IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v9y2021p367-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing city household water consumption with internet of things devices

Author

Listed:
  • Ioan Florin VOICU

    (ING Tech, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Daniel Constantin DIACONU

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This research aims to prove that inexpensive Internet of Things devices can be used to monitor domestic water consumption, thus lowering water usage, educating consumers about better water habits and preventing or detecting leaks. Such devices can also expose their information to the local water utility company, which can then use these data points in their decision-making. This paper is built on direct experience and research with Home Assistant, a free and open-source Internet of Things device management system, which allows for detailed statistics to be compiled at database level about water consumption, including the effects of optimizing daily usage. The main method employed was a case study comparing household water consumption before and after sensors and valves were implemented, with 4 stages: 1 - no sensor info, 2 - with sensors but no changes made to habits, 3 - sensor info analysis, 4 - changes made to habits based on the previous analysis, 5 - before/after result comparison. Key results included: 20% water consumption reduction after daily habit changes; broken pipe smartphone notification while residents were away, alongside automatic water closure to the household; detection of leaks which were too small to be visible at water meter level, but nevertheless existed. Implications of the study for smart city practitioners are that even inexpensive water sensors and valves can significantly reduce water usage and prevent incidents, quickly paying for themselves and allowing for a more sustainable level of water consumption at city level. The value of this paper is that it shows how a combination of off-the-shelf sensors and valves and free software can be used at household or even city level to bring intelligent water management to communities which might be suffering from the effects of climate change or other causes of water scarcity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioan Florin VOICU & Daniel Constantin DIACONU, 2021. "Reducing city household water consumption with internet of things devices," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 9, pages 367-377, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:9:y:2021:p:367-377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/381/346
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/381
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sou-Sen Leu & Quang-Nha Bui, 2016. "Leak Prediction Model for Water Distribution Networks Created Using a Bayesian Network Learning Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(8), pages 2719-2733, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prabal Das & D. A. Sachindra & Kironmala Chanda, 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Rainfall Forecasting with Multiple Non-Linear Feature Selection Algorithms," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(15), pages 6043-6071, December.
    2. Dayong Li & Zengchuan Dong & Liyao Shi & Jintao Liu & Zhenye Zhu & Wei Xu, 2019. "Risk Probability Assessment of Sudden Water Pollution in the Plain River Network Based on Random Discharge from Multiple Risk Sources," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(12), pages 4051-4065, September.
    3. El Hassene Ait Mokhtar & Radouane Laggoune & Alaa Chateauneuf, 2016. "Utility-Based Maintenance Optimization for Complex Water-Distribution Systems Using Bayesian Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(12), pages 4153-4170, September.
    4. Parisa Noorbeh & Abbas Roozbahani & Hamid Kardan Moghaddam, 2020. "Annual and Monthly Dam Inflow Prediction Using Bayesian Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(9), pages 2933-2951, July.
    5. Massoud Tabesh & Abbas Roozbahani & Bardia Roghani & Niousha Rasi Faghihi & Reza Heydarzadeh, 2018. "Risk Assessment of Factors Influencing Non-Revenue Water Using Bayesian Networks and Fuzzy Logic," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(11), pages 3647-3670, September.
    6. Kızılöz, Burak & Şişman, Eyüp & Oruç, Halil Nurullah, 2022. "Predicting a water infrastructure leakage index via machine learning," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Caspar V. C. Geelen & Doekle R. Yntema & Jaap Molenaar & Karel J. Keesman, 2019. "Monitoring Support for Water Distribution Systems based on Pressure Sensor Data," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(10), pages 3339-3353, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    IoT; Water Management; Home Assistant;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:9:y:2021:p:367-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.