IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rvofce/ofce_0751-6614_1989_num_29_1_1193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fusions et acquisitions dans l'industrie européenne

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Garella

Abstract

[fre] Au cours des années récentes le nombre et l'importance des fusions ou acquisitions d'entreprises se sont considérablement accrus dans les pays européens. Quels en sont les objectifs ? Quelles en sont les conséquences pour l'entreprise, la croissance et l'emploi ? Cet article s'efforce de répondre, autant que faire se peut, à ces questions, les données pertinentes n'étant pas toujours disponibles. Il s'attache d'abord à donner un bilan chiffré des évolutions récentes, ce qui permet de souligner la spécificité des transformations en cours par rapport aux décennies passées. Il en étudie ensuite les fondements en recherchant les motivations qui inspirent les regroupements d'entreprises par acquisitions ou par fusions. Celles-ci permettraient de substituer des équipes dynamiques à une direction inefficiente, pour le plus grand profit des actionnaires, et de réaliser des économies d'échelle potentielles, notamment en matière de recherche et développement. Elles serviraient aussi à rationaliser la gestion. L'analyse de nombreux cas particuliers, ainsi qu'un survol des études existantes, montre que l'entité issue de la fusion n'est pas toujours jugée par le marché plus rentable que les entreprises préexistantes à l'opération ; que les regroupements peuvent être défensifs, par exemple pour maintenir une position dominante dans la perspective d'une intensification de la concurrence — plutôt que destinée à améliorer la productivité ; que les directions des firmes acheteuses ne sont pas toujours plus performantes que celles des firmes achetées, etc. Parce que l'étude générale ne permet pas vraiment de trancher entre visions optimistes et pessimistes des conséquences des fusions d'entreprises, on examine enfin le cas de secteurs particuliers (sidérurgie et chimie) et celui d'un pays nouvellement membre de la CE (l'Espagne). La complexité des organisations industrielles comme celle des structures de marché n'autorisent pas encore l'élaboration d'une théorie générale du phénomène. [eng] In recent years, both the number and the size of mergers and takeovers have risen considerably in European countries. What are their objectives ? What are their effects on the firms themselves, on growth and on employment ? This paper attempts to answer such questions, to the best of our ability, given that relevant data are not always readily available. First, a quantitative picture of recent developments is provided, which serves to emphasize the specificity of currently observed moves, relative to what had happened earlier. The most commonly invoked motives for mergers and takeovers are then reviewed. Such moves would serve to displace inefficient management, for the benefit of shareholders, and to achieve economies of scale, most notably with respect to R & D. A number of case studies and a short survey of the existing literature suggest that the new organisation resulting from the merger is not always regarded by financial markets as potentially more profitable than the existing firms ; that mergers may be induced by defensive motives, such as the desire to maintain a dominant position in a market, in the prospect of enhanced competition — rather than to increase productivity ; that the management of buying firms does not always perform better than that of the targets, etc. Since the results of these general studies do not allow us to reach any definite conclusion in favour of either the optimistic or the pessimistic views with respect to the overall consequences of mergers and takeovers, we turn to some specific industries (steel and chemicals) and to the particular case of a new member-state of the European Community, namely Spain. The complexity of industrial organisations and that of market structures are such as to prevent the development of a general theory of mergers and takeovers.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Garella, 1989. "Fusions et acquisitions dans l'industrie européenne," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 29(1), pages 185-219.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1989_num_29_1_1193
    DOI: 10.3406/ofce.1989.1193
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ofce.1989.1193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ofce.1989.1193
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ofce_0751-6614_1989_num_29_1_1193
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ofce.1989.1193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stein, Jeremy C, 1988. "Takeover Threats and Managerial Myopia," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(1), pages 61-80, February.
    2. Dixit, Avinash, 1980. "The Role of Investment in Entry-Deterrence," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 90(357), pages 95-106, March.
    3. Firth, Michael, 1979. "The Profitability of Takeovers and Mergers," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 89(354), pages 316-328, June.
    4. Michael Gort, 1969. "An Economic Disturbance Theory of Mergers," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 83(4), pages 624-642.
    5. Mueller,Dennis C., 2009. "Profits in the Long Run," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521101592, September.
    6. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1988. "Value Maximization and the Acquisition Process," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 7-20, Winter.
    7. Zoltan J. Acs & David B. Audretsch, 2008. "Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis," Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, chapter 1, pages 3-15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Lintner, John, 1971. "Expectations, Mergers and Equilibrium in Purely Competitive Securities Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(2), pages 101-111, May.
