IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/actuec/v79y2003i1p163-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Que reste-t-il de la théorie du chômage de Keynes?

Author

Listed:
  • Erhel, Christine

    (Université Paris I)

  • Zajdela, Hélène

    (Université d’Evry)

Abstract

During the development of the so-called Keynesian macroeconomics, Keynes’ unemployment theory has lost much of its meaning. This process has first led to a confusion between “involuntary” and “Keynesian” unemployment; then it has put voluntary unemployment back in the debates. Through OECD reports recommendations, we show the emergence of a consensus about the nature and causes of unemployment, which can be linked to the evolution of Keynesian macroeconomics, from IS-LM to WS-PS model. More recently, the neoclassical labour supply theory has been playing an increasing role in unemployment analysis. La théorie du chômage élaborée par Keynes a perdu de sa substance, au cours du développement d’une macroéconomie qui s’est autoqualifiée de keynésienne. Ce processus a abouti dans un premier temps à séparer le chômage involontaire du chômage keynésien, puis à réintroduire le chômage volontaire. À partir des préconisations des rapports officiels de l’OCDE, nous montrons l’émergence d’un consensus. L’analyse de l’évolution des théories « keynésiennes » du chômage de IS-LM jusqu’à WS-PS conduit au constat d’un renouveau du concept de taux de chômage naturel. Plus récemment, l’accent sur les risques de désincitation à l’activité marque la réapparition du second postulat de l’économie classique.

Suggested Citation

  • Erhel, Christine & Zajdela, Hélène, 2003. "Que reste-t-il de la théorie du chômage de Keynes?," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 79(1), pages 163-177, Mars-Juin.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:79:y:2003:i:1:p:163-177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/009681ar
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Rogerson, 1997. "Theory Ahead of Language in the Economics of Unemployment," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 73-92, Winter.
    2. Layard, Richard & Nickell, Stephen & Jackman, Richard, 2005. "Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199279173.
    3. Robert G. King, 2000. "The new IS-LM model : language, logic, and limits," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, issue Sum, pages 45-103.
    4. Jean-Pascal Benassy, 1975. "Neo-Keynesian Disequilibrium Theory in a Monetary Economy," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 42(4), pages 503-523.
    5. Michel De Vroey, 1997. "Involuntary unemployment: the missing piece in Keynes's General Theory," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 258-283.
    6. Blanchard, Olivier Jean & Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro, 1987. "Monopolistic Competition and the Effects of Aggregate Demand," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(4), pages 647-666, September.
    7. repec:bla:scandj:v:91:y:1989:i:2:p:347-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Barro, Robert J & Grossman, Herschel I, 1971. "A General Disequilibrium Model of Income and Employment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 82-93, March.
    9. Weitzman, Martin L, 1985. "The Simple Macroeconomics of Profit Sharing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(5), pages 937-953, December.
    10. repec:bla:econom:v:53:y:1986:i:210(s):p:s121-69 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Christine Erhel & Jérôme Gautié & Bernard Gazier, 1999. "Qu'a-t-on appris sur le lien salaire/ emploi grâce aux débats sur les politiques de l'emploi ?," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(1), pages 257-287.
    12. Oliver Jean Blanchard & Peter Diamond, 1989. "The Beveridge Curve," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 20(1), pages 1-76.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sneessens, Henri R., 1992. "Contraintes de débouchés, capacités de production et chômage dans un modèle macroéconomique avec concurrence imparfaite," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 68(1), pages 140-174, mars et j.
    2. Thierry Laurent & Hélène Zajdela, 1999. "De l'équilibre de sous-emploi au chômage d'équilibre : la recherche des fondements micro-économiques de la rigidité des salaires," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(1), pages 41-65.
    3. Thierry Laurent & Hélène Zajdela, 1999. "Emploi, salaire et coordination des activités," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(1), pages 67-100.
    4. Ichiro Takahashi, 2021. "An Artificial Wicksell—Keynes Macroeconomy," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-16-6839-5, December.
    5. Frederick van der Ploeg, 2005. "Back to Keynes?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 51(4), pages 777-822.
    6. Benassy, Jean-Pascal, 1993. "Nonclearing Markets: Microeconomic Concepts and Macroeconomic Applications," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 732-761, June.
    7. Nicolas Piluso & Gabriel Colletis, 2021. "A Keynesian reformulation of the WS-PS model: Keynesian unemployment and Classical unemployment," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(2), pages 447-460, July.
    8. van Marrewijk, Charles & Verbeek, Jos, 1993. "Disequilibrium Growth Theory in an International Perspective," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 311-331, April.
    9. Brown, Alessio J.G. & Merkl, Christian & Snower, Dennis J., 2011. "Comparing the effectiveness of employment subsidies," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 168-179, April.
    10. repec:zbw:rwirep:0005 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Carlsson, Mikael & Eriksson, Stefan & Gottfries, Nils, 2006. "Testing Theories of Job Creation: Does Supply Create Its Own Demand?," Working Paper Series 194, Sveriges Riksbank (Central Bank of Sweden).
    12. Regis Barnichon & Andrew Figura, 2015. "Labor Market Heterogeneity and the Aggregate Matching Function," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(4), pages 222-249, October.
    13. Hujer, Reinhard & Zeiss, Christopher, 2006. "Macroeconomic Effects of Short-Term Training Measures on the Matching Process in Western Germany," IZA Discussion Papers 2489, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Pascal Michaillat & Emmanuel Saez, 2015. "Aggregate Demand, Idle Time, and Unemployment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(2), pages 507-569.
    15. Miguel Ricaurte, 2010. "The Role of Labor Markets in Structural Change," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 584, Central Bank of Chile.
    16. Mauro Mastrogiacomo & Rob Euwals & Raun van Ooijen, 2010. "Private wealth and planned early retirement: A panel data analysis for the Netherlands 1994-2009," CPB Discussion Paper 160.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    17. Costain, James S. & Reiter, Michael, 2008. "Business cycles, unemployment insurance, and the calibration of matching models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 1120-1155, April.
    18. Yashiv, Eran, 2007. "Labor search and matching in macroeconomics," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 1859-1895, November.
    19. Mankiw, N Gregory, 2001. "The Inexorable and Mysterious Tradeoff between Inflation and Unemployment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(471), pages 45-61, May.
    20. Carsten Ochsen, 2009. "On the measurement of mismatch," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 405-409.
    21. Gerard Ballot & Antoine Mandel & Annick Vignes, 2015. "Agent-based modeling and economic theory: where do we stand?," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 10(2), pages 199-220, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:79:y:2003:i:1:p:163-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Dostie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scseeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.