IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v9y2020i5p13-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental orientation and firm performance: The mediation mechanism of green innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Cemal Zehir

    (Professor of Management, School of Business Administration,Yildiz Technical University, Davutpasa, 34500, Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Burcu Ozgul

    (Institute of Social Sciences, Yıldız Technical University,Davutpasa, 34500, Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the mediation effect of green product and green process innovation by focusing on the role of internal and external environmental orientation over firm performance to expand researches on environmental orientation. With this aim, a conceptual model has been recommended by unifying institutional theory and natural resource-based view. Data collected from 315 firms who have ISO14001 Environmental Management Certificate and took part in Turkey’s first and second ISO 500 Industrial Enterprises list in 2018 have been tested by using SmartPLS 3 software as part of Structural Equation Modelling. Empirical proofs show that internal and external environmental orientation has a positive effect on both green product innovation and green process innovation. Additionally, it has been concluded that internal environmental orientation has a direct positive effect on firm performance, while external environmental orientation has an indirect effect, which is through green product and green process innovation. The reason could be rooted in the ecological responsibility feeling of internal environmental orientation. External environmental orientation, though, could be limited only with fulfilling legal requirements with legitimacy acquiring desire. Firms strategically directed to the green product and green process innovation by doing more than the laws require and taking the lead could increase their firm performance. These findings contribute to theory and practice, enriching our understanding of how two dimensions of environmental orientation affect firm performance. Key Words: Internal Environmental Orientation, External Environmental Orientation, Green Product Innovation, Green Process Innovation, Firm Performance

