th century, joint-stock companies succeed among other forms of business set-up, mostly because of their organizational, legal and economic features. The process of industrialization in Russia increased the importance of these companies, which were capable of making large investments in such capital-intensive branches as banking, extraction of new types of natural resources (coal mining, oil extraction etc.), and creation of innovative industries. An overview of the condition of joint-stock companies during the First World War and on the eve of the February revolution is presented by the issue “Joint-Stock Companies in Russia According to the Official Data of the Ministry of Trade and Industry and the Ministry of Finance”. It was the only reference book in Russia which contained systematized data about the joint-stock companies active in Russia. The reference book was printed annually as of 1912; the latest issue is dated 1917. As a result of the analysis, the author makes a conclusion that in spite of the difficulties associated with the transfer of the county’s economy to war regime, generally, the work of joint-stock companies was successful up to February 1917 inclusive; at that it is applicable not only to those firms which received military orders from the state, but also those which worked on a free market. The evidence of this is the growth of the main capital and payment of per cent on dividends, which, starting from 1915, demonstrated a stable tendency for growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Bessolitsyn, Alexander A. (Бессолицын, Александр), 2018. "Private Business and Revolution (on the Economic Reasons of the Events of February 1917 in Russia) [Частный Бизнес И Революция (К Вопросу Об Экономических Причинах Февраля 1917 Года В России)]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 234-251, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1809.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markevich, Andrei & Harrison, Mark, 2011. "Great War, Civil War, and Recovery: Russia's National Income, 1913 to 1928," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(3), pages 672-703, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miller, Marcus & Smith, Jennifer C., 2015. "In the shadow of the Gulag: Worker discipline under Stalin," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 531-548.
    2. Anton Cheremukhin & Mikhail Golosov & Sergei Guriev & Aleh Tsyvinski, 2013. "Was Stalin Necessary for Russia's Economic Development?," NBER Working Papers 19425, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Paul Castañeda Dower & Andrei Markevich, 2018. "Labor Misallocation and Mass Mobilization: Russian Agriculture during the Great War," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 100(2), pages 245-259, May.
    4. repec:cge:wacage:2018 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Andrei Markevich & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2018. "The Economic Effects of the Abolition of Serfdom: Evidence from the Russian Empire," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(4-5), pages 1074-1117, April.
    6. Leandro Prados de la Escosura, 2015. "World Human Development: 1870–2007," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 61(2), pages 220-247, June.
    7. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/382e4c7la19qb8m0mtvar753ei is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Jutta Bolt & Jan Luiten Zanden, 2014. "The Maddison Project: collaborative research on historical national accounts," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 67(3), pages 627-651, August.
    9. Broadberry, Stephen & Korchmina, Elena, 2022. "Catching-up and falling behind : Russian economic growth,1690s-1880s," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 626, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    10. Sabine Eckhardt & Ignacio Pisso & Nikolaos Evangeliou & Christine Groot Zwaaftink & Andreas Plach & Joseph R. McConnell & Michael Sigl & Meri Ruppel & Christian Zdanowicz & Saehee Lim & Nathan Chellma, 2023. "Revised historical Northern Hemisphere black carbon emissions based on inverse modeling of ice core records," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    11. Prados de la Escosura, Leandro, 2019. "Human Development in the Age of Globalisation," CEPR Discussion Papers 13744, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Harrison, Mark, 2017. "The Soviet Economy, 1917-1991 : Its Life and Afterlife," Economic Research Papers 269309, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    13. Lindert, Peter H. & Nafziger, Steven, 2014. "Russian Inequality on the Eve of Revolution," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 74(3), pages 767-798, September.
    14. repec:cte:whrepe:wp13-01 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Chernina, Eugenia & Castañeda Dower, Paul & Markevich, Andrei, 2014. "Property rights, land liquidity, and internal migration," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 191-215.
    16. Paul Castaneda Dower & Andrei Markevich, 2013. "Labor Surplus and Mass Mobilization: Russian Agriculture during the Great War," Working Papers w0196, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    17. Michel Fouquin & Jules Hugot, 2016. "Two Centuries of Bilateral Trade and Gravity Data: 1827-2014," Working Papers 2016-14, CEPII research center.
    18. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/382e4c7la19qb8m0mtvar753ei is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Smirnov, Sergey, 2015. "Economic Fluctuations in Russia (from the late 1920s to 2015)," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 130-153.
    20. Dubrovskaya, Yu. & Belonogov, Yu. & Kozonogova, E., 2023. "Evaluation of the effectiveness of administrative-territorial transformations in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 58(1), pages 89-108.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Joint-stock companies; First World War; military orders; dividend; main capital; military-industrial committees.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • N4 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation
    • N5 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries
    • N6 - Economic History - - Manufacturing and Construction
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.