IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/spppps/0251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Projektowanie i implementacja polityki publicznej - przegląd podejść teoretycznych

Author

Listed:
  • Wolniewicz-Slomka, Klaudia

    (Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy, Wydział Pedagogiki)

Abstract

Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie podejść teoretycznych do procesów kształtowania polityki publicznej. Autorka skupia się na dwóch jej fazach - projektowaniu i implementacji, pomijając ewaluację. Tekst jest próbą odpowiedzi na następujące pytania badawcze: Jak badacze definiują politykę publiczną, jakie jej fazy wyróżniają? Czym te fazy się charakteryzują? Jak rozumiana jest implementacja i co oznaczają poszczególne podejścia do niej - odgórne, oddolne i hybrydowe? Co uznają za sukces implementacyjny i jakie czynniki wpływają na jego osiągnięcie? Jakie najpopularniejsze podejścia teoretyczne możemy odnaleźć w dorobku badaczy polityki publicznej? W którym kierunku powinny pójść przyszłe badania procesów polityki publicznej? Aby odpowiedzieć na powyższe pytania, autorka dokonała przeglądu literatury (głównie anglojęzycznej), w której podjęto zagadnienia projektowania i wdrażania polityk publicznych. Tekst jest syntezą podejść teoretycznych do polityki publicznej. Artykuł ma charakter przeglądowy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolniewicz-Slomka, Klaudia, 2022. "Projektowanie i implementacja polityki publicznej - przegląd podejść teoretycznych," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 9(3), pages 1-24, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/KSzPP/article/view/2751
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: azybal@sgh.waw.pl
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mihály Fazekas & Tracey Burns, 2012. "Exploring the Complex Interaction Between Governance and Knowledge in Education," OECD Education Working Papers 67, OECD Publishing.
    2. Robert T. Nakamura, 1987. "The Textbook Policy Process And Implementation Research," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 7(1), pages 142-154, September.
    3. Sabatier, Paul A., 1986. "Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 21-48, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sahide, Muhammad Alif K. & Fisher, Micah R. & Erbaugh, J.T. & Intarini, Dian & Dharmiasih, Wiwik & Makmur, Muliadi & Faturachmat, Fatwa & Verheijen, Bart & Maryudi, Ahmad, 2020. "The boom of social forestry policy and the bust of social forests in Indonesia: Developing and applying an access-exclusion framework to assess policy outcomes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Olivia Golden, 1990. "Innovation in public sector human services programs: The implications of innovation by “groping along”," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(2), pages 219-248.
    3. Natasja Reslow, 2015. "EU “Mobility” Partnerships: An Initial Assessment of Implementation Dynamics," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(2), pages 117-128.
    4. Lars Carlsson, 1996. "Nonhierarchical Implementation Analysis," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 8(4), pages 527-546, October.
    5. Ogada, Maurice Juma, 2012. "Forest Management Decentralization in Kenya: Effects on Household Farm Forestry Decisions in Kakamega," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126319, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Yi, Fangxin & Deng, Dong & Zhang, Yanjiang, 2020. "Collaboration of top-down and bottom-up approaches in the post-disaster housing reconstruction: Evaluating the cases in Yushu Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China from resilience perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Van de Graaf, Thijs, 2018. "Building or stumbling blocks? Assessing the performance of polycentric energy and climate governance networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 317-324.
    8. Landry Signé, 2017. "Public service delivery – What matters for successful implementation and what can policy leaders do?," Research papers & Policy papers 1705, Policy Center for the New South.
    9. Hildebrand Sean, 2015. "Coerced Confusion? Local Emergency Policy Implementation After September 11," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 273-298, June.
    10. Gakou-Kakeu, Josiane & Di Gregorio, Monica & Paavola, Jouni & Sonwa, Denis Jean, 2022. "REDD+ policy implementation and institutional interplay: Evidence from three pilot projects in Cameroon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    11. Spilsbury, Michael J. & Nasi, Robert, 2006. "The interface of policy research and the policy development process: challenges posed to the forestry community," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 193-205, March.
    12. Ayoki, Milton, 2005. "Trade, informality and the policy process in Uganda," MPRA Paper 101790, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Dec 2009.
    13. Fleury, Marie-Josée & Grenier, Guy & Vallée, Catherine & Hurtubise, Roch & Lévesque, Paul-André, 2014. "The role of advocacy coalitions in a project implementation process: The example of the planning phase of the At Home/Chez Soi project dealing with homelessness in Montreal," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 42-49.
    14. Xiao Tang & Zhengwen Liu & Hongtao Yi, 2016. "Mandatory Targets and Environmental Performance: An Analysis Based on Regression Discontinuity Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Philip Wenzel, 2007. "Public-sector transformation in South Africa," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 7(1), pages 47-64, January.
    16. Adam Wellstead, 2017. "Plus ça Change, Plus C’est La Même Chose? A review of Paul Sabatier’s “An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein”," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 549-561, December.
    17. Li Yu & Wei Xu, 2022. "Institutional conformity, entrepreneurial governance and local contingency: Problematizing central-local dynamics in localizing China's low-income housing policy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(3), pages 508-532, May.
    18. Mladen Djuric & Jovan Filipovic & Stefan Komazec, 2020. "Reshaping the Future of Social Metrology: Utilizing Quality Indicators to Develop Complexity-Based Scientific Human and Social Capital Measurement Model," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 535-567, April.
    19. Pissourios Ioannis A., 2014. "Top-Down and Bottom-Up Urban and Regional Planning: Towards a Framework for The Use of Planning Standards," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Daniel Dramani Kipo-Sunyehzi, 2023. "Implementation Research in Developed and Developing Countries: an Analysis of the Trends and Directions," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1259-1273, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    projektowanie polityki publicznej; implementacja polityki publicznej; sukces implementacyjny w polityce publicznej; heurystyka stadialna polityki publicznej; badania nad polityką publiczną;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:spppps:0251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcin Ochalski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.