IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlpol/v2003y2003i2id402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kultivace institucionálního rámce jako základní přínos vstupu České republiky do Evropské unie
[Cultivation of an institutional framework as a fundamental benefit of integration of the Czech republic into European union]

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Klvačová

Abstract

Since the start of economic transformation, the Czech Republic has been viewed as the country enjoying the best starting position and the best results as regards its economic level and its macroeconomic stabilization, but also as a country where the institutional framework is less adapted to supplying the needs of a market economy than Hungarian or Polish institutional framework. The fact that prior to accession the Czech Republic will have to implement Community directives and other relevant Community acts in its national legislation and that on accession it will be subject not only to Community primary law, but also to secondary legislation (e.g. especially regulations), is of fundamental benefit, even though it cannot be quantified.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Klvačová, 2003. "Kultivace institucionálního rámce jako základní přínos vstupu České republiky do Evropské unie [Cultivation of an institutional framework as a fundamental benefit of integration of the Czech republ," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2003(2), pages 236-253.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2003:y:2003:i:2:id:402
    DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.402.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.402.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.polek.402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Stiglitz, 1999. "Whither Reform? Ten Years of the Transition," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, vol. 7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sudip Ranjan Basu, 2005. "Correlating Growth with Well-Being during Economic Reforms Evidence from India and China," Development and Comp Systems 0509010, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Yang, Qing Gong & Temple, Paul, 2012. "Reform and competitive selection in China: An analysis of firm exits," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 286-299.
    3. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2001. "The Soft Budget Constraint: A Theoretical Clarification," Post-Print hal-00629160, HAL.
    4. Campos, Nauro F & Giovannoni, Francesco, 2006. "The Determinants of Asset Stripping: Theory and Evidence from the Transition Economies," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(2), pages 681-706, October.
    5. Ebru Solakoglu & M. Solakoglu & Nazmi Demir, 2013. "The Role of Progress Factors Explaining Inefficiencies in Transition Countries," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 19(3), pages 261-274, February.
    6. Hellman, Joel S. & Jones, Geraint & Kaufmann, daniel, 2000. ""Seize the state, seize the day": state capture, corruption, and influence in transition," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2444, The World Bank.
    7. Jacques Fontanel, 2000. "Les désagréments économiques de l’absence d’Etat. L’exemple de la Russie," Post-Print hal-02877208, HAL.
    8. Klara Sabirianova Peter & Jan Svejnar & Katherine Terrell, 2012. "Foreign Investment, Corporate Ownership, and Development: Are Firms in Emerging Markets Catching Up to the World Standard?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(4), pages 981-999, November.
    9. Daianu, Daniel & Vranceanu, Radu, 2003. "Subduing High Inflation In Romania. How To Better Monetary And Exchange Rate Mechanisms?," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 5-36, September.
    10. Dic Lo, 2010. "China versus the Washington Consensus: The Anomaly for World Bank Advocacy Research," Working Papers 164, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
    11. Wladimir Andreff, 2004. "Would a Second Transition Stage Prolong the Initial Period of Post-socialist Economic Transformation into Market Capitalism?," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 1(1), pages 7-31, June.
    12. Polona Domadenik & Lubomír Lízal & Marko Pahor, 2012. "The Effect of Enterprise Break-Ups on Performance. The Case of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 63(5), pages 849-866.
    13. Brown, J David & Earle, John, 2001. "Privatization, Competition and Reform Strategies: Theory and Evidence from Russian Enterprise Panel Data," CEPR Discussion Papers 2758, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Catherine Locatelli, 2020. "Une lecture institutionnaliste de la réforme du secteur gazier russe," Working Papers hal-02734835, HAL.
    15. Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2012. "Reforming the power sector in transition: Do institutions matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1675-1682.
    16. Sudip Ranjan Basu, 2008. "Institution and Development Revisited:A Nonparametric Approach," IHEID Working Papers 05-2008, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies, revised Mar 2008.
    17. Das Gupta, Monica & Grandvoinnet, Helene & Romani, Mattia, 2000. "State-community synergies in development : laying the basis for collective action," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2439, The World Bank.
    18. Vladimir Mau, 2012. "Post-communist Country Assistance Programs: Some Approaches to Evaluation of Factors Affecting Their Efficiency," Working Papers 0038, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, revised 2012.
    19. Vitaliy Zheka, 2005. "Corporate governance, ownership structure and corporate efficiency: the case of Ukraine," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(7), pages 451-460.
    20. Scott Burd & Carolyn Currie, 2004. "Partnering with the Private Sector to Introduce New Physical, Human, and Social Capital - Isolating Criteria for Success," Working Paper Series 133, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    integration; European Union; institutional framework; Community primary law; secondary legislation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)
    • P21 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2003:y:2003:i:2:id:402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.