IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v6y2017i2p37-d100274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Status of National Legal Frameworks for Valuing Compensation for Expropriated Land: An Analysis of Whether National Laws in 50 Countries/Regions across Asia, Africa, and Latin America Comply with International Standards on Compensation Valuation

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas K. Tagliarino

    (Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 72, 9700 AB Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The challenges associated with determining fair compensation for expropriated land have been extensively discussed and debated among scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and the public. However, to date, a comprehensive study of national-level compensation procedures established by law considering whether such procedures meet internationally recognized standards on compensation valuation has not been conducted. This article aims to bridge this gap by serving as a reference point and informing “fair compensation” debates among scholars, practitioners, and policymakers. This article examines national-level legal provisions on compensation in 50 countries/regions across Asia, Africa, and Latin America against a set of legal indicators that are based on international standards on the valuation of compensation. The legal indicators focus on the substantive and procedural requirements pertaining to the calculation of compensation. The indicators ask whether laws require assessors to account for various land values when calculating compensation, and whether there are legal processes in place that allow affected persons to negotiate compensation amounts, receive prompt payments, and hold governments accountable by appealing compensation decisions in courts or before tribunals. The results of the study show that most of the 50 countries/regions assessed do not have national laws that comply with internationally recognized standards on the valuation of compensation. Based on the findings from the legal indicator analysis, this paper presents a set of recommendations for reforming compensation procedures to bring them into conformity with international standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas K. Tagliarino, 2017. "The Status of National Legal Frameworks for Valuing Compensation for Expropriated Land: An Analysis of Whether National Laws in 50 Countries/Regions across Asia, Africa, and Latin America Comply with ," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:6:y:2017:i:2:p:37-:d:100274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/6/2/37/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/6/2/37/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prakash Kashwan, 2015. "Forest Policy, Institutions, and REDD+ in India, Tanzania, and Mexico," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 15(3), pages 95-117, August.
    2. Cernea, Michael, 1997. "The risks and reconstruction model for resettling displaced populations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(10), pages 1569-1587, October.
    3. Behrman, Julia & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Quisumbing, Agnes, 2011. "The gender implications of large-scale land deals:," IFPRI discussion papers 1056, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Anthony Burns & Klaus Deininger & Harris Selod, 2012. "The Land Governance Assessment Framework : Identifying and Monitoring Good Practice in the Land Sector," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2376.
    5. ., 2015. "Recall, rationality and political economy," Chapters, in: Game Theory and Public Policy, Second Edition, chapter 9, pages 141-164, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Hall, Todd H. & Ross, Andrew A.G., 2015. "Affective Politics after 9/11," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 69(4), pages 847-879, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicholas K. Tagliarino & Yakubu A. Bununu & Magbagbeola O. Micheal & Marcello De Maria & Akintobi Olusanmi, 2018. "Compensation for Expropriated Community Farmland in Nigeria: An In-Depth Analysis of the Laws and Practices Related to Land Expropriation for the Lekki Free Trade Zone in Lagos," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-38, February.
    2. Tuan Nguyen Tran, 2021. "The consequences of expropriation of agricultural land and loss of livelihoods on those households who lost land in Da Nang, Vietnam," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 26-38, June.
    3. Linshu Qiu & Dongxiao Yang & Kairong Hong, 2023. "Multidimensional Preference Game and Extreme Dispute Resolution for Optimal Compensation of House Expropriation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Muhammad Usman Adekunle & Hadiza Tijjani Bello & Samirah Ibrahim Jibril & Ibrahim Idris, 2020. "Landholders' Satisfaction with Compulsory Acquisition and Compensation Process in Bauchi, Nigeria," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 6(12), pages 2007-2011, December.
    5. Liz Alden Wily, 2018. "Collective Land Ownership in the 21st Century: Overview of Global Trends," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Zhongcheng Yan & Feng Wei & Xin Deng & Chuan Li & Yanbin Qi, 2021. "Does Land Expropriation Experience Increase Farmers’ Farmland Value Expectations? Empirical Evidence from the People’s Republic of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. de Vries, 2020. "Can In-Kind Compensation for Expropriated Real Property Promote Spatial Justice? A Case Study Analysis of Resettlement in Kigali City, Rwanda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-34, May.
    8. John R. Owen & Vlado Vivoda & Deanna Kemp, 2020. "Country-level governance frameworks for mining-induced resettlement," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4907-4928, June.
