IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/jofipe/0087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moving mainstream: benchmarking the European alternative finance market

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Bryan

    (Cambridge Judge Business School)

  • Wardrop, Robert

    (Cambridge Judge Business School)

  • Rau, Raghavendra

    (Cambridge Judge Business School)

  • Gray, Mia

    (Cambridge Judge Business School)

Abstract

Since the global financial crisis, alternative finance — which includes financial instruments and distributive channels that emerge outside of the traditional financial system – has thrived in the U.S., the U.K. and Continental Europe. In particular, online alternative finance, from equity-based crowdfunding to peer-to-peer (P2P) business lending, and from reward-based crowdfunding to debt-based securities, is supplying credit to SMEs, providing venture capital to start-ups, offering more diverse and transparent ways for consumers to invest or borrow money, fostering innovation, generating jobs and funding worthwhile social causes. Although a number of studies, including those carried out by the University of Cambridge and its research partners, 3 have documented the rise of crowdfunding and P2P lending in the U.K., we actually know very little about the size, growth and diversity of various online platform-based alternative finance markets in key European countries. There is no independent, systematic and reliable research to scientifically benchmark the European alternative finance market, nor to inform policymakers, brief regulators, update the press and educate the public. It is in this context that the University of Cambridge has collaborated with EY and 14 leading national/regional industry associations to collect industry data directly from 255 leading platforms in Europe through a web-based questionnaire, capturing an estimated 85%–90% of the European online alternative finance market. This article presents the results of this study, conducted between October 2014 and January 2015.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Bryan & Wardrop, Robert & Rau, Raghavendra & Gray, Mia, 2015. "Moving mainstream: benchmarking the European alternative finance market," Journal of Financial Perspectives, EY Global FS Institute, vol. 3(3), pages 60-76.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:jofipe:0087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Wanxin & Mahmood, Ammara & Sismeiro, Catarina & Vulkan, Nir, 2019. "The evolution of equity crowdfunding: Insights from co-investments of angels and the crowd," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    2. Hyunwoo Woo & So Young Sohn, 2022. "A credit scoring model based on the Myers–Briggs type indicator in online peer-to-peer lending," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Joanna Bednarz & Magdalena Markiewicz & Agnieszka Ploska, 2017. "The determinants and development of crowdfunding in the Central and Eastern Europe countries," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 16(3), pages 275-285, September.
    4. Mohd Afjal, 2023. "Bridging the financial divide: a bibliometric analysis on the role of digital financial services within FinTech in enhancing financial inclusion and economic development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, December.
    5. David Grundy & Carolina Ohmer, 2016. "German crowd-investing platforms: Literature review and survey," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1138849-113, December.
    6. Nikolaos Daskalakis, 2023. "COVID-19 Effects on Reward-based Crowdfunding Campaigns," Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 1-6.
    7. Carlos Serrano-Cinca & Begoña Gutiérrez-Nieto & Luz López-Palacios, 2015. "Determinants of Default in P2P Lending," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Käfer Benjamin, 2018. "Peer-to-Peer Lending – A (Financial Stability) Risk Perspective," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 69(1), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Ana Fernandez-Zubieta & Irene Ramos-Vielba, 2018. "Research & Innovation in Spain 2016," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201702, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), revised 08 Jan 2020.
    10. Xiaocong Yang & Kai Zhao & Xiaobo Tao & Eric Shiu, 2019. "Developing and Validating a Theory-Based Model of Crowdfunding Investment Intention—Perspectives from Social Exchange Theory and Customer Value Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Cornelli, Giulio & Frost, Jon & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Rau, P. Raghavendra & Wardrop, Robert & Ziegler, Tania, 2023. "Fintech and big tech credit: Drivers of the growth of digital lending," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    12. Wierzbicka Katarzyna, 2018. "Crowdfunding as an Alternative Method of Raising Capital," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 56-66, December.
    13. Anil Savio Kavuri & Alistair Milne, 2019. "FinTech and the future of financial services: What are the research gaps?," CAMA Working Papers 2019-18, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crowdfunding; P2P lending; alternative finance markets;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:jofipe:0087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ms Alina Stefan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ey.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.