IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep1468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral Antitrust
[Поведенческий Антитраст]

Author

Listed:
  • Shastitko, Anastasia (Шаститко, Анастасия)

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University)

Abstract

Purpose - to identify the grounds for the application of behavioral economics to antitrust policy. The analysis of the potential and limitations of behavioral economics for the purposes of anti-monopoly regulation. The main conclusion: the crisis of existing theories, which are based on competition policy, the emergence of new types of markets and new ways of restriction of competition and the development of alternative theories themselves forced to look for new ways to improve antitrust policy. One such way - using principles of behavioral economics, if not as the main theory, determines the direction of changes in antitrust laws and the mechanisms of its application, that as one of the key supporting theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Shastitko, Anastasia (Шаститко, Анастасия), 2014. "Behavioral Antitrust [Поведенческий Антитраст]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 76-91, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1468.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Salinger & Pauline Ippolito & Joel Schrag, 2007. "Economics at the FTC: Pharmaceutical Patent Dispute Settlements and Behavioral Economics," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 31(2), pages 85-105, September.
    2. Maurice E. Stucke, 2012. "Behavioral Antitrust And Monopolization," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 545-574.
    3. Michael Salinger, 2010. "Behavioral Economics, Consumer Protection, and Antitrust," CPI Journal, Competition Policy International, vol. 6.
    4. Mark Armstrong & Steffen Huck, 2011. "Behavioral Economics as Applied to Firms: A Primer," Antitrust Chronicle, Competition Policy International, vol. 1.
    5. Gregory J. Werden & Luke M. Froeb & Mikhael Shor, 2011. "Behavioral Antitrust and Merger Control," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 167(1), pages 126-142, March.
    6. Авдашева С. Б. & Шаститко А. Е., 2010. "Конкурентна Я Политика : Состав, Структура, Система 1," Современная конкуренция, CyberLeninka;Общество с ограниченной ответственностью «Синергия ПРЕСС», issue 1, pages 5-20.
    7. Maurice Stucke, 2011. "Crony Capitalism and Antitrust," Antitrust Chronicle, Competition Policy International, vol. 10.
    8. James Cooper & William Kovacic, 2012. "Behavioral economics: implications for regulatory behavior," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 41-58, February.
    9. James Cooper & William Kovacic, 2012. "Erratum to: Behavioral economics: implications for regulatory behavior," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 292-292, April.
    10. Maurice Stucke, 2009. "New Antitrust Realism," Antitrust Chronicle, Competition Policy International, vol. 1.
    11. Richard Schmalensee, 2012. "“On a Level with Dentists?” Reflections on the Evolution of Industrial Organization," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 41(3), pages 157-179, November.
    12. Christoph Engel & Axel Ockenfels, 2013. "Maverick – Making Sense of a Conjecture of Antitrust Policy in the Lab," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2013_14, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, revised Jan 2014.
    13. Douglas Ginsburg & Derek Moore, 2010. "The Future of Behavioral Economics in Antitrust Jurisprudence," CPI Journal, Competition Policy International, vol. 6.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrzej Baniak & Peter Grajzl, 2014. "Controlling Product Risks when Consumers are Heterogeneously Overconfident: Producer Liability vs. Minimum Quality Standard Regulation," CESifo Working Paper Series 5003, CESifo.
    2. Francesc Trillas Jané, 2016. "Behavioral Regulatory Agencies," Working Papers wpdea1606, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    3. Piotr Szkudlarek, 2021. "Choice Preferences in the Process of Making Regulatory Decisions under Risk and Uncertainty Conditions: An Experimental Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2 - Part ), pages 1127-1141.
    4. Schnellenbach, Jan & Schubert, Christian, 2015. "Behavioral political economy: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 395-417.
    5. Luis E. Mejía, 2021. "Judicial review of regulatory decisions: Decoding the contents of appeals against agencies in Spain and the United Kingdom," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 760-784, July.
    6. Michael Collins, J. & Urban, Carly, 2014. "The dark side of sunshine: Regulatory oversight and status quo bias," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 107(PB), pages 470-486.
    7. Trillas, Francesc, 2013. "The Institutional Architecture of Regulation and Competition: Spains's 2012 Reform," IESE Research Papers D/1067, IESE Business School.
    8. Kuehnhanss, Colin R. & Heyndels, Bruno & Hilken, Katharina, 2015. "Choice in politics: Equivalency framing in economic policy decisions and the influence of expertise," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 360-374.
    9. Budzinski, Oliver & Haucap, Justus, 2019. "Kartellrecht und Ökonomik: Institutions matter!," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 102, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    10. Saad Azmat & Hira Ghaffar, 2021. "Ethical Commitments and Credit Market Regulations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 421-433, July.
    11. Davide Pietroni & Sibylla Verdi Hughes, 2016. "Nudge to the future: capitalizing on illusory superiority bias to mitigate temporal discounting," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 15(2), pages 247-264, November.
    12. Susan E. Dudley & Zhoudan Xie, 2022. "Nudging the nudger: Toward a choice architecture for regulators," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 261-273, January.
    13. Sumit K. Majumdar & Rabih Moussawi & Ulku Yaylacicegi, 2019. "Mergers and Wages in Digital Networks: a Public Interest Perspective," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 583-615, December.
    14. Schnellenbach, Jan & Schubert, Christian, 2014. "Behavioral public choice: A survey," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 14/03, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    15. Sturm, Silke, 2019. "Political Competition: How to Measure Party Strategy in Direct Voter Communication using Social Media Data?," Hamburg Discussion Papers in International Economics 1, University of Hamburg, Department of Economics.
    16. Shastitko, Anastasia A. (Шаститко, Анастасия), 2017. "Interrelationship between Economic Theory and Competition Policy [Взаимное Влияние Экономической Теории И Конкурентной Политики]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 154-167, August.
    17. James Cooper & William Kovacic, 2012. "Behavioral economics: implications for regulatory behavior," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 41-58, February.
    18. Judith Clifton & Daniel Díaz-Fuentes & Marcos Fernández-Gutiérrez, 2014. "The impact of socio-economic background on satisfaction: evidence for policy-makers," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 183-206, October.
    19. Timothy Fitzgerald, 2024. "Regulatory capture in a resource boom," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 198(1), pages 93-127, January.
    20. Shastitko, Anastasia (Шаститко, Анастасия), 2018. "Application of the Conclusions of the Behavioral Economy to the Behavior of Civil Servants: Methodological Aspects [Применение Выводов Поведенческой Экономики К Поведению Государственных Служащих: ," Working Papers 031823, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.