    9. Bradley, Michael & Desai, Anand & Kim, E. Han, 1988. "Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 3-40, May.
    10. Partha Dasgupta & Joseph Stiglitz, 1980. "Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&D," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, Spring.
    11. Lewellen, Wilbur G, 1971. "A Pure Financial Rationale for the Conglomerate Merger," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 26(2), pages 521-537, May.
    12. Phlips,Louis, 1983. "The Economics of Price Discrimination," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521283946, September.
    13. A. Michael Spence, 1977. "Entry, Capacity, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 8(2), pages 534-544, Autumn.
    14. James W. Brock, 1987. "Bigness Is the Problem, Not the Solution," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 11-16, May.
    15. Walter Adams, 1987. "Economic Power and the Constitution," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 17-25, May.
    16. Jarrell, Gregg A & Brickley, James A & Netter, Jeffry M, 1988. "The Market for Corporate Control: The Empirical Evidence Since 1980," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 49-68, Winter.
    17. Jensen, Michael C, 1988. "Takeovers: Their Causes and Consequences," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 21-48, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elisabeth Kremp, 1995. "Restructurations et rentabilité économique dans l'industrie française de 1985 à 1992," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 120(4), pages 29-44.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martynova, M. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2005. "Takeover Waves : Triggers, Performance and Motives," Discussion Paper 2005-029, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    2. Martynova, M., 2006. "The market for corporate control and corporate governance regulation in Europe," Other publications TiSEM 8651e281-4914-41f2-ac14-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Martynova, Marina & Renneboog, Luc, 2008. "A century of corporate takeovers: What have we learned and where do we stand?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 2148-2177, October.
    4. Dickerson, Andrew P. & Gibson, Heather D. & Tsakalotos, Euclid, 2002. "Takeover risk and the market for corporate control: the experience of British firms in the 1970s and 1980s," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(8), pages 1167-1195, October.
    5. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    6. Song, Moon H. & Walkling, Ralph A., 2005. "Anticipation, Acquisitions and Bidder Returns," Working Paper Series 2005-11, Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics.
    7. Basnet, Anup & Davis, Frederick & Walker, Thomas & Zhao, Kun, 2021. "The effect of securities class action lawsuits on mergers and acquisitions," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    8. Carroll, Carolyn & Griffith, John M., 2010. "Toeholds, rejected offers, and bidder gains: Do rebuffed bidders put targets in play to profit from their toeholds?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 214-221, May.
    9. Ali-Yrkkö, Jyrki, 2002. "Mergers and Acquisitions - Reasons and Results," Discussion Papers 792, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    10. Sokolyk, Tatyana, 2011. "The effects of antitakeover provisions on acquisition targets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 612-627, June.
    11. Fridolfsson, Sven-Olof & Stennek, Johan, 1999. "Why Mergers Reduce Profits, and Raise Share Prices," Working Paper Series 511, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 03 Dec 2001.
    12. Daniel F. Spulber, 1992. "Economic Analysis And Management Strategy: A Survey," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(3), pages 535-574, September.
    13. Martynova, M. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2006. "Mergers and Acquisitions in Europe," Other publications TiSEM 531d24e9-4f1e-4df3-80db-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Kaplan, Steven N & Weisbach, Michael S, 1992. "The Success of Acquisitions: Evidence from Divestitures," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(1), pages 107-138, March.
    15. Martynova, M. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2006. "The Performance of the European Market for Corporate Control : Evidence from the 5th Takeover Wave," Discussion Paper 2006-118, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    16. Richards, Timothy J. & Manfredo, Mark R., 2003. "Cooperative Mergers and Acquisitions: The Role of Capital Constraints," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(1), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Drew Fudenberg, 2015. "Tirole's Industrial Regulation and Organization Legacy in Economics," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 117(3), pages 771-800, July.
    18. Bhagat, Sanjai & Dong, Ming & Hirshleifer, David & Noah, Robert, 2005. "Do tender offers create value? New methods and evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 3-60, April.
    19. Banerjee, Ajeyo & Owers, James E., 1996. "The impact of the nature and sequence of multiple bids in corporate control contests," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 23-43, December.
    20. João Carvalho Santos & Manuel Portugal Ferreira & Nuno Rosa Reis & Martinho Ribeiro Almeida, 2012. "Mergers & acquisitions research: A bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals," Working Papers 91, globADVANTAGE, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1989_num_29_1_1193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ofce .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.