IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/reveco/reco_0035-2764_1993_num_44_4_409477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

« Mercantilisme technologique » et politique commerciale stratégique : réflexions sur la localisation de l'industrie mondiale des semiconducteurs

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Barbet
  • Laurent Benzoni

Abstract

[eng] "Technological mercantilism" and strategic trade policy reflexions about the localisation of the semiconductor industry. . The aim of mis paper is to analyse the mechanism of localisation of the semiconductor industry. The theoritical grounds are the eclectic and synthetic analysis of multinational firms. The flrst part focuses on the technical organisation of this jndustry. We show that access to public funds and the existence of organisational learning effects explain the low level of internationalisation of this industry. Afterwords, the paper goes on to show how governemental poticies, by protecting national firrns with technological program : us closed to foreign firms, play a major role in the localisation of activities. This "technological mercantilism" creates and maintains strategie alliances between firms but the consequences of these alliances on competition remains difficult to evaluate. [fre] « Mercantilisme technologique » et politique commerciale stratégique. Réflexions sur la localisation de l'industrie mondiale des semi-conducteurs. . L'objet de cet article est d'analyser les mécanismes de localisation de l'industrie des semi-conducteurs à la lumière des analyses éclectiques et synthétiques de la multinationalisation. Nous montrons que le découpage des activités de pro­duction ne conduit pas à un modèle d'organisation unique exploitant parfaitement les avantages comparatifs des différentes zones géographiques. Il semble que les stratégies d'accès aux subventions publiques et les phénomènes d'apprentissage organisationnels aient conduit à une relative inertie des firmes en matière de loca­lisation. Nous montrons qu'un certain nombre d'actions gouvernementales, ciblées principalement sur la protection des phases amont du processus de production (recherche fondamentale) ont effectivement joué un rôle important dans les stratégies de localisation/délocalisation. Ce « mercantilisme technologique » favorise des alliances dont la pérennité et les conséquences sont encore difficiles à évaluer.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Barbet & Laurent Benzoni, 1993. "« Mercantilisme technologique » et politique commerciale stratégique : réflexions sur la localisation de l'industrie mondiale des semiconducteurs," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 44(4), pages 755-778.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1993_num_44_4_409477
    DOI: 10.3406/reco.1993.409477
    Note: DOI:10.3406/reco.1993.409477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/reco.1993.409477
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/reco_0035-2764_1993_num_44_4_409477
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/reco.1993.409477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James A. Brander & Barbara J. Spencer, 1981. "Tariffs and the Extraction of Foreign Monopoly Rents under Potential Entry," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 14(3), pages 371-389, August.
    2. A J Scott & D P Angel, 1987. "The US Semiconductor Industry: A Locational Analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 19(7), pages 875-912, July.
    3. Krugman, Paul R., 1989. "Industrial organization and international trade," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 20, pages 1179-1223, Elsevier.
    4. Barbara J. Spencer & James A. Brander, 1983. "International R & D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 50(4), pages 707-722.
    5. Roger Guesnerie & Jean Tirole, 1985. "L'économie de la recherche-développement : introduction à certains travaux théoriques," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 36(5), pages 843-872.
    6. Michel Rainelli, 1991. "L'économie industrielle internationale : une discipline en construction," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 55(1), pages 5-11.
    7. Jean Tirole, 1988. "The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262200716, April.
    8. Baldwin, Robert E, 1992. "Are Economists' Traditional Trade Policy Views Still Valid?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 804-829, June.
    9. Jean-Louis Mucchielli, 1991. "Alliances stratégiques et firmes multinationales : une nouvelle théorie pour de nouvelles formes de multinationalisation," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 55(1), pages 118-134.
    10. Yoshino, M.Y., 1974. "The Multinational Spread of Japanese Manufacturing Investment since World War II," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 357-381, October.
    11. Helpman, Elhanan, 1984. "A Simple Theory of International Trade with Multinational Corporations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 92(3), pages 451-471, June.
    12. R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), 1989. "Handbook of Industrial Organization," Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 2, number 2.
    13. R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), 1989. "Handbook of Industrial Organization," Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brander, James A., 1995. "Strategic trade policy," Handbook of International Economics, in: G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 27, pages 1395-1455, Elsevier.
    2. Bletschacher, Georg, 1991. "Ansätze strategischer Handels- und Industriepolitik: Ein Überblick," Kiel Working Papers 487, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Dewit, Gerda & Leahy, Dermot, 2004. "Rivalry in uncertain export markets: commitment versus flexibility," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 195-209, October.
    4. Iñaki Aguirre, 1999. "Information transmission and incentives not to price discriminate," Spanish Economic Review, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 1(3), pages 283-299.
    5. Neary, J Peter & Leahy, Dermot, 2000. "Strategic Trade and Industrial Policy towards Dynamic Oligopolies," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 110(463), pages 484-508, April.
    6. J. Peter Neary, 2000. "Monopolistic Competition and International Trade Theory," Working Papers 200025, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    7. Kresimir Zigic, 2001. "Strategic Trade Policy, Spillovers, and the Uncertain Mode of," Industrial Organization 0012008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Michel Rainelli, 1996. "La firme multinationale dans la nouvelle économie industrielle internationale," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 231(1), pages 5-11.
    9. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    10. Simon P. Anderson & Régis Renault, 2011. "Price Discrimination," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 22, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Qu, Zhan & Raff, Horst & Schmitt, Nicolas, 2018. "Incentives through inventory control in supply chains," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 486-513.
    12. Boone, J., 2004. "Balance of Power," Other publications TiSEM d3f8cd4b-eaf0-4c1c-aed4-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Tesfatsion, Leigh, 2001. "Structure, behavior, and market power in an evolutionary labor market with adaptive search," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 25(3-4), pages 419-457, March.
    14. Luís Cabral, 2018. "We’re Number 1: Price Wars for Market Share Leadership," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2013-2030, May.
    15. Micha Gisser & Raymond Sauer, 2000. "The Aggregate Relation between Profits and Concentration is Consistent with Cournot Behavior," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 16(3), pages 229-246, May.
    16. Aghion, Philippe & Akcigit, Ufuk & Howitt, Peter, 2014. "What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 515-563, Elsevier.
    17. Boone, Jan, 2004. "Balance of Power," CEPR Discussion Papers 4733, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Kovác, Eugen & Vinogradov, Viatcheslav & Zigic, Kresimir, 2010. "Technological leadership and persistence of monopoly under endogenous entry: Static versus dynamic analysis," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1421-1441, August.
    19. Martin Gaynor, "undated". "What Do We Know About Competition and Quality in Health Care Markets?," GSIA Working Papers 2006-E62, Carnegie Mellon University, Tepper School of Business.
    20. Valentiny, Pál, 2019. "Közgazdaságtan a jogalkalmazásban [Forensic economics]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 134-162.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1993_num_44_4_409477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/reco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.