IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_1992_num_258_1_5692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'effet de serre : pourquoi une approche par la tarification ?

Author

Listed:
  • Sylviane Gastaldo

Abstract

[fre] L'effet de serre : pourquoi une approche par la tarification ? . L'effet de serre et le réchauffement de la terre semblent appelés à s'accentuer dans l'avenir, d'autant plus rapidement qu'aucune mesure ne sera prise pour limiter les activités à l'origine de l'augmentation de la concentration des gaz à effet de serre. . L'utilisation d'un instrument fiscal conduit à modifier les prix de l'énergie (en tarifant pour chaque combustible les émissions de carbone dont il est à l'origine), ce qui guide de façon décentralisée l'ensemble des agents économiques dans leurs décisions privées d'utilisation d'énergie et assure que l'ensemble des mesures de réduction des émissions de carbone présentant un coût inférieur au taux de taxe seraient adoptées. . Selon les études économiques disponibles le coût d'adaptation (en termes de PIB et de bien-être) de nos économies à de telles mesures fiscales pourrait être raisonnable pour des réductions importantes d'émissions de carbone, et ce d'autant plus que les recettes de la taxe seraient habilement "recyclées" ou réutilisées. . Problème global, l'effet de serre doit être traité à l'échelle mondiale : des mesures isolées auraient un faible impact. Cependant des taxes sur le carbone ont déjà été mises en place dans plusieurs pays d'Europe du Nord. [eng] The Greenhouse Effect : Why Use a Pricing Approach? . The greenhouse effect and global warming look set to increase in the future, and even more rapidly if no measures are taken to restrict the activities responsible for the increase in the concentration of gases that produce the greenhouse effect. . Economic studies suggest that the cost (in terms of GDP and welfare) of adapting our economies to such tax measures could be reasonable for large reductions in CO2 emissions. This would be even more the case should the tax receipts be skilfully "recycled" or reused. . The use of a tax instrument leads to changes in energy The greenhouse effect is a global problem and should be prices by pricing each fuel according to the CO2 emissions that it produces. This is a decentralized way of guiding economic agents in their private decisions concerning the use of energy. It also ensures the adoption of all CO2 emission reduction measures that cost less than the tax rate. . dealt with on an international scale. Isolated measures would have little impact. Nevertheless, CO2 taxes have already been introduced in several North European countries. [spa] El efecto invernadero : I por que un enfoque mediante la tarification ? . El efecto invernadero y el recalentamiento de la tierra parecen estar destinados a acentuarse en el futuro, tanto mâs râpidamente cuanto que no se tomarâ ninguna medida para limitar las actividades que originan el aumento de la concentraciôn de gases que lo provocan. . La utilizaciôn de un instrumente) fiscal conduce a modificar los precios de energîa (tarif icando para cada combustible las emanaciones de carbono que origina) lo que guia de manera descentralizada al conjunto de los agentes econômicos en sus decisiones privadas de utilizaciôn de energfa. Tal instrumenta permite también que sean adoptadas medidas de reducciôn de las emanaciones de carbono que representen un costo inferior al monto de la tasa. . Segûn estudios econômicos disponibles, el costo de adaptaciôn (en términos de PIB y de bienestar) de nuestras economîas a taies medidas fiscales podrfa ser razonable para reducciones importantes de emanaciones de carbono, tanto mâs cuanto que los beneficios de la tasa serian hâbilmente "reciclados" o reutilizados. . Problema global, el efecto invernadero debe ser tratado a escala mundial : las medidas aisladas tendrian un escaso impacto. Sin embargo, ya han sido implementadas tasas sobre el carbono en varios pafses de Europa del Norte.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylviane Gastaldo, 1992. "L'effet de serre : pourquoi une approche par la tarification ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 258(1), pages 45-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1992_num_258_1_5692
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1992.5692
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1992.5692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.1992.5692
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_1992_num_258_1_5692
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.1992.5692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Dean & Peter Hoeller, 1992. "Costs of Reducing CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Six Global Models," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 122, OECD Publishing.
