IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/statec/0019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a system of key performance indicators to assess the investment attractiveness of the enterprise in the industry market

Author

Listed:
  • Grinchuk, Julia A.

    (Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI))

  • Abramova, Elena Yu.

    (Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI))

Abstract

In the context of limited own resources, enterprises need cash income from investors, which will serve as a necessary complement to their own funds. When making an investment decision, the investor pays considerable attention to the investment attractiveness of the enterprise. The investment attractiveness of the enterprise is greatly influenced by the industry market in which it operates, but the existing methods do not take into account these factors. That is why the relevance of research and practical development of the system of key performance indicators in assessing the investment attractiveness of an economic entity is increasing. To make the analysis of investment attractiveness more accurate, a model of key performance indicators was developed, which will take into account the impact of the industry market on the investment attractiveness of the enterprise in which it operates. The results of the study and the calculation of the developed system of key performance indicators proved that the indicators of the industry market can have a serious impact on the investment attractiveness of the enterprise and play a decisive role in making an investment decision.

Suggested Citation

  • Grinchuk, Julia A. & Abramova, Elena Yu., 2019. "Development of a system of key performance indicators to assess the investment attractiveness of the enterprise in the industry market," Economic Consultant, Roman I. Ostapenko, vol. 27(3), pages 5-11.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:statec:0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://gossovetnik.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/190301.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam A. Ambroziak & Christopher A. Hartwell, 2018. "The impact of investments in special economic zones on regional development: the case of Poland," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(10), pages 1322-1331, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kopczewska Katarzyna, 2019. "Can public intervention improve local public sector economic performance? The analysis of Special Economic Zones in Poland," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 6(53), pages 221-245, January.
    2. Rosa Canelli & Riccardo Realfonzo & Francesco Zezza, 2022. "An empirical Stock‐Flow Consistent regional model of Campania," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(1), pages 209-257, February.
    3. Susanne A. Frick & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2023. "What draws investment to special economic zones? Lessons from developing countries," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(11), pages 2136-2147, November.
    4. Susanne A. Frick & Imane Radouane, . "Special economic zones and entrepreneurship: A new path forward for SEZs in Africa?," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    5. Lizińska Wiesława, 2019. "Use of Investment Areas in Special Economic Zones in Poland in the Context of Planned Legislation Changes," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 27(1), pages 92-102, March.
    6. Zehong Wang & Shaojian Wang & Jieyu Wang & Yuqu Wang, 2022. "Development zones and urban economic performance in China: Direct impact and channel effects," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 1762-1782, December.
    7. Nebojša Stojčić & Korneliusz Pylak & Dubravka Jurlina Alibegović, 2022. "The spatial impact of entrepreneurial zones: firm, city and inter-city evidence," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(12), pages 2164-2176, December.
    8. O.A. Sinenko, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Factors of Functioning of Special Administrative Areas in the Asian-Pacific Region," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 20(3), pages 524-559.
    9. Ayesha KHAN & Hans-Dietrich HAASIS, 2020. "Spatially Induced Effects And Sustainability For Special Economic Zones: Implications For Zones In Pakistan Under China Pakistan Economic Corridor," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 179-194, June.
    10. Kuo‐Cheng Kuo & Wen‐Min Lu & Dinh Tam Nguyen & Hsiu Fei Wang, 2020. "The effect of special economic zones on governance performance and their spillover effects in Chinese provinces," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 446-460, April.
    11. Jaroslaw M. Nazarczuk & Marlena Cicha-Nazarczuk, 2021. "What are the Key Location Factors for Firms in Special Economic Zones? Evidence from Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 147-160.
    12. Nazarczuk, Jarosław M. & Umiński, Stanisław, 2019. "Foreign Trade in Special Economic Zones in Poland," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 204302, December.
    13. Jarosław M. Nazarczuk & Marlena Cicha-Nazarczuk, 2024. "Sustainable Employment Creation through the Polish Investment Zone in Lagging Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, June.
    14. Richard J. Hunter, Jr., 2018. "Poland¡¯s Sustained ¡°March to a Market Economy¡±: The Choice Between Competing Visions and Plans," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(1), pages 61-76, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Investment attractiveness; industry market; key performance indicators; gold mining; far Eastern Federal district; evaluation system; evaluation methods; industry; market;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R53 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Public Facility Location Analysis; Public Investment and Capital Stock

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:statec:0019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roman I. Ostapenko (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.