Suggested Citation

  • Cemal Zehir & Burcu Ozgul, 2020. "Environmental orientation and firm performance: The mediation mechanism of green innovation," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(5), pages 13-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:13-25
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i5.883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/883/633
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i5.883
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i5.883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allan P. O. Williams, 2006. "Impact of Strategies," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Rise of Cass Business School, chapter 13, pages 167-181, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Yali Zhang & Jun Sun & Zhaojun Yang & Shurong Li, 2018. "Organizational Learning and Green Innovation: Does Environmental Proactivity Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Muhammad Aminu Haruna & Suraya Mahmood, 2018. "Impact of Energy Consumption and Environmental Pollution in Malaysia," Energy Economics Letters, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(1), pages 31-43.
    4. Seggie, Steven H. & Kim, Daekwan & Cavusgil, S.Tamer, 2006. "Do supply chain IT alignment and supply chain interfirm system integration impact upon brand equity and firm performance?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(8), pages 887-895, August.
    5. Cheng-Li Huang & Fan-Hua Kung, 2010. "Drivers of Environmental Disclosure and Stakeholder Expectation: Evidence from Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 435-451, October.
    6. Huang, Yi-Chun & Ding, Hung-Bin & Kao, Ming-Rea, 2009. "Salient stakeholder voices: Family business and green innovation adoption," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 309-326, July.
    7. Mario Testa & Antonio D’Amato, 2017. "Corporate environmental responsibility and financial performance: does bidirectional causality work? Empirical evidence from the manufacturing industry," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 221-234, June.
    8. Muhammad Aminu Haruna & Suraya Mahmood, 2018. "Impact of Energy Consumption and Environmental Pollution in Malaysia," Energy Economics Letters, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(1), pages 31-43, March.
    9. Nigel Roome, 1992. "Developing environmental management strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 11-24, March.
    10. Richard Heede, 2014. "Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 229-241, January.
    11. Necmi K. Avkiran & Christian M. Ringle (ed.), 2018. "Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-3-319-71691-6, April.
    12. Chan, Ricky Y.K., 2010. "Corporate environmentalism pursuit by foreign firms competing in China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 80-92, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Shakeb Akhtar, 2021. "Firm Sustainable Development Goals and Firm Financial Performance through the Lens of Green Innovation Practices and Reporting: A Proactive Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Shakeb Akhtar, 2022. "Vinculum of Sustainable Development Goal Practices and Firms’ Financial Performance: A Moderation Role of Green Innovation," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liwei Feng & Wenwen Zhao & Hui Li & Yongtao Song, 2018. "The Effect of Environmental Orientation on Green Innovation: Do Political Ties Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Burcu Özgül & Cemal Zehir, 2023. "How Managers’ Green Transformational Leadership Affects a Firm’s Environmental Strategy, Green Innovation, and Performance: The Moderating Impact of Differentiation Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Satria Tirtayasa & A. Akrim & Ade Gunawan & Emilda Sulasmi & Hastin Umi Anisah, 2021. "Significance of Economic Activities in Environmental Protection: Evidence from a Panel of 4-ASEAN Economies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 420-426.
    4. Tri Andjarwati & N. Anggoro Panji & Agus Utomo & Linda Nur Susila & P. Anton Respati & Abdul Talib Bon, 2020. "Impact of Energy Consumption, and Economic Dynamics on Environmental Degradation in ASEAN," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 672-678.
    5. Wenjie Xu & Hyo-Jin Youn & Choong-Ki Lee, 2021. "Role of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for COVID-19 in Cruise Tourists’ Decision-Making Process: An Extended Model of Goal-Directed Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Mohsin Malik & Hadi Ghaderi & Amir Andargoli, 2021. "A resource orchestration view of supply chain traceability and transparency bundles for competitive advantage," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3866-3881, December.
    7. Viktor Fredrich & Siegfried Gudergan & Ricarda B. Bouncken, 2022. "Dynamic Capabilities, Internationalization and Growth of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: The Roles of Research and Development Intensity and Collaborative Intensity," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 611-642, August.
    8. de Villiers, Charl & Alexander, Deborah, 2014. "The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 198-212.
    9. Samuel Ogbeibu & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & James Gaskin & Abdelhak Senadjki & Mathew Hughes, 2021. "Leveraging STARA competencies and green creativity to boost green organisational innovative evidence: A praxis for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2421-2440, July.
    10. Álvarez Gil, M. J. & Burgos Jiménez, J. & Céspedes Lorente, J. J., 2001. "An analysis of environmental management, organizational context and performance of Spanish hotels," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 457-471, December.
    11. İbrahim Demirci, 2020. "School Engagement and Well-Being in Adolescents: Mediating Roles of Hope and Social Competence," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(5), pages 1573-1595, October.
    12. Chin‐jung Luan & Chengli Tien & Pei‐hua Wu, 2013. "Strategizing Environmental Policy and Compliance for Firm Economic Sustainability: Evidence from Taiwanese Electronics Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 517-546, December.
    13. Miguel Perez‐Valls & Jose Cespedes‐Lorente & Juan Moreno‐Garcia, 2016. "Green Practices and Organizational Design as Sources of Strategic Flexibility and Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(8), pages 529-544, December.
    14. Danilo Soares‐Silva & Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes & Alexandre Cappellozza & Cristiano Morini, 2020. "Explaining library user loyalty through perceived service quality: What is wrong?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(8), pages 954-967, August.
    15. José Aurelio Medina-Garrido & José María Biedma-Ferrer & Jaime Sánchez-Ortiz, 2020. "I Can’t Go to Work Tomorrow! Work-Family Policies, Well-Being and Absenteeism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & Rajeev Dwivedi & Ronaldo Gomes Dultra-de-Lima & Claudio Parisi & José Carlos Tiomatsu Oyadomari, 2023. "Role of Emerging Technologies in Accounting Information Systems for Achieving Strategic Flexibility through Decision-Making Performance: An Exploratory Study Based on North American and South American," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 199-218, June.
    17. Lim, Chansu & Lee, Jongsu, 2020. "An analysis of the efficiency of the oil refining industry in the OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    18. Yonas Berhanu & Lars Olav & Ajebu Nurfeta & Ayana Angassa & Jens B. Aune, 2019. "Methane Emissions from Ruminant Livestock in Ethiopia: Promising Forage Species to Reduce CH 4 Emissions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Larry Auyeung & Phoenix Kit Han Mo, 2019. "The Efficacy and Mechanism of Online Positive Psychological Intervention (PPI) on Improving Well-Being Among Chinese University Students: A Pilot Study of the Best Possible Self (BPS) Intervention," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 2525-2550, December.
    20. Anja Schaefer & Brian Harvey, 1998. "Stage models of corporate ‘greening’: a critical evaluation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(3), pages 109-123, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:13-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.