    9. Wen, Lanjiao & Chatalova, Lioudmila & Butsic, Van & Hu, Fox ZhiYong & Zhang, Anlu, 2020. "Capitalization of land development rights in rural China: A choice experiment on individuals’ preferences in peri-urban Shanghai," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    10. Alice Nikuze & Richard Sliuzas & Johannes Flacke, 2020. "From Closed to Claimed Spaces for Participation: Contestation in Urban Redevelopment Induced-Displacements and Resettlement in Kigali, Rwanda," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Partson Paradza & Joseph Awoamim Yacim & Benita Zulch, 2022. "Benchmarking Zimbabwe'S Global Compensation Agreement Against The Provisions Of Existing Laws Guiding Compensation For Expropriated Properties," AfRES 2022-058, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
    12. Sankalp Sharma & Anil Giri & Tajamul Haque & Iuliia Tetteh, 2018. "Land Acquisition in India: A Pareto and Kaldor-Hicks Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Chenxi Li & Zenglei Xi, 2019. "Social Stability Risk Assessment of Land Expropriation: Lessons from the Chinese Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pietrapertosa, Filomena & Khokhlov, Valeriy & Salvia, Monica & Cosmi, Carmelina, 2018. "Climate change adaptation policies and plans: A survey in 11 South East European countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3041-3050.
    2. World Bank, 2019. "Securing Forest Tenure Rights for Rural Development," World Bank Publications - Reports 34183, The World Bank Group.
    3. Patil, Vikram & Ghosh, Ranjan & Kathuria, Vinish & Farrell, Katharine N., 2020. "Money, Land or self-employment? Understanding preference heterogeneity in landowners’ choices for compensation under land acquisition in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Rabah Arezki & Klaus Deininger & Harris Selod, 2015. "What Drives the Global "Land Rush"?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 207-233.
    5. Bidhan Kanti Das & Nabanita Guha, 2016. "How do Women Respond in the Context of Acquisition of Agricultural Land? A Micro Level Study in Semi-urban South Bengal, India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 10(2), pages 253-269, August.
    6. Patil, Vikram S. & Ghosh, Ranjan, 2015. "Farmer Displacement and Marginalization: A Transaction Cost Explanation from an Irrigation Project in India," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 229378, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Lupale Mubanga & Hampwaye Godfrey, 2019. "Inclusiveness of Urban Land Administration in the City of Lusaka, Zambia," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 46(46), pages 53-70, December.
    8. Isabella Alcañiz & RicardoA. Gutierrez, 2020. "Between the Global Commodity Boom and Subnational State Capacities:Payment for Environmental Services to Fight Deforestation inArgentina," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 20(1), pages 38-59, February.
    9. Nicholas K. Tagliarino & Yakubu A. Bununu & Magbagbeola O. Micheal & Marcello De Maria & Akintobi Olusanmi, 2018. "Compensation for Expropriated Community Farmland in Nigeria: An In-Depth Analysis of the Laws and Practices Related to Land Expropriation for the Lekki Free Trade Zone in Lagos," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-38, February.
    10. Marcin Wiśniewski & Krzysztof Šyskawa, 2020. "Development Impact Bonds in Financing Flood Risk Management," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 67(4), pages 437-452, December.
    11. Thierry Ngoga & Francois Ntaganda & Karim Tushabe & David Niyonsenga & Nadia Ingabire & Pothin Muvara, 2017. "Land Governance Assessment Framework," World Bank Publications - Reports 28492, The World Bank Group.
    12. Dzodzi  Tsikata, 2016. "Gender, Land Tenure and Agrarian Production Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Nikita Sud, 2020. "The Unfixed State of Unfixed Land," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(5), pages 1175-1198, September.
    14. Björn Hoops & Nicholas K. Tagliarino, 2019. "The Legal Boundaries of ‘Public Purpose’ in India and South Africa: A Comparative Assessment in Light of the Voluntary Guidelines," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Reddy, A Amarender, 2018. "(2018) Involuntary Resettlement as an Opportunity for Development: The Case of Urban Resettlers of the New Tehri Town, Journal of Land and Rural Studies 6(2) 1–25," AgriXiv szu6a, Center for Open Science.
    16. Wegenast, Tim & Richetta, Cécile & Krauser, Mario & Leibik, Alexander, 2022. "Grabbed trust? The impact of large-scale land acquisitions on social trust in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Damania, Richard & Joshi, Anupam & Russ, Jason, 2020. "India’s forests – Stepping stone or millstone for the poor?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    18. Julia Kloos & Niklas Baumert, 2015. "Preventive resettlement in anticipation of sea level rise: a choice experiment from Alexandria, Egypt," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(1), pages 99-121, March.
    19. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Randell, Heather, 2016. "The short-term impacts of development-induced displacement on wealth and subjective well-being in the Brazilian Amazon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 385-400.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:6:y:2017:i:2:p:37-:d:100274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.