IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ret/ecocri/rec01_08.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Género y usos del tiempo: nuevos enfoques metodológicos

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Carrasco

    (Universidad de Barcelona)

  • Marius Domínguez

    (Universidad de Barcelona)

Abstract

En las últimas décadas, los estudios sobre uso del tiempo han tenido cada vez más importancia. Disponer de información acerca de cómo mujeres y hombres distribuyen su tiempo, entre las distintas actividades a lo largo del día, ha permitido tener una visión más completa y real de la organización social del tiempo y de las diferencias por sexo y otras variables significativas (edad, tipología familiar, etc.). En este artículo se plantea, en primer lugar, un concepto de tiempo que supera la visión estrecha que maneja habitualmente la economía, reconociendo los tiempos que caen fuera de la órbita mercantil. A continuación se discuten las posibilidades metodológicas de un estudio sobre uso del tiempo, realizado en conjunto, con una encuesta sobre trabajo en la ciudad de Barcelona. El objetivo es realizar análisis específicos -poco habituales en este tipo de estudios- en relación a la tipología de hogar, la simultaneidad de actividades, el tiempo de cuidados y el uso del tiempo por franjas horarias. Los resultados muestran la potencialidad de esta metodología para el análisis de la actividad de mujeres y hombres, aunque también se señalan sus limitaciones. Estas guardan relación con la falta de información sobre los aspectos más subjetivos del tiempo que, sin embargo, contribuyen de manera significativa a las desigualdades de género.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Carrasco & Marius Domínguez, 2003. "Género y usos del tiempo: nuevos enfoques metodológicos," Revista de Economía Crítica, Asociación de Economía Crítica, vol. 1, pages 129-152.
  • Handle: RePEc:ret:ecocri:rec01_08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistaeconomiacritica.org/index.php/rec/article/view/69/53
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Sagrario Floro, 1995. "Women's well-being, poverty, and work intensity," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 1-25.
    2. Gary S. Becker, 1981. "A Treatise on the Family," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number beck81-1.
    3. Jacob Mincer, 1962. "Labor Force Participation of Married Women: A Study of Labor Supply," NBER Chapters, in: Aspects of Labor Economics, pages 63-105, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olga De Marco Larrauri & David Pérez Neira & Marta Soler Montiel, 2016. "Indicators for the Analysis of Peasant Women’s Equity and Empowerment Situations in a Sustainability Framework: A Case Study of Cacao Production in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Fernández-Gallego, Berta, 2023. "The Manzanas del Cuidado of Bogotá: The impact of a public policy of care on the mobility of non-remunerated domestic caregivers in the locality of Bosa," SocArXiv ar8n9, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jara-Díaz, Sergio & Rosales-Salas, Jorge, 2017. "Beyond transport time: A review of time use modeling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 209-230.
    2. Marcela Munizaga & Sergio Jara-Díaz & Paulina Greeven & Chandra Bhat, 2008. "Econometric Calibration of the Joint Time Assignment--Mode Choice Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 208-219, May.
    3. Bansak, Cynthia & Grossbard, Shoshana & Wong, Ho-Po Crystal, 2022. "Mothers’ caregiving during COVID: The impact of marital property laws on women’s labor force status," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    4. Claude Diebolt & Faustine Perrin, 2019. "A Cliometric Model of Unified Growth: Family Organization and Economic Growth in the Long Run of History," Studies in Economic History, in: Claude Diebolt & Auke Rijpma & Sarah Carmichael & Selin Dilli & Charlotte Störmer (ed.), Cliometrics of the Family, chapter 0, pages 7-31, Springer.
    5. Sile Padraigin O'Dorchai, 2008. "Do women gain or lose from becoming mothers?," Brussels Economic Review, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 51(2/3), pages 243-268.
    6. Kouladoum, Jean-Claude, 2019. "Décision du mariage des ménages tchadiens et Caractéristiques socio-économiques [Marriage decision of Chadian households and socio-economic characteristics]," MPRA Paper 91590, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Héctor Pifarré i Arolas, 2017. "A cohort perspective of the effect of unemployment on fertility," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 30(4), pages 1211-1239, October.
    8. Miamo Wendji, Clovis & Kouhomou, Clemence Zite, 2020. "Ecart salarial de genre au Cameroun : une analyse de son trend et de son ampleur entre 2001 et 2014 [Gender wage gap in Cameroon : an analysis of the trend and extent between 2001 and 2014]," MPRA Paper 100288, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 May 2020.
    9. Reuben Gronau, 2003. "Jacob Mincer and Labor Supply–Before and Aftermath," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 319-329, December.
    10. Shoshana Grossbard & Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes, 2008. "Cohort-level sex ratio effects on women’s labor force participation," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 309-309, September.
    11. Robert A. Moffitt, 2000. "Welfare Benefits and Female Headship in U.S. Time Series," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(2), pages 373-377, May.
    12. Mincer, Jacob, 1985. "Intercountry Comparisons of Labor Force Trends and of Related Developments: An Overview," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-32, January.
    13. Chandra Bhat & Frank Koppelman, 1999. "A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research," Transportation, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 119-139, May.
    14. Tien Manh Vu, 2019. "Home Appliances And Gender Gap Of Time Spent On Unpaid Housework: Evidence Using Household Data From Vietnam," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 64(01), pages 97-114, March.
    15. Marisol Torres Rodríguez & Patricia González Román, 2009. "Antecedentes teóricos y empíricos del uso de métodos de planificación familiar," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, December.
    16. Bansak, Cynthia & Grossbard, Shoshana & Wong, Crystal (Ho Po), 2021. "Mothers' Caregiving during COVID: The Impact of Divorce Laws and Homeownership on Women's Labor Force Status," IZA Discussion Papers 14408, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Claudia Goldin, 2006. "The Quiet Revolution That Transformed Women's Employment, Education, and Family," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(2), pages 1-21, May.
    18. Kasrin, Zein & Smolny, Werner, 2019. "Female Labor Market Participation and Socioeconomic Development: Disentangling the U-Shaped Hypothesis," MPRA Paper 95561, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Neumark, David & Postlewaite, Andrew, 1998. "Relative income concerns and the rise in married women's employment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 157-183, October.
    20. Grossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana & Granger, Clive, 1998. "Women’s Jobs and Marriage: Baby-Boom versus Baby-Bust (Travail des Femmes et Mariage: du baby-boom au baby-bust)," MPRA Paper 81359, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ret:ecocri:rec01_08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emilio Padilla Rosa (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aecrcea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.