IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlcfu/v2014y2014i2id394p52-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Principal-Agent Theory and its Influence on the Quality of Assurance Services
[Vliv vztahů zastoupení na kvalitu informací poskytovaných ověřovacími službami]

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Bobek

Abstract

The article deals with the principal-agent theory and its application on provision of the assurance services. It describes influence which the principal-agent theory might have on the quality of information provided by the assurance services. The article defines stakeholders and shareholders of a company and their role in relation to provision of the assurance services, and then briefly presents the principal-agent theory. The influence of the principal-agent theory on the assurance services is ultimately studied in two ways, based on whether the subject who ordered the service is the main user of the provided information, or not. The agency costs are analyzed taking into account the amount of materiality and the amount of differences which are mentioned in management letter.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Bobek, 2014. "The Principal-Agent Theory and its Influence on the Quality of Assurance Services [Vliv vztahů zastoupení na kvalitu informací poskytovaných ověřovacími službami]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(2), pages 52-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcfu:v:2014:y:2014:i:2:id:394:p:52-68
    DOI: 10.18267/j.cfuc.394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cfuc.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cfuc.394.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cfuc.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cfuc.394.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.cfuc.394?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donna M. Carlon & Alexis Downs, 2014. "Stakeholder Valuing: A Process for Identifying the Interrelationships between Firm and Stakeholder Attributes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Jiří Hlaváček & Michal Hlaváček, 2006. ""Principal - Agent" Problem in the Context of the Economic Survival [Problém "principál - agent" při maximalizaci pravděpodobnosti ekonomického přežití]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(3), pages 18-33.
    3. Ross, Stephen A, 1973. "The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 134-139, May.
    4. Tomáš Buus, 2011. "The Agency Cost from the Point of View of Financial Markets [Náklady zastoupení v koncernu pohledem finančního trhu]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(4), pages 52-67.
    5. George A. Akerlof, 1970. "The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 84(3), pages 488-500.
    6. Paul M. Healy & Krishna G. Palepu, 2003. "The Fall of Enron," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 3-26, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ece ZEYBEK YILMAZ & Göksel ATAMAN BERK, 2020. "Vekâlet Kuramına Göre Türkiye’deki Otellerin Pazara Giriş Stratejilerinin Değerlendirilmesi," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(88), pages 145-168, June.
    2. Edward P. Lazear, 1995. "Personnel Economics," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262121883, April.
    3. Olivier Meier & Aurélie Sannajust, 0. "The smart contract revolution: a solution for the holdup problem?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    4. Vegas, E & Ganimian, A. J., 2013. "Theory and Evidence on Teacher Policies in Developed and Developing Countries," Working Paper 104291, Harvard University OpenScholar.
    5. Wu, Zhenyu & Chua, Jess H. & Chrisman, James J., 2007. "Effects of family ownership and management on small business equity financing," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 875-895, November.
    6. An, Suwei, 2023. "Essays on incentive contracts, M&As, and firm risk," Other publications TiSEM dd97d2f5-1c9d-47c5-ba62-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2017. "The Revolution of Information Economics: The Past and the Future," NBER Working Papers 23780, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. James J. Chrisman & Kristen Madison & Taewoo Kim, 2021. "A Dynamic Framework of Noneconomic Goals and Inter-Family Agency Complexities in Multi-Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(4), pages 906-930, July.
    9. Julia Heidemann & Marcus Kaiser & Mathias Klier & Florian Probst, 2012. "Customer lifetime value-based sales force control in the financial services industry— an incentive-compatible remuneration model," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 27-51, September.
    10. González-Moralejo, Silvia Andrés & Muñoz, Pablo Muñoz & Miquel, Juan Francisco López, 2015. "Firm Size, Contractual Problems and Organizational Decision-Making: Logistics for Perishable Goods," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Bengt Holmstrom, 1999. "Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective," NBER Working Papers 6875, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Yanlong Zhang, 2021. "The Demsetz’s Evolutionary Theory of Property Rights as Applied to Rural Land of China: A Supplement," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Nathalie Moureau & Dorothée Rivaud Danset, 2004. "L'incertitude dans les théories économiques," Post-Print hal-03995208, HAL.
    14. Otto Keck, 1987. "The Information Dilemma," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 31(1), pages 139-163, March.
    15. Heritier Adrienne & Mueller-Debus Anna K & Thauer Christian R, 2010. "The Firm as an Inspector: Private Ordering and Political Rules," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-34, January.
    16. Holmstrom, Bengt R. & Tirole, Jean, 1989. "The theory of the firm," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 2, pages 61-133, Elsevier.
    17. Claudinê Jordão de Carvalho, 2015. "Conditioning Factors of Late Payment of Trade Credit," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 0(2), pages 72-91, August.
    18. Fasshauer, Stephan, 2001. "Das Principal-Agent-Verhältnis zwischen Bevölkerung und Politik als zentrales Problem der Alterssicherung in Deutschland," W.E.P. - Würzburg Economic Papers 31, University of Würzburg, Department of Economics.
    19. Darcy W. E. Allen & Jason Potts & Julian Waters-Lynch & Max Parasol, 2024. "Costly Signalling in DAOs," Papers 2406.18457, arXiv.org.
    20. Stephan Bartke & Reimund Schwarze, 2021. "The Economic Role and Emergence of Professional Valuers in Real Estate Markets," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Principal-Agent Theory; Assurance Services; Audit; Materiality; Vztahy zastoupení; Ověřovací služby; Materialita;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G02 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcfu:v:2014:y:2014:i:2:id:394:p:52-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.