IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/actuec/v66y1990i3p348-364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facteurs de risque des actions ordinaires : le point de vue des gestionnaires québécois

Author

Listed:
  • Darmon, René

    (ESSEC, France)

  • Khoury, Nabil T.

    (Faculté des sciences de l’administration, Université Laval)

  • Martel, Jean-Marc

    (Faculté des sciences de l’administration, Université Laval)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify the main factors professional fund managers in Québec take into consideration when assessing the riskiness of their investment in common stocks. L’objet de cet article est d’identifier les principaux facteurs que les gestionnaires professionnels de portefeuilles au Québec prennent en considération pour appréhender le risque de leur placement en actions ordinaires.

Suggested Citation

  • Darmon, René & Khoury, Nabil T. & Martel, Jean-Marc, 1990. "Facteurs de risque des actions ordinaires : le point de vue des gestionnaires québécois," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 66(3), pages 348-364, septembre.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:66:y:1990:i:3:p:348-364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/601540ar
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tinic, Seha M & West, Richard R, 1986. "Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: A Revisit," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(1), pages 126-147, February.
    2. Pettit, R. Richardson & Westerfield, Randolph, 1972. "A Model of Capital Asset Risk," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 1649-1668, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Czapkiewicz, Anna & Wójtowicz, Tomasz & Zaremba, Adam, 2023. "Idiosyncratic risk and cross-section of stock returns in emerging European markets," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Adam Zaremba & Jacob Koby Shemer, 2018. "Price-Based Investment Strategies," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-91530-2, December.
    3. K. C. John Wei & Stanley R. Stansell, 1991. "Benchmark Error And The Small Firm Effect: A Revisit," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 14(4), pages 359-369, December.
    4. Andrew Ang & Robert J. Hodrick & Yuhang Xing & Xiaoyan Zhang, 2006. "The Cross‐Section of Volatility and Expected Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 61(1), pages 259-299, February.
    5. M. Reza Bradrania & Maurice Peat & Stephen Satchell, 2022. "Liquidity Costs, Idiosyncratic Volatility and Expected Stock Returns," Papers 2211.04695, arXiv.org.
    6. Amihud, Yakov, 2002. "Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 31-56, January.
    7. Chang, Eric C. & Dong, Sen, 2006. "Idiosyncratic volatility, fundamentals, and institutional herding: Evidence from the Japanese stock market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 135-154, April.
    8. Kyung Shim & Harjoat Bhamra, 2015. "Stochastic Idiosyncratic Operating Risk and Real Options: Implications for Stock Returns," 2015 Meeting Papers 1494, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    9. Elyasiani, Elyas & Mansur, Iqbal, 1998. "Sensitivity of the bank stock returns distribution to changes in the level and volatility of interest rate: A GARCH-M model," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 535-563, May.
    10. Wang, Huijun & Yan, Jinghua & Yu, Jianfeng, 2017. "Reference-dependent preferences and the risk–return trade-off," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 395-414.
    11. Kuiper, Ivo, 2017. "Essays on investing in stock and bond markets," Other publications TiSEM a22daf8a-de91-4f96-8068-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Panayides, Photis M. & Lambertides, Neophytos & Cullinane, Kevin, 2013. "Liquidity risk premium and asset pricing in US water transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 3-15.
    13. Chung, Kee H. & Wang, Junbo & Wu, Chunchi, 2019. "Volatility and the cross-section of corporate bond returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 397-417.
    14. Angelidis, Timotheos & Tessaromatis, Nikolaos, 2008. "Idiosyncratic volatility and equity returns: UK evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 539-556, June.
    15. repec:bla:jfinan:v:58:y:2003:i:5:p:1969-1996 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Adam Zaremba, 2019. "The Cross Section of Country Equity Returns: A Review of Empirical Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, October.
    17. Knut Anton Mork & Hanna Marisela Eap & Magnus Eskedal Haraldsen, 2020. "Portfolio Choice for a Resource-Based Sovereign Wealth Fund: An Analysis of Cash Flows," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Durand, Robert B. & Lan, Yihui & Ng, Andrew, 2011. "Conditional beta: Evidence from Asian emerging markets," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 130-153.
    19. Barardehi, Yashar H. & Bernhardt, Dan & Ruchti, Thomas G., 2019. "A test of speculative arbitrage: is the cross-section of volatility invariant?," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1204, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    20. Nusret Cakici & Isil Erol & Dogan Tirtiroglu, 2014. "Tracking the Evolution of Idiosyncratic Risk and Cross-Sectional Expected Returns for US REITs," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 415-440, April.
    21. Xiaoli Wang, 2017. "Will firm quality determine the relationship between stock return and idiosyncratic volatility? A new investigation of idiosyncratic volatility," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(5), pages 388-404, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:66:y:1990:i:3:p:348-364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Dostie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scseeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.