IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pos/journl/65-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landholders' Satisfaction with Compulsory Acquisition and Compensation Process in Bauchi, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Usman Adekunle

    (Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University)

  • Hadiza Tijjani Bello

    (Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University)

  • Samirah Ibrahim Jibril

    (Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University)

  • Ibrahim Idris

    (Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University)

Abstract

This research aims to assess Landholder's satisfaction with the compulsory acquisition and compensation process in Bauchi to identify areas of weakness in the process and propose areas of improvement. The study adopted the quantitative approach and data collected through questionnaire survey from 327 landholders affected by the compulsory acquisition and compensation exercise by the Bauchi State Government. The data collected were subjected to descriptive with mean ranking, frequency distribution. The study revealed that landholders were very satisfied before the process of compulsory acquisition, during the process of mandatory purchase, they were also happy. Still, during the compensation process, they were very dissatisfied. It recommended that the Government should make the process of compensation more transparent. JEL Classification: Q15

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Usman Adekunle & Hadiza Tijjani Bello & Samirah Ibrahim Jibril & Ibrahim Idris, 2020. "Landholders' Satisfaction with Compulsory Acquisition and Compensation Process in Bauchi, Nigeria," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 6(12), pages 2007-2011, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pos:journl:65-4
    DOI: 10.22178/pos.65-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/831
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22178/pos.65-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas K. Tagliarino, 2017. "The Status of National Legal Frameworks for Valuing Compensation for Expropriated Land: An Analysis of Whether National Laws in 50 Countries/Regions across Asia, Africa, and Latin America Comply with ," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Honig, Lauren & Mulenga, Brian P., 2015. "The Status of Customary Land and the Future of Smallholder Farmers Under the Current Land Administration System in Zambia," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 229597, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas K. Tagliarino & Yakubu A. Bununu & Magbagbeola O. Micheal & Marcello De Maria & Akintobi Olusanmi, 2018. "Compensation for Expropriated Community Farmland in Nigeria: An In-Depth Analysis of the Laws and Practices Related to Land Expropriation for the Lekki Free Trade Zone in Lagos," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-38, February.
    2. Sitko, Nicholas J. & Chamberlin, Jordan & Hichaambwa, Munguzwe, 2015. "The Geography of Customary Land in Zambia: Is Development Strategy Engaging With The Facts?," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 211222, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    3. Tuan Nguyen Tran, 2021. "The consequences of expropriation of agricultural land and loss of livelihoods on those households who lost land in Da Nang, Vietnam," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 26-38, June.
    4. John R. Owen & Vlado Vivoda & Deanna Kemp, 2020. "Country-level governance frameworks for mining-induced resettlement," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4907-4928, June.
    5. Zhongcheng Yan & Feng Wei & Xin Deng & Chuan Li & Yanbin Qi, 2021. "Does Land Expropriation Experience Increase Farmers’ Farmland Value Expectations? Empirical Evidence from the People’s Republic of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Partson Paradza & Joseph Awoamim Yacim & Benita Zulch, 2022. "Benchmarking Zimbabwe'S Global Compensation Agreement Against The Provisions Of Existing Laws Guiding Compensation For Expropriated Properties," AfRES 2022-058, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
    7. Sankalp Sharma & Anil Giri & Tajamul Haque & Iuliia Tetteh, 2018. "Land Acquisition in India: A Pareto and Kaldor-Hicks Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12, May.
    8. Alice Nikuze & Richard Sliuzas & Johannes Flacke, 2020. "From Closed to Claimed Spaces for Participation: Contestation in Urban Redevelopment Induced-Displacements and Resettlement in Kigali, Rwanda," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Nkomoki, William & Bavorová, Miroslava & Banout, Jan, 2018. "Adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and food security threats: Effects of land tenure in Zambia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 532-538.
    10. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. de Vries, 2020. "Can In-Kind Compensation for Expropriated Real Property Promote Spatial Justice? A Case Study Analysis of Resettlement in Kigali City, Rwanda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-34, May.
    11. Linshu Qiu & Dongxiao Yang & Kairong Hong, 2023. "Multidimensional Preference Game and Extreme Dispute Resolution for Optimal Compensation of House Expropriation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Zulu-Mbata, Olipa & Chapoto, Antony & Hichaambwa, Munguzwe, 2016. "Determinants of Conservation Agriculture Adoption among Zambian Smallholder Farmers," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 251855, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    13. Ali, Daniel Ayalew & Deininger, Klaus, 2021. "Does title increase large farm productivity? Institutional determinants of large land-based investments' performance in Zambia," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315328, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Ali, Daniel Ayalew & Deininger, Klaus, 2022. "Institutional determinants of large land-based investments’ performance in Zambia: Does title enhance productivity and structural transformation?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Honig, Lauren, 2017. "Selecting the State or Choosing the Chief? The Political Determinants of Smallholder Land Titling," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 94-107.
    16. Liz Alden Wily, 2018. "Collective Land Ownership in the 21st Century: Overview of Global Trends," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-26, May.
    17. Wen, Lanjiao & Chatalova, Lioudmila & Butsic, Van & Hu, Fox ZhiYong & Zhang, Anlu, 2020. "Capitalization of land development rights in rural China: A choice experiment on individuals’ preferences in peri-urban Shanghai," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    18. Chidakel, Alexander & Child, Brian, 2022. "Convergence and divergence in the economic performance of wildlife tourism within multi-reserve landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    19. William J. Burke & Serena Li & Dingiswayo Banda, 2018. "Female access to fertile land and other inputs in Zambia: why women get lower yields," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(4), pages 761-775, December.
    20. Chenxi Li & Zenglei Xi, 2019. "Social Stability Risk Assessment of Land Expropriation: Lessons from the Chinese Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    landholder's satisfaction; compulsory acquisition; compensation process;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pos:journl:65-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andrey Kataev (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pathofscience.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.