IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/actuec/v64y1988i4p616-629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technologie et libre-échange : une complicité souhaitable

Author

Listed:
  • Lefebvre, Louis-A.

    (Département des Sciences Administratives, Université du Québec à Montréal)

  • Lefebvre, Élisabeth

    (Département des Sciences Administratives, Université du Québec à Montréal)

Abstract

The impact of free trade on the Canadian economy has recently been largely debated. Yet what do Québec's manufacturers really think? This article attempts to answer that question and establish a link between the level of technological penetration in a company and its top manager's attitude towards free trade. Le libre-échange et ses répercussions sur l’économie ont récemment fait l’objet de nombreux écrits. Mais qu’en pensent les dirigeants des entreprises manufacturières québécoises? Cet article tente de répondre à cette question tout en cherchant à établir une relation entre le degré de pénétration de la technologie dans une entreprise et l’attitude de son dirigeant à l’endroit du libre-échange.

Suggested Citation

  • Lefebvre, Louis-A. & Lefebvre, Élisabeth, 1988. "Technologie et libre-échange : une complicité souhaitable," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 64(4), pages 616-629, décembre.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:64:y:1988:i:4:p:616-629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/601473ar
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack Meredith, 1987. "The strategic advantages of new manufacturing technologies for small firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(3), pages 249-258, May.
    2. John W. Mamer & Kevin F. McCardle, 1987. "Uncertainty, Competition, and the Adoption of New Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 161-177, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David B. Audretsch & Martin A. Carree & Adriaan J. Van Stel & A. Roy Thurik, 2002. "Impeded Industrial Restructuring: The Growth Penalty," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 81-98.
    2. Cowan, Kelly R. & Daim, Tugrul U., 2011. "Review of technology acquisition and adoption research in the energy sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 183-199.
    3. H. Dharma Kwon & Wenxin Xu & Anupam Agrawal & Suresh Muthulingam, 2016. "Impact of Bayesian Learning and Externalities on Strategic Investment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 550-570, February.
    4. T. Ramayah & Osman Mohamad & Azizah Omar & Malliga Marimuthu & Jasmine Yeap Ai Leen, 2012. "The Influence of SME Owners’ Characteristics on Technology Adoption," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 3(3), pages 10-16, September.
    5. Escarce, JoseJ., 1996. "Externalities in hospitals and physician adoption of a new surgical technology: An exploratory analysis," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 715-734, December.
    6. Fehmi Tanrısever & S. Sinan Erzurumlu & Nitin Joglekar, 2012. "Production, Process Investment, and the Survival of Debt‐Financed Startup Firms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 21(4), pages 637-652, July.
    7. Derbyshire, James & Giovannetti, Emanuele, 2017. "Understanding the failure to understand New Product Development failures: Mitigating the uncertainty associated with innovating new products by combining scenario planning and forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 334-344.
    8. Parker, Abdul Rauf, 2000. "Impact on the Organizational Performance of the Strategy-Technology Policy Interaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 55-64, January.
    9. Mallick, Debasish N. & Mukhopadhyay, Samar K., 2001. "Local design vs. global design: A strategic business choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 389-399, June.
    10. Rui Baptista & Roy Thurik, 2004. "The Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Unemployment: is Portugal an Outlier?," Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy 2004-40, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy Group.
    11. Martin Carree & André van Stel & Roy Thurik & Sander Wennekers, 2000. "Business Ownership and Economic Growth in 23 OECD Countries," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 00-001/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. Élisabeth Lefebvre & Louis A. Lefebvre & Marie Josée Roy, 1994. "Technological Penetration and Cumulative Benefits in SMEs," CIRANO Working Papers 94s-18, CIRANO.
    13. Yan Anthea Zhang & Zhuo Emma Chen & Yuandi Wang, 2021. "Which patents to use as loan collaterals? The role of newness of patents' external technology linkage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(10), pages 1822-1849, October.
    14. Rajiv D. Banker & Robert J. Kauffman, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: A Fiftieth-Year Survey of the Literature in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 281-298, March.
    15. Glen M. Schmidt & Evan L. Porteus, 2000. "Sustaining Technology Leadership Can Require Both Cost Competence and Innovative Competence," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Jing, Fei & Lin, Jun & Zhang, Qiao & Qian, Yanjun, 2022. "New technology introduction and product rollover strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 324-336.
    17. Souza, Gilvan C., 2004. "Product introduction decisions in a duopoly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(3), pages 745-757, February.
    18. Li, Ying & Jin, Yanhong H., 2009. "Racing to market leadership: Product launch and upgrade decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 284-297, June.
    19. Meijer, Ineke S.M. & Hekkert, Marko P. & Koppenjan, Joop F.M., 2007. "The influence of perceived uncertainty on entrepreneurial action in emerging renewable energy technology; biomass gasification projects in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5836-5854, November.
    20. Sanjiv Erat & Stylianos Kavadias, 2006. "Introduction of New Technologies to Competing Industrial Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(11), pages 1675-1688, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:actuec:v:64:y:1988:i:4:p:616-629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Dostie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scseeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.