IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v9y2014i2p7-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Free Trade Semantic Disagreements”: Why Wto-Style Multilateral Liberalization And Ftas Stand Much Closer To Protectionism

Author

Listed:
  • Octavian-Dragomir JORA

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Alexandru BUTISEACA

    (The Romanian-American University)

Abstract

It is “mainstream” to say that the World Trade Organization (WTO) and Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) lead to the liberalization of the member states’ economies. Even “old school” pro free trade authors, known nowadays rather as being “against the tide” for promoting unilateral measures outside the WTO / FTAs sphere, still advocate, in an utilitarian manner, the need for commerce agreements between countries or regions as a way of extending the genuine free trade, basically due to two main reasons. Firstly, the economic gains from international trade are consolidated and improved when more countries or regions agree on a mutual reduction of commercial barriers, and by widening the markets, concerted liberalization of commerce increases competition and specialization amongst countries, thus giving a bigger impulse to both efficiency and consumers’ incomes. econdly, the multilateral cut-offs of trade barriers may deter political opposition against free trade in each of the countries involved, since those groups that otherwise would have opposed or would have been indifferent to the commercial reform may join the campaign for free trade provide they see export opportunities to the other member countries of these trade agreements. Such lines of reasoning are, in our understanding, a too charitable way of reading the reality, and to look at trade agreements between governments as drivers of the freedom to trade is a “false friend”, a piece of wishful thinking, a semantic illusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Octavian-Dragomir JORA & Alexandru BUTISEACA, 2014. "“Free Trade Semantic Disagreements”: Why Wto-Style Multilateral Liberalization And Ftas Stand Much Closer To Protectionism," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 9(2), pages 7-28, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:9:y:2014:i:2:p:7-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/journl/SU14/REBE-SU14-A1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rose, Andrew K., 2004. "Do WTO members have more liberal trade policy?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 209-235, July.
    2. Iacob Mihaela, 2011. "Fetişizarea analizei cost-beneficiu în decizia publică de alocare a resurselor," Revista OEconomica, Romanian Society for Economic Science, Revista OEconomica, issue 04, December.
    3. Andrew K. Rose, 2004. "Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(1), pages 98-114, March.
    4. Bhagwati, Jagdish, 2008. "Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195331653.
    5. Jora Octavian-Dragomir, 2009. "Trei teorii liberale ale proprietăţii şi fundamentele analizei economice în termeni de proprietate (IV – Analiza contrafactuală a aproprierii)," Revista OEconomica, Romanian Society for Economic Science, Revista OEconomica, issue 04, December.
    6. Iacob Mihaela, Moşteanu Tatiana, 2010. "Criteriul Pareto şi cazul principial al “statului creator de bunuri publice”," Revista OEconomica, Romanian Society for Economic Science, Revista OEconomica, issue 01, March.
    7. Banks, Gary, 1984. "Vested interests, domestic transparency and international trade policy," Intereconomics – Review of European Economic Policy (1966 - 1988), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19(3), pages 133-136.
    8. Salvatore,Dominick (ed.), 1993. "Protectionism and World Welfare," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521424899, January.
    9. Deepak Lal, 2005. "The Threat To Economic Liberty From International Organizations," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 25(3), pages 503-520, Fall.
    10. Frey, Bruno S, et al, 1984. "Consensus and Dissension among Economists: An Empirical Inquiry," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(5), pages 986-994, December.
    11. Salvatore,Dominick (ed.), 1993. "Protectionism and World Welfare," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521414555, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rolf J. Langhammer, 2010. "Unordnung in der internationalen Handelsordnung: Befunde, Gründe, Auswirkungen und Therapien," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 11(1), pages 75-98, February.
    2. Flach, Lisandra & Gräf, Fabian, 2020. "The impact of trade agreements on world export prices," Munich Reprints in Economics 70372, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    3. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Cultural Gravity Effects among Migrants: A Comparative Analysis of the EU15," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 91(3), pages 343-380, July.
    4. Peter Egger & Douglas Nelson, 2011. "How Bad Is Antidumping? Evidence from Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(4), pages 1374-1390, November.
    5. Eromenko, Igor & Mankovska, Nadiya & Dean, James W, 2003. "Will WTO membership really improve market access for Ukrainian exports?," MPRA Paper 67481, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Dutt, Pushan & Mihov, Ilian & Van Zandt, Timothy, 2013. "The effect of WTO on the extensive and the intensive margins of trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 204-219.
    7. Ames, Glenn C. W. & Gunter, Lewell & Davis, Claudia D., 1996. "Analysis of USA-European Community oilseeds agreements," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 97-112, November.
    8. Gabriel Felbermayr & Wilhelm Kohler, 2010. "Does WTO Membership Make a Difference at the Extensive Margin of World Trade?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Zdenek Drabek (ed.), Is the World Trade Organization Attractive Enough for Emerging Economies?, chapter 8, pages 217-246, Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Aichele, Rahel & Felbermayr, Gabriel, 2012. "Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 336-354.
    10. Pedro J. Martinez Edo, 2011. "Reciprocal liberalization: Bilateral, plurilateral or multilateral?," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: United Nations ESCAP (ed.), Trade beyond Doha: Prospects for Asia-Pacific Least Developed Countries, Studies in Trade and Investment 76, chapter 4, pages 60-94, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    11. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:6:y:2004:i:24:p:1-9 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Jose Caetano & Aurora Galego, 2007. "In Search for the Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade within an Enlarged Europe," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 5(2), pages 163-183.
    13. Lisandra Flach & Fabian Gräf, 2018. "The Impact of Trade Agreements on World Export Prices," CESifo Working Paper Series 7032, CESifo.
    14. Tomohiro Kuroda, 2004. "Local content protection reconsidered: the case of domestic monopsonist," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 6(24), pages 1-9.
    15. Honggue Lee, 1997. "A Perspective on the Effects of NAFTA on Korea," NBER Chapters, in: Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements, pages 223-274, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Oatley Thomas, 2010. "Real Exchange Rates and Trade Protectionism," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Annie Tubadji & Brian Osoba & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Culture-based development in the USA: culture as a factor for economic welfare and social well-being at a county level," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 39(3), pages 277-303, August.
    18. Lall, Somik V. & Jun Koo & Chakravorty, Sanjoy, 2003. "Diversity matters - the economic geography of industry location in India," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3072, The World Bank.
    19. Gunter, Lewell F. & Ames, Glenn C.W., 1997. "The U.S. Mexican Winter Market Trade Dispute," Faculty Series 16682, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    20. Gordon H. Hanson, 2012. "The Rise of Middle Kingdoms: Emerging Economies in Global Trade," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 41-64, Spring.
    21. repec:dgr:rugsom:01c48 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Lane, Nathaniel, 2016. "Manufacturing Revolutions: Industrial Policy and Industrialization in South Korea," SocArXiv 6tqax, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:9:y:2014:i:2:p:7-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.