IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v10y2021i3p501-513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of motivation and technology factors to predict satisfaction and continued intentions toward online courses

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430072)

  • Muhammad Saqib Khan

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology 1037, Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430074)

Abstract

The rapid developments and diffusion of new technologies abruptly changed world dynamics. This study pursued the motivational factors (controlled and autonomous) and technology factors (perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness) to predict the students perceived satisfaction and continued intention toward MOOCs. Using an online survey, this research collected data from 333 students, and analysis performed through PLS-SEM. The findings revealed that controlled motivation positively influenced the perceived satisfaction. However, autonomous motivation positively affected students perceived satisfaction and continued intention toward MOOCs. The technology factors such as PEU strongly impacted PU. Similarly, PU positively impacted students perceived satisfaction and continued intention toward MOOCs. This research guides essential theoretical insights and provides practical guidelines to educational institutions and technologists to develop and implement systems and strategies in online environments. Key Words:Controlled motivation, autonomous motivation, technology acceptance model, perceived satisfaction, continued intention

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Wang & Muhammad Saqib Khan, 2021. "Impact of motivation and technology factors to predict satisfaction and continued intentions toward online courses," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(3), pages 501-513, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:501-513
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1148/873
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1148
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qing Wang & Muhammad Saqib Khan & Muhammad Kamran Khan, 2021. "Predicting user perceived satisfaction and reuse intentions toward Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in the Covid-19 pandemic," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    3. Necmi K. Avkiran & Christian M. Ringle (ed.), 2018. "Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-3-319-71691-6, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sami S. Binyamin & Md. Rakibul Hoque, 2020. "Understanding the Drivers of Wearable Health Monitoring Technology: An Extension of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Rese, Alexandra & Ganster, Lena & Baier, Daniel, 2020. "Chatbots in retailers’ customer communication: How to measure their acceptance?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Chi-Yo Huang & Hui-Ya Wang & Chia-Lee Yang & Steven J. H. Shiau, 2020. "A Derivation of Factors Influencing the Diffusion and Adoption of an Open Source Learning Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Uzir, Md Uzir Hossain & Al Halbusi, Hussam & Lim, Rodney & Jerin, Ishraq & Abdul Hamid, Abu Bakar & Ramayah, Thurasamy & Haque, Ahasanul, 2021. "Applied Artificial Intelligence and user satisfaction: Smartwatch usage for healthcare in Bangladesh during COVID-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Zhao, Xiaoyun & Susilo, Yusak O. & Pernestål, Anna, 2022. "The dynamic and long-term changes of automated bus service adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 450-463.
    6. Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Vrontis, Demetris, 2022. "Does remote work flexibility enhance organization performance? Moderating role of organization policy and top management support," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1501-1512.
    7. Matti J. Haverila & Kai Haverila & Caitlin McLauglin, 2024. "The Impact of Perceived Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) on Attitude Toward Usage, Behavioral Intentions, and Actual Usage," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    8. Dalal Bamufleh & Amani Saud Alshamari & Asrar Saud Alsobhi & Hanan Hisham Ezzi & Waad Sultan Alruhaili, 2021. "Exploring Public Attitudes toward E-Government Health Applications Used During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Computer and Information Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(3), pages 1-1, August.
    9. Mónica Martínez-Gómez & Eliseo Bustamante & César Berna-Escriche, 2022. "Development and Validation of an E-Learning Education Model in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study in Secondary Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Cecilia Temilola Olugbara & Moeketsi Letseka & Oludayo O. Olugbara, 2021. "Multiple Correspondence Analysis of Factors Influencing Student Acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Ramkumar, M. & Schoenherr, Tobias & Wagner, Stephan M. & Jenamani, Mamata, 2019. "Q-TAM: A quality technology acceptance model for predicting organizational buyers’ continuance intentions for e-procurement services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 333-348.
    12. Juan-Gabriel Martínez-Navalón & María Fernández-Fernández & Fernanda Pedrosa Alberto, 2023. "Does privacy and ease of use influence user trust in digital banking applications in Spain and Portugal?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 781-803, June.
    13. Maduku, Daniel K. & Thusi, Philile, 2023. "Understanding consumers' mobile shopping continuance intention: New perspectives from South Africa," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Alberto Peralta & Luis Rubalcaba, 2021. "How Governance Paradigms and Other Drivers Affect Public Managers’ Use of Innovation Practices. A PLS-SEM Analysis and Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-28, May.
    15. Benjamin T. Hazen & Robert E. Overstreet & Yacan Wang, 2015. "Predicting Public Bicycle Adoption Using the Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Determinants of Industrial Internet of Things Adoption in German Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Pankaj Tiwari, 2021. "Electronic banking adoption in Ethiopia: an empirical investigation," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(9), pages 1-28, September.
    18. Marjan Shamsi & Tatiana Iakovleva & Espen Olsen & Richard P. Bagozzi, 2021. "Employees’ Work-Related Well-Being during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrated Perspective of Technology Acceptance Model and JD-R Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Syed Sardar Muhammad & Bidit Lal Dey & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2018. "Analysis of Factors that Influence Customers’ Willingness to Leave Big Data Digital Footprints on Social Media: A Systematic Review of Literature," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 559-576, June.
    20. Ukrit Suksanguan & Somsak Siwadamrongpong & Thanapong Champahom & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Tassana Boonyoo & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2022. "Structural Equation Model of Factors Influencing the Selection of Industrial Waste Disposal Service in Cement Kilns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:501-513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.