IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v11y2022i10p24-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The interoperability of mobile phone technology as a way to improve immigrant entrepreneurship in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Tatenda Chidau

    (Applied Management, College of Economic & Management Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa)

  • Risimati Khosa

    (Doctor, Senior Lecturer, Applied Management, College of Economic & Management Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa)

Abstract

The paper seeks to illustrate the propinquity between mobile phone technology and the profitability of immigrant entrepreneurs’ businesses and whether there is a positive effect. The outcome should ascertain if mobile technology could be propounded as a credible source of competitive advantage. The paper uses a qualitative approach, using content analysis as the research design tool. Data analysis was done through the conceptual content analysis approach. Various online databases such as EBSCOhost, Google scholar, JSTOR, and Science Direct were accessed for literature. Different terms (keywords) such as; “Mobile phone technology†, “mobile marketing†, and “mobile payment†were searched. The data collected through a systematic literature review were compiled, analysed, and generated conclusions. This paper deduces that immigrant entrepreneurs stand to gain a competitive edge by using mobile phone technology, thereby improving business performance. Future researchers need to expand the scope of their study to other sectors and industries globally. The paper exhibits the significance of apps and websites as mobile technology tools that can positively impact business performance. This paper outlines how mobile technology is now an essential catalyst in the performance of various business sectors. Results are essential to app and website developers, entrepreneurs and the business society. Key Words:Challenges, Mobile Phone, Immigrant Entrepreneurship, SMEs, South Africa, Technology, Xenophobia

Suggested Citation

  • Tatenda Chidau & Risimati Khosa, 2022. "The interoperability of mobile phone technology as a way to improve immigrant entrepreneurship in South Africa," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 24-34, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:24-34
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.2086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/2086/1599
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.2086
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.2086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Chun-Hsien & Chang, Ching-Hsing & Shen, George C., 2015. "The effect of inbound open innovation on firm performance: Evidence from high-tech industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 222-230.
    2. Folashade O. Akinyemi & Oluwabunmi O. Adejumo, 2018. "Government policies and entrepreneurship phases in emerging economies: Nigeria and South Africa," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beverlley Madzikanda & Cai Li & Francis Tang Dabuo, 2021. "What Determines the Geography of Entrepreneurship? A Comparative Study Between Sub-Saharan Africa and South-East Asia," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 7(2), pages 246-262, July.
    2. Hossain, Mokter, 2018. "Motivations, challenges, and opportunities of successful solvers on an innovation intermediary platform," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 67-73.
    3. Seo, Ribin & Park, Ji-Hoon, 2022. "When is interorganizational learning beneficial for inbound open innovation of ventures? A contingent role of entrepreneurial orientation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    4. Wided Ragmoun, 2024. "The impact of environmental entrepreneurship and anti-corruption on environmental degradation," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Colin C. J. Cheng & Eric C. Shiu, 2021. "Establishing a typology of open innovation strategies and their differential impacts on innovation success in an Asia-Pacific developed economy," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 65-89, March.
    6. Valeriya Vlasova & Vitaliy Roud, 2020. "Cooperative Strategies in the Age of Open Innovation: Choice of Partners, Geography and Duration," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(4), pages 80-94.
    7. Chien-Chi Chu & Ya-Fang Cheng & Fu-Sheng Tsai & Sang-Bing Tsai & Kun-Hwa Lu, 2019. "Open Innovation in Crowdfunding Context: Diversity, Knowledge, and Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
    8. Adams, Kweku & Attah-Boakye, Rexford & Yu, Honglan & Johansson, Jeaneth & Njoya, Eric Tchouamou, 2023. "Female board representation and coupled open innovation: Evidence from emerging market multinational enterprises," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    9. Ivan A. Butakov, 2021. "Rigid form of cooperation between industrial enterprises in the natural resources sector: Institutional trap or survival strategy," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(3), pages 31-43, July.
    10. Marisela-Yazmín García-Vidales & Gonzalo Maldonado-Guzmán & Sandra-Yesenia Pinzón-Castro, 2019. "The influence of open innovation practices on business performance in Mexican family and non-family SMEs," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 35(153), pages 370-378, December.
    11. Santos, David Ferreira Lopes & Basso, Leonardo Fernando Cruz & Kimura, Herbert, 2018. "The trajectory of the ability to innovate and the financial performance of the Brazilian industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 258-270.
    12. Ethel Ewoh-Odoyi, 2021. "How Gender Is Recognised in Economic and Education Policy Programmes and Initiatives: An Analysis of Nigerian State Policy Discourse," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Yusra H. M. Babiker & Elfadil Timan & Malik Elnaeem Mohammed Ali, 2023. "The Influence of Government Policies and Economic Factors on the Growth of Entrepreneurial Activities in Khartoum, Sudan," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 13(2), pages 53-73, December.
    14. George Amoako & Paul Omari & Desmond K. Kumi & George Cudjoe Agbemabiase & George Asamoah, 2021. "Conceptual Framework—Artificial Intelligence and Better Entrepreneurial Decision-Making: The Influence of Customer Preference, Industry Benchmark, and Employee Involvement in an Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Zhang, Jingjing & Groen, Aard, 2021. "Informal and formal open activities: Innovation protection methods as antecedents and innovation outputs as consequences," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Rui Torres de Oliveira & Simona Gentile-Lüdecke & Sandra Figueira, 2022. "Barriers to innovation and innovation performance: the mediating role of external knowledge search in emerging economies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1953-1974, April.
    17. Lyu, Yibo & Zhu, Yuqing & Han, Shaojie & He, Binyuan & Bao, Lining, 2020. "Open innovation and innovation "Radicalness"—the moderating effect of network embeddedness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    18. Mahak Bisen & Prakash Sai Lokachari, 2024. "Fostering Academia–Industry R&D Partnerships: A Study in the Indian Context Using Mixed Methods Approach," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Gupta, Shivam & Busso, Donatella & Kamboj, Shampy, 2021. "Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 788-798.
    20. Martinez-Torres, Rocio & Olmedilla, Maria, 2016. "Identification of innovation solvers in open innovation communities using swarm intelligence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 15-24.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:24-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.