    2. D. W. Barns & J. A. Edmonds & J. M. Reilly, 1992. "Use of the Edmonds-Reilly Model to Model Energy-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 113, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jérôme Rieu, 2002. "Politiques nationales de lutte contre le changement climatique et réglementation de la concurrence : le cas de la fiscalité," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 155(4), pages 95-113.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maddison, David, 1995. "A cost-benefit analysis of slowing climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(4-5), pages 337-346.
    2. Jean-Marc Burniaux & Joaquim Oliveira Martins, 1992. "Effet de serre et relations Nord-Sud," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 258(1), pages 55-68.
    3. Aasness, Jorgen & Bye, Torstein & Mysen, Hans Terje, 1996. "Welfare effects of emission taxes in Norway," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 335-346, October.
    4. Tomáš Brzobohatý & Petr Janský, 2010. "Impact of CO 2 Emissions Reductions on Firms’ Finance in an Emerging Economy: The Case of the Czech Republic," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 17(4), pages 725-736, December.
    5. Kverndokk,S. & Rosendahl,E., 2000. "CO2 mitigation costs and ancillary benefits in the Nordic countries, the UK and Ireland : a survey," Memorandum 34/2000, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    6. Xavier Labandeira & Miguel Rodriguez, 2004. "The Effects of a Sudden CO2 reduction in Spain," Others 0412001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Zhang, Zhong Xiang, 1998. "Macroeconomic Effects of CO2 Emission Limits: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis for China," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 213-250, April.
    8. Snorre Kverndokk & Lars Lindholt & Knut Rosendahl, 2000. "Stabilization of CO 2 concentrations: mitigation scenarios using the Petro model," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 3(2), pages 195-224, June.
    9. Domenico Morrone & Rosamartina Schena & Danilo Conte & Candida Bussoli & Angeloantonio Russo, 2022. "Between saying and doing, in the end there is the cost of capital: Evidence from the energy sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 390-402, January.
    10. Paul Ekins, 1995. "Rethinking the costs related to global warming: A survey of the issues," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(3), pages 231-277, October.
    11. Jaccard, Mark & Montgomery, W David, 1996. "Costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the USA and Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(10-11), pages 889-898.
    12. Murota, Yasuhiro & Ito, Kokichi, 1996. "Global warming and developing countries : The possibility of a solution by accelerating development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(12), pages 1061-1077, December.
    13. Robert G. Skinner, 1993. "World energy future: the demand side challenge," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 17(3), pages 181-190, August.
    14. McKitrick, Ross R., 1998. "The econometric critique of computable general equilibrium modeling: the role of functional forms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 543-573, October.
    15. Ekins, Paul, 1996. "How large a carbon tax is justified by the secondary benefits of CO2 abatement?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 161-187, June.
    16. Pani, Ratnakar & Mukhopadhyay, Ujjaini, 2013. "Management accounting approach to analyse energy related CO2 emission: A variance analysis study of top 10 emitters of the world," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 639-655.
    17. Linda Ferguson & Peter Mcgregor & J. Kim Swales & Karen Turner & Ya Ping Yin, 2005. "Incorporating sustainability indicators into a computable general equilibrium model of the scottish economy," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 103-140.
    18. Kydes, Andy S. & Shaw, Susan H. & McDonald, Douglas F., 1995. "Beyond the horizon: Recent directions in long-term energy modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 131-149.
    19. P. Bagnoli & W. J. McKibbin & P. J. Wilcoxen, "undated". "Global Economic Prospects: Medium Term Projections and Structural Change," Discussion Papers 121, Brookings Institution International Economics.
    20. Shukla, P. R., 1995. "Greenhouse gas models and abatement costs for developing nations : A critical assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(8), pages 677-687, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1992_num_258_1_5692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.