IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v9y2021p165-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gestionarea durabila a padurilor urbane in orasele inteligente

Author

Listed:
  • Laurentiu CIORNEI

    (Center for Study and Research for Agro Forestry Biodiversity Acad. David Davidescu, Romanian Academy)

  • Paula MUNTEANU

    (School of Advanced Studies of the Romanian Academy (SCOSAAR), Romanian Academy)

Abstract

Dezvoltarea oraselor inteligente face parte dintr-o serie de obiective de dezvoltare durabila centrate pe bunastare economica, sociala, culturala, iar unul dintre domeniile definitorii pentru evaluarea calitatii vietii il reprezinta modul in care sunt gestionate spatiile publice verzi, implicit padurile urbane. Ca principiu, tranzitia la orasele inteligente nu inseamna renuntarea la toata dezvoltarea existenta si infiintarea unor orase noi, dupa tipare noi, standardizate, ci dimpotriva. Acest proces trebuie centrat pe contextul si ecosistemele actuale. Prin concepte si tehnologii noi, orasele inteligente trebuie sa restabileasca echilibrul natural primordial, iar spatiile verzi sa fie adaptate circumstantelor actuale si astfel sa contribuie la atenuarea schimbarilor climatice resimtite la nivel global. Din aceasta perspectiva, in Romania, tranzitia catre orasele inteligente trebuie sa porneasca de la presiunile cu care se confrunta mediile urbane, in special Capitala, in special la carenta spatiilor verzi, amplasarea, tipologia, starea si managementul acestora. Tema este deosebit de vasta, astfel ca studiul curent reprezinta un preambul al unei serii de studii intreprinse avand ca obiectiv final restabilirea echilibrului natural si conservarea biodiversitatii din mediul urban. Cercetarea are in vedere identificarea principalelor deficiente ale modului in care au fost create si gestionate spatiile verzi din Bucuresti si elaborarea directiilor prioritare pe care autoritatile trebuie sa le impuna pentru dezvoltarea padurilor urbane si gestionarea durabila a acestora. Rezultatele preliminare indica faptul ca elementele antropice au fost dezvoltate pe seama scaderii intinderii si calitatii elementelor naturale, in special in anii in care dezvoltarea imobiliara si comerciala a fost orientata spre centrul orasului. Mai mult, in demersurile efectuate cu privire la spatiile publice verzi, multe dintre speciile folosite nu (mai) sunt adaptate conditiilor climatice si urbane actuale. Lucrarea se adreseaza autoritatilor locale, agentilor economici, cercetatorilor si publicului larg, fiecare dintre acestia avand un rol important in crearea si gestionarea durabila a padurilor urbane romanesti.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurentiu CIORNEI & Paula MUNTEANU, 2021. "Gestionarea durabila a padurilor urbane in orasele inteligente," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 9, pages 165-178, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:9:y:2021:p:165-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/364/329
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/364
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bolund, Per & Hunhammar, Sven, 1999. "Ecosystem services in urban areas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 293-301, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goran Krsnik & Sonia Reyes-Paecke & Keith M. Reynolds & Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo & José Ramón González Olabarria, 2023. "Assessing Relativeness in the Provision of Urban Ecosystem Services: Better Comparison Methods for Improved Well-Being," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Gaodi Xie & Wenhui Chen & Shuyan Cao & Chunxia Lu & Yu Xiao & Changshun Zhang & Na Li & Shuo Wang, 2014. "The Outward Extension of an Ecological Footprint in City Expansion: The Case of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-16, December.
    3. P. Hlaváčková & D. Šafařík, 2016. "Quantification of the utility value of the recreational function of forests from the aspect of valuation practice," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(8), pages 345-356.
    4. Alexander V. Rusanov, 2019. "Dacha dwellers and gardeners: garden plots and second homes in Europe and Russia," Population and Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 3(1), pages 107-124, April.
    5. Hui, Ling Chui & Jim, C.Y., 2022. "Urban-greenery demands are affected by perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices, and socio-demographic and environmental-cultural factors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Monika Kopecká & Daniel Szatmári & Konštantín Rosina, 2017. "Analysis of Urban Green Spaces Based on Sentinel-2A: Case Studies from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    8. Ahmet Tolunay & Çağlar Başsüllü, 2015. "Willingness to Pay for Carbon Sequestration and Co-Benefits of Forests in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, March.
    9. Vasileios A. Tzanakakis & Andrea G. Capodaglio & Andreas N. Angelakis, 2023. "Insights into Global Water Reuse Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-30, August.
    10. Massoni, Emma Soy & Barton, David N. & Rusch, Graciela M. & Gundersen, Vegard, 2018. "Bigger, more diverse and better? Mapping structural diversity and its recreational value in urban green spaces," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 502-516.
    11. Somajita Paul & Harini Nagendra, 2017. "Factors Influencing Perceptions and Use of Urban Nature: Surveys of Park Visitors in Delhi," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Bo Yang & Ming-Han Li & Shujuan Li, 2013. "Design-with-Nature for Multifunctional Landscapes: Environmental Benefits and Social Barriers in Community Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, October.
    13. Dennis, Matthew & James, Philip, 2017. "Ecosystem services of collectively managed urban gardens: Exploring factors affecting synergies and trade-offs at the site level," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 17-26.
    14. Gregg C. Brill & Pippin M. L. Anderson & Patrick O’Farrell, 2022. "Relational Values of Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Urban Conservation Area: The Case of Table Mountain National Park, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Donatella Valente & María Victoria Marinelli & Erica Maria Lovello & Cosimo Gaspare Giannuzzi & Irene Petrosillo, 2022. "Fostering the Resiliency of Urban Landscape through the Sustainable Spatial Planning of Green Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Vahid Amini Parsa & Esmail Salehi & Ahmad Reza Yavari & Peter M van Bodegom, 2019. "An improved method for assessing mismatches between supply and demand in urban regulating ecosystem services: A case study in Tabriz, Iran," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, August.
    17. Aevermann Tim & Schmude Jürgen, 2015. "Quantification and monetary valuation of urban ecosystem services in Munich, Germany," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 59(3), pages 188-200, December.
    18. J. Amy Belaire & Heather Bass & Heather Venhaus & Keri Barfield & Tim Pannkuk & Katherine Lieberknecht & Shalene Jha, 2023. "High-Performance Landscapes: Re-Thinking Design and Management Choices to Enhance Ecological Benefits in Urban Environments," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Ou Deng & Yiqiu Li & Ruoshuang Li & Guangbin Yang, 2022. "Estimation of Forest Ecosystem Climate Regulation Service Based on Actual Evapotranspiration of New Urban Areas in Guanshanhu District, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Brown, Melanie G. & Quinn, John E., 2018. "Zoning does not improve the availability of ecosystem services in urban watersheds. A case study from Upstate South Carolina, USA," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PB), pages 254-265.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    dezvoltare durabilă; calitatea vieții; împădurire; specii adecvate;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:9:y:2021:p:165-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.