IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_2016_num_483_1_10680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enquête Famille et Logements adossée au Recensement de 2011 : comment s’adapter à la nouvelle méthodologie des enquêtes annuelles et quels apports ?

Author

Listed:
  • Pascale Breuil-Genier
  • Guillemette Buisson
  • Isabelle Robert-Bobée
  • Loïc Trabut

Abstract

[fre] Des enquêtes spécifiques sur la famille sont adossées au Recensement de la population depuis 1954. Le changement de méthode du recensement, avec un passage à des enquêtes par sondage chaque année, a nécessité de revoir la méthodologie des enquêtes associées. L’enquête sur la famille et les logements de 2011 est la première enquête couplée au nouveau recensement. Elle a permis de tester la faisabilité d’un tel couplage et de mettre en place le protocole de collecte associé, sans impact négatif sur le recensement. Cette enquête apporte, comme les enquêtes Famille précédentes, des informations complémentaires (dénombrement des personnes pacsées ou des familles recomposées par exemple) et une meilleure compréhension des résultats du recensement (comparaison des réponses des mêmes personnes dans les deux sources).

Suggested Citation

  • Pascale Breuil-Genier & Guillemette Buisson & Isabelle Robert-Bobée & Loïc Trabut, 2016. "Enquête Famille et Logements adossée au Recensement de 2011 : comment s’adapter à la nouvelle méthodologie des enquêtes annuelles et quels apports ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 483(1), pages 205-226.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2016_num_483_1_10680
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.2016.10680
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.2016.10680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2016.10680
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_2016_num_483_1_10680
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.2016.10680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loïc Trabut & Éva Lelièvre & Estelle Bailly, 2015. "Famille et recensement font-ils bon ménage ?," Population (french edition), Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), vol. 70(3), pages 637-665.
    2. Arnaud Régnier-Loilier & Eva Beaujouan & Catherine Villeneuve-Gokalp, 2009. "Neither single, nor in a couple. A study of living apart together in France," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 21(4), pages 75-108.
    3. Guy Desplanques, 2008. "Avantages et incertitudes des enquêtes annuelles de recensement en France," Population (french edition), Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), vol. 63(3), pages 477-501.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vianney Costemalle, 2017. "How long do situations of single parenthood last? An estimation based on French data," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 493, pages 87-112.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnaud Régnier-Loilier & Daniele Vignoli, 2014. "Similar incidence, different nature? Characteristics of Living Apart Together relationships in France and Italy," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2014_11, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    2. Stefan Mauritz & Michael Wagner, 2021. "LAT relationships: A new living arrangement among the oldest old population in Germany?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(14), pages 349-362.
    3. Christine Schnor, 2015. "Does waiting pay off for couples? Partnership duration prior to household formation and union stability," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(22), pages 611-652.
    4. Marie Bergström & Léonard Moulin, 2022. "Couple Formation is Prolonged not Postponed. New Paths to Union Formation in Contemporary France," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(5), pages 975-1008, December.
    5. Paulina Gałęzewska & Brienna Perelli-Harris & Ann Berrington, 2017. "Cross-national differences in women's repartnering behaviour in Europe: The role of individual demographic characteristics," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(8), pages 189-228.
    6. Pierre Pistre, 2016. "Recensements de la population pour l’étude des reprises démographiques et des migrations résidentielles dans l’espace peu dense (1975‑2011)," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 483(1), pages 151-178.
    7. Christine Schnor, 2013. "Does waiting pay off? The effect of partnership duration prior to household formation on union stability," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2013-016, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    8. Lonneke van den Berg, 2023. "The educational gradient in young singlehood: The role of gender and the gender climate," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(6), pages 153-188.
    9. Carole Bonnet & Fanny Godet & Anne Solaz, 2019. "Gendered economic determinants of couple formation over 50 in France," Working Papers G2019/13, French Institute for Demographic Studies.
    10. Ernestina Coast & Alex Fanghanel & Eva Lelièvre & Sara Randall, 2016. "Counting the Population or Describing Society? A Comparison of English and Welsh and French Censuses," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 32(2), pages 165-188, May.
    11. Inge Pasteels & Vicky Lyssens-Danneboom & Dimitri Mortelmans, 2017. "A Life Course Perspective on Living Apart Together: Meaning and Incidence Across Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 799-817, January.
    12. Alisa C. Lewin, 2018. "Intentions to Live Together Among Couples Living Apart: Differences by Age and Gender," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 34(5), pages 721-743, December.
    13. Barbara Elisabeth Fulda, 2016. "The diversity in longitudinal partnership trajectories during the transition to adulthood: How is it related to individual characteristics and regional living conditions?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(37), pages 1101-1134.
    14. Nicolas Robette, 2020. "The Life Courses of Young Adults in France: Changes in Social and Gender Differentiation over the Long Period," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 514-515-5, pages 9-28.
    15. Arnaud Régnier-Loilier, 2016. "Partnership trajectories of people in stable non-cohabiting relationships in France," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(40), pages 1169-1212.
    16. Sandra Krapf, 2018. "Moving in or Breaking Up? The Role of Distance in the Development of Romantic Relationships," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 34(3), pages 313-336, August.
    17. Aart C. Liefbroer & Anne-Rigt Poortman & Judith Seltzer, 2015. "Why do intimate partners live apart? Evidence on LAT relationships across Europe," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(8), pages 251-286.
    18. Anne-Lise Biotteau & Carole Bonnet & Emmanuelle Cambois, 2019. "Risk of Major Depressive Episodes After Separation: The Gender-Specific Contribution of the Income and Support Lost Through Union Dissolution," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(3), pages 519-542, July.
    19. Arnaud Régnier-Loilier & Daniele Vignoli, 2018. "The diverse nature of living apart together relationships: an Italy–France comparison," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 1-22, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2016_num_483_1_